Literature DB >> 23961220

Influence of inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on tomato plant growth and nematode reproduction under greenhouse conditions.

Omar A Almaghrabi1, Samia I Massoud, Tamer S Abdelmoneim.   

Abstract

Numerous species of soil bacteria which flourish in the rhizosphere of plants or around plant tissues stimulate plant growth and reduce nematode population by antagonistic behavior. These bacteria are collectively known as PGPR (plant growth promoting rhizobacteria). The effects of six isolates of PGPR Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Serratia marcescens, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus cereus, were studied on tomato plant growth and root knot nematode reproduction after 45 days from nematode infection. The highest number of shoot dry weight/g (43.00 g) was detected in the plant treated with S. marcescens; then P. putida (34.33 g), B. amyloliquefaciens (31.66 g), P. fluorescens (30.0 g), B. subtilis (29.0 g), B. cereus (27.0 g) and nematode alone (untreated) 20 g/plant. While the highest number of plant height was observed when plant was treated with S. marcescens, P. fluorescens, P. putida, B. amyloliquefaciens and P. putida 52.66, 50.66, 48 and 48 cm respectively. No significant differences were seen between previous treatments but only had significant differences compared with untreated plant. The highest number of fruit/plant was observed when plants were treated with S. marcescens (10.66), then B. amyloliquefaciens (8.66), P. putida (8), P. fluorescens (8) and B. cereus (7.66). No significant differences between the last 4 treatments, but all had significant differences compared with untreated plants. The highest weight of plant yield (g) was observed with S. marcescens (319.6 g/plant) and the lowest weight of plant yield was observed in plants treated with nematode alone (untreated). On the other hand, the lowest numbers of J2/10 g of soil (78), galls/root, (24.33) galls/root, egg masses/root (12.66) and egg/egg masses were observed in the plants treated with S. marcescens.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological control; Meloidogyne; PGPR; Pseudomonas; Rhizobacteria

Year:  2012        PMID: 23961220      PMCID: PMC3730550          DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci        ISSN: 1319-562X            Impact factor:   4.219


  12 in total

1.  Nanogram amounts of salicylic acid produced by the rhizobacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2 activate the systemic acquired resistance pathway in bean.

Authors:  G De Meyer; K Capieau; K Audenaert; A Buchala; J P Métraux; M Höfte
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 2.  Research on plant-parasitic nematode biology conducted by the United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service.

Authors:  David J Chitwood
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2003 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 4.845

Review 3.  Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressiveness to plant pathogens.

Authors:  David M Weller; Jos M Raaijmakers; Brian B McSpadden Gardener; Linda S Thomashow
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  2002-05-13       Impact factor: 13.078

Review 4.  Applications of free living plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria.

Authors:  M Lucy; E Reed; Bernard R Glick
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.271

5.  Meloidogyne incognita: a metabolic sink.

Authors:  M A McClure
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.402

6.  Induced Systemic Resistance and Promotion of Plant Growth by Bacillus spp.

Authors:  Joseph W Kloepper; Choong-Min Ryu; Shouan Zhang
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 7.  Nematode pathogenesis and resistance in plants.

Authors:  V M Williamson; R S Hussey
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Exploiting genotypic diversity of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producing Pseudomonas spp.: characterization of superior root-colonizing P. fluorescens strain Q8r1-96.

Authors:  J M Raaijmakers; D M Weller
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Structural and functional characterization of three polyketide synthase gene clusters in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB 42.

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Chen; Joachim Vater; Jörn Piel; Peter Franke; Romy Scholz; Kathrin Schneider; Alexandra Koumoutsi; Gabriele Hitzeroth; Nicolas Grammel; Axel W Strittmatter; Gerhard Gottschalk; Roderich D Süssmuth; Rainer Borriss
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria.

Authors:  L C van Loon; P A Bakker; C M Pieterse
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 13.078

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Disease management of tomato through PGPB: current trends and future perspective.

Authors:  Vipin Kumar Singh; Amit Kishore Singh; Ajay Kumar
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 2.  Biological control: a novel strategy for the control of the plant parasitic nematodes.

Authors:  Gufran Ahmad; Amir Khan; Abrar A Khan; Asgar Ali; Heba I Mohhamad
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 2.271

Review 3.  Rhizobacteria with nematicide aptitude: enzymes and compounds associated.

Authors:  C Castaneda-Alvarez; E Aballay
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 4.  Microbial-assisted and genomic-assisted breeding: a two way approach for the improvement of nutritional quality traits in agricultural crops.

Authors:  Ajay Kumar Chandra; Amarjeet Kumar; Alka Bharati; Rini Joshi; Aparna Agrawal; Sumit Kumar
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.406

5.  Nematicidal effect of rhizobacteria on plant-parasitic nematodes associated with vineyards.

Authors:  E Aballay; S Prodan; A Zamorano; C Castaneda-Alvarez
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 6.  Biofertilizer microorganisms accompanying pathogenic attributes: a potential threat.

Authors:  Mohsin Tariq; Farwah Jameel; Usman Ijaz; Muhammad Abdullah; Kamran Rashid
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2022-02-08

7.  Effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPR) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation on oats in saline-alkali soil contaminated by petroleum to enhance phytoremediation.

Authors:  Feifei Xun; Baoming Xie; Shasha Liu; Changhong Guo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Effect of Individual, Simultaneous and Sequential Inoculation of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Meloidogyne incognita on Growth, Biochemical, Enzymatic and Nonenzymatic Antioxidants of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.).

Authors:  Ahmed Noureldeen; Mohd Asif; Taruba Ansari; Faryad Khan; Mohammad Shariq; Faheem Ahmad; Manar Fawzi Bani Mfarrej; Amir Khan; Moh Tariq; Mansoor Ahmad Siddiqui; Amal Al-Barty; Hadeer Darwish
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-04

9.  Isolation and identification of indigenous plant growth promoting rhizobacteria from Himalayan region of Kashmir and their effect on improving growth and nutrient contents of maize (Zea mays L.).

Authors:  Mahwish Zahid; M Kaleem Abbasi; Sohail Hameed; Nasir Rahim
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Impact of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Inoculation and Grafting on Tolerance of Tomato to Combined Water and Nutrient Stress Assessed via Metabolomics Analysis.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kalozoumis; Dimitrios Savvas; Konstantinos Aliferis; Georgia Ntatsi; George Marakis; Evridiki Simou; Anastasia Tampakaki; Ioannis Karapanos
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.