Literature DB >> 23961780

Retention characteristics of motor short-term memory cues.

R G Marteniuk1.   

Abstract

The retention characteristics of several cues thought to underlie movement reproduction ability were examined and the results were discussed in terms of two models of motor short-term memory (Laabs, 1973; Pepper & Herman, 1970). Trace decay was indexed by constant error and not variable error. It appeared that the movement cues studied all had access to the central processing capacity in that forgetting did not occur until rehearsal was blocked by the introduction of a secondary task. However, there was some evidence to indicate that different cues are centrally represented in varying degrees of exactness. In this respect reliance on active movement cues and location cues produced better reproduction than passive movement and distance cues, respectively. The existence of an adaptation level established from the range of movement utilized was supported, and short movements were more dependent on central processing capacity than were long movements.

Entities:  

Year:  1973        PMID: 23961780     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1973.10734972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  9 in total

1.  Auditory feedback and memory for music performance: sound evidence for an encoding effect.

Authors:  Steven A Finney; Caroline Palmer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-01

2.  Task-dependent asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback for goal-directed movement.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Memory trace strength and response biasing in short-term motor memory.

Authors:  G E Stelmach; J A Scott Kelso
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-01

4.  Proprioceptive target matching asymmetries in left-handed individuals.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Brittany C Noble; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Preselection and response biasing in short-term motor memory.

Authors:  G E Stelmach; J A Kelso; P D McCullagh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1976-01

6.  Can proprioceptive training improve motor learning?

Authors:  Jeremy D Wong; Dinant A Kistemaker; Alvin Chin; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Allocation of Attentional Resources toward a Secondary Cognitive Task Leads to Compromised Ankle Proprioceptive Performance in Healthy Young Adults.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Yasuda; Yuki Sato; Naoyuki Iimura; Hiroyasu Iwata
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2014-01-02

8.  Reliable and Rapid Robotic Assessment of Wrist Proprioception Using a Gauge Position Matching Paradigm.

Authors:  Mike D Rinderknecht; Werner L Popp; Olivier Lambercy; Roger Gassert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Ability of individuals with chronic hemiparetic stroke to locate their forearms during single-arm and between-arms tasks.

Authors:  Netta Gurari; Justin M Drogos; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.