Literature DB >> 23963533

[The importance of pathology in the German prostate cancer study PREFERE].

G Kristiansen1, M Stöckle, P Albers, H Schmidberger, P Martus, S Wellek, M Härter, R Bussar-Maatz, T Wiegel.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most common carcinoma of elderly males and holds the third place in the ranking of cancer-specific mortality. However, total mortality rate of 3 % is low and half of the patients die from other diseases, which is for the most part due to significantly improved diagnostic methods and the increasing use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. This has led to a stage migration towards early tumor stages that are prognostically heterogeneous and require differentiated treatment. The German and European guidelines recommend four therapy options (i.e. radical prostatectomy, percutaneous irradiation, permanent seed implantation and active surveillance) for localized prostate cancer and from contemporary study data it is unclear which therapy is most beneficial. This will be the subject of the PREFERE trial, a prospective randomized multicentre trial which plans to recruit 7,600 patients and to observe them over a period of up to 17 years. The histopathological diagnosis of the primary biopsy plays a crucial role in the inclusion criteria, as this article outlines in detail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23963533     DOI: 10.1007/s00292-013-1788-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathologe        ISSN: 0172-8113            Impact factor:   1.011


  24 in total

Review 1.  The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; William C Allsbrook; Mahul B Amin; Lars L Egevad
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 2.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Walter Artibani; Andrea Cestari; Antonio Galfano; Markus Graefen; Giorgio Guazzoni; Bertrand Guillonneau; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Vipul Patel; Jens Rassweiler; Hendrik Van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching.

Authors:  Ahmed Magheli; Mark L Gonzalgo; Li-Ming Su; Thomas J Guzzo; George Netto; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  The German S3 guideline prostate cancer: aspects for the radiation oncologist.

Authors:  Frederik Wenz; Thomas Martin; Dirk Böhmer; Stefan Martens; Felix Sedlmayer; Manfred Wirth; Kurt Miller; Axel Heidenreich; Mark Schrader; Wolfgang Hinkelbein; Thomas Wiegel
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Central prostate pathology review: should it be mandatory?

Authors:  Rodolfo Montironi; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Liang Cheng; Francesco Montorsi; Marina Scarpelli
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  [Radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the new S3 guideline. Part 2: postoperative radiation therapy and brachytherapy].

Authors:  T Martin; F Wenz; D Böhmer; F Sedlmayer; W Hinkelbein; T O Henkel; K Miller; T Wiegel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Phase 3 study of adjuvant radiotherapy versus wait and see in pT3 prostate cancer: impact of pathology review on analysis.

Authors:  Dirk Bottke; Reinhard Golz; Stephan Störkel; Axel Hinke; Alessandra Siegmann; Lothar Hertle; Kurt Miller; Wolfgang Hinkelbein; Thomas Wiegel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  False-negative prostate needle biopsies: frequency, histopathologic features, and follow-up.

Authors:  Tineke Wolters; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Cornelis J Vissers; Chris H Bangma; Monique Roobol; Fritz H Schröder; Geert J L H van Leenders
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Liying Zhang; Adam Lam; Robert Nam; Alexandre Mamedov; Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Significance of Accurate Determination of Gleason Score for Therapeutic Options and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Burkhard Helpap; Daniel Ringli; Jens Tonhauser; Immanuel Poser; Jürgen Breul; Heidrun Gevensleben; Hans-Helge Seifert
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.201

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.