Literature DB >> 23962892

Computational design of protein-small molecule interfaces.

Brittany Allison1, Steven Combs1, Sam DeLuca2, Gordon Lemmon2, Laura Mizoue3, Jens Meiler4.   

Abstract

The computational design of proteins that bind small molecule ligands is one of the unsolved challenges in protein engineering. It is complicated by the relatively small size of the ligand which limits the number of intermolecular interactions. Furthermore, near-perfect geometries between interacting partners are required to achieve high binding affinities. For apolar, rigid small molecules the interactions are dominated by short-range van der Waals forces. As the number of polar groups in the ligand increases, hydrogen bonds, salt bridges, cation-π, and π-π interactions gain importance. These partial covalent interactions are longer ranged, and additionally, their strength depends on the environment (e.g. solvent exposure). To assess the current state of protein-small molecule interface design, we benchmark the popular computer algorithm Rosetta on a diverse set of 43 protein-ligand complexes. On average, we achieve sequence recoveries in the binding site of 59% when the ligand is allowed limited reorientation, and 48% when the ligand is allowed full reorientation. When simulating the redesign of a protein binding site, sequence recovery among residues that contribute most to binding was 52% when slight ligand reorientation was allowed, and 27% when full ligand reorientation was allowed. As expected, sequence recovery correlates with ligand displacement.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational interface design; Ligand docking; Protein-small molecule interaction; Rosetta; RosettaLigand; Sequence optimization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23962892      PMCID: PMC3946393          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Struct Biol        ISSN: 1047-8477            Impact factor:   2.867


  40 in total

1.  Fast calculation of molecular polar surface area as a sum of fragment-based contributions and its application to the prediction of drug transport properties.

Authors:  P Ertl; B Rohde; P Selzer
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2000-10-05       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 2.  Protein therapeutics: promises and challenges for the 21st century.

Authors:  Zhiping Weng; Charles DeLisi
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 19.536

3.  Novel methods for the prediction of logP, pK(a), and logD.

Authors:  Li Xing; Robert C Glen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug

Review 4.  Biosensors for environmental pollutants and food contaminants.

Authors:  Antje J Baeumner
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 4.142

5.  Basic local alignment search tool.

Authors:  S F Altschul; W Gish; W Miller; E W Myers; D J Lipman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1990-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  Progress in modeling of protein structures and interactions.

Authors:  Ora Schueler-Furman; Chu Wang; Phil Bradley; Kira Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Complete reaction cycle of a cocaine catalytic antibody at atomic resolution.

Authors:  Xueyong Zhu; Tobin J Dickerson; Claude J Rogers; Gunnar F Kaufmann; Jenny M Mee; Kathleen M McKenzie; Kim D Janda; Ian A Wilson
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes.

Authors:  Tanja Kortemme; Alexandre V Morozov; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  OSPREY: protein design with ensembles, flexibility, and provable algorithms.

Authors:  Pablo Gainza; Kyle E Roberts; Ivelin Georgiev; Ryan H Lilien; Daniel A Keedy; Cheng-Yu Chen; Faisal Reza; Amy C Anderson; David C Richardson; Jane S Richardson; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.600

10.  Computational design of receptors for an organophosphate surrogate of the nerve agent soman.

Authors:  Malin Allert; Shahir S Rizk; Loren L Looger; Homme W Hellinga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-17       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  11 in total

1.  Approaching protein design with multisite λ dynamics: Accurate and scalable mutational folding free energies in T4 lysozyme.

Authors:  Ryan L Hayes; Jonah Z Vilseck; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Web-accessible molecular modeling with Rosetta: The Rosetta Online Server that Includes Everyone (ROSIE).

Authors:  Rocco Moretti; Sergey Lyskov; Rhiju Das; Jens Meiler; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Computational design of membrane proteins using RosettaMembrane.

Authors:  Amanda M Duran; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Rosetta and the Design of Ligand Binding Sites.

Authors:  Rocco Moretti; Brian J Bender; Brittany Allison; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2016

5.  AbDesign: An algorithm for combinatorial backbone design guided by natural conformations and sequences.

Authors:  Gideon D Lapidoth; Dror Baran; Gabriele M Pszolla; Christoffer Norn; Assaf Alon; Michael D Tyka; Sarel J Fleishman
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-06-06

Review 6.  Step-by-step design of proteins for small molecule interaction: A review on recent milestones.

Authors:  José M Pereira; Maria Vieira; Sérgio M Santos
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 6.993

7.  Coupling Protein Side-Chain and Backbone Flexibility Improves the Re-design of Protein-Ligand Specificity.

Authors:  Noah Ollikainen; René M de Jong; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 8.  Protocols for Molecular Modeling with Rosetta3 and RosettaScripts.

Authors:  Brian J Bender; Alberto Cisneros; Amanda M Duran; Jessica A Finn; Darwin Fu; Alyssa D Lokits; Benjamin K Mueller; Amandeep K Sangha; Marion F Sauer; Alexander M Sevy; Gregory Sliwoski; Jonathan H Sheehan; Frank DiMaio; Jens Meiler; Rocco Moretti
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  De novo design of a fluorescence-activating β-barrel.

Authors:  Jiayi Dou; Anastassia A Vorobieva; William Sheffler; Lindsey A Doyle; Hahnbeom Park; Matthew J Bick; Binchen Mao; Glenna W Foight; Min Yen Lee; Lauren A Gagnon; Lauren Carter; Banumathi Sankaran; Sergey Ovchinnikov; Enrique Marcos; Po-Ssu Huang; Joshua C Vaughan; Barry L Stoddard; David Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  New computational protein design methods for de novo small molecule binding sites.

Authors:  James E Lucas; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.