Literature DB >> 19935058

False-negative prostate needle biopsies: frequency, histopathologic features, and follow-up.

Tineke Wolters1, Theodorus H van der Kwast, Cornelis J Vissers, Chris H Bangma, Monique Roobol, Fritz H Schröder, Geert J L H van Leenders.   

Abstract

Little is known about the frequency, histopathologic characteristics, and clinical consequences of false-negative prostate biopsies, that is, biopsies classified as benign but containing adenocarcinoma or atypical suspicious glands [atypical small acinar proliferations (ASAP)]. Objective of this study was to evaluate false-negative prostate biopsy in a prostate cancer screening setting. Prostate biopsy sets of 196 participants of a screening trial, which had been reported as "benign" at initial diagnosis, followed by a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in a subsequent screening round were reviewed by 2 urologic pathologists. Adenocarcinoma was identified in 19 biopsy cores corresponding to 16 (8.2%) patients and ASAP in 24 cores, corresponding to 19 patients (9.7%). All missed prostate cancers were Gleason score 6 (3+3). After correction for patient selection, the overall false-negative biopsy rate was estimated to be 2.4%; 1.1% for prostate cancer; and 1.3% for ASAP. Clinicopathologic features at the time of initial biopsy and of subsequent prostate cancer diagnosis did not differ between patients with a false-negative or true benign biopsy. Relatively low number of atypical glands (<10 glands), intense intermingling with preexistent glands or lack of architectural disorganization were the most prominent risk factors for a false-negative diagnosis. Another potential pitfall was the presence of prostate cancer variants, as 1 adenocarcinoma was of foamy gland type and 3 of pseudohyperplastic type. Routine examination of at least 1 level of prostate biopsy sets at high magnification and awareness of histologic prostate cancer variants might reduce the risk of missing or misinterpreting a relevant lesion at prostate biopsy evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19935058     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181c3ece9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  19 in total

1.  Profiling of circulating microRNAs for prostate cancer biomarker discovery.

Authors:  Christa Haldrup; Nobuyoshi Kosaka; Takahiro Ochiya; Michael Borre; Soren Høyer; Torben F Orntoft; Karina D Sorensen
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.617

2.  Expression and significance of cortactin and HDAC6 in human prostatic foamy gland carcinoma.

Authors:  Huilian Hou; Le Zhao; Wei Chen; Jing Li; Qinqin Zuo; Guanjun Zhang; Xuebin Zhang; Xu Li
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Release of Cell-free MicroRNA Tumor Biomarkers into the Blood Circulation with Pulsed Focused Ultrasound: A Noninvasive, Anatomically Localized, Molecular Liquid Biopsy.

Authors:  John R Chevillet; Tatiana D Khokhlova; Maria D Giraldez; George R Schade; Frank Starr; Yak-Nam Wang; Emily N Gallichotte; Kai Wang; Joo Ha Hwang; Muneesh Tewari
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  [The importance of pathology in the German prostate cancer study PREFERE].

Authors:  G Kristiansen; M Stöckle; P Albers; H Schmidberger; P Martus; S Wellek; M Härter; R Bussar-Maatz; T Wiegel
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  Guidelines on processing and reporting of prostate biopsies: the 2013 update of the pathology committee of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).

Authors:  T Van der Kwast; L Bubendorf; C Mazerolles; M R Raspollini; G J Van Leenders; C-G Pihl; P Kujala
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 6.  Single foci prostate cancer: current diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Ioannis Efthimiou; Konstadinos Skrepetis; Elefteria Bournia
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2013-07-28

7.  [Diagnostic histopathology of prostate cancer].

Authors:  G Kristiansen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Beyond PSA: the next generation of prostate cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  John R Prensner; Mark A Rubin; John T Wei; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  Diagnostic role of prostate resection in the elderly patients who experience significant co-morbidity with a high clinical suspicion of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ho Won Kang; Jin Bak Yang; Whi-An Kwon; Young-Suk Lee; Won Tae Kim; Yong-June Kim; Seok-Joong Yun; Sang-Cheol Lee; Isaac Yi Kim; Wun-Jae Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Independent real-world application of a clinical-grade automated prostate cancer detection system.

Authors:  Leonard M da Silva; Emilio M Pereira; Paulo Go Salles; Ran Godrich; Rodrigo Ceballos; Jeremy D Kunz; Adam Casson; Julian Viret; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Carlos Gil Ferreira; Bruno Ferrari; Brandon Rothrock; Patricia Raciti; Victor Reuter; Belma Dogdas; George DeMuth; Jillian Sue; Christopher Kanan; Leo Grady; Thomas J Fuchs; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 7.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.