Literature DB >> 15012509

Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria.

L C van Loon1, P A Bakker, C M Pieterse.   

Abstract

Nonpathogenic rhizobacteria can induce a systemic resistance in plants that is phenotypically similar to pathogen-induced systemic acquired resistance (SAR). Rhizobacteria-mediated induced systemic resistance (ISR) has been demonstrated against fungi, bacteria, and viruses in Arabidopsis, bean, carnation, cucumber, radish, tobacco, and tomato under conditions in which the inducing bacteria and the challenging pathogen remained spatially separated. Bacterial strains differ in their ability to induce resistance in different plant species, and plants show variation in the expression of ISR upon induction by specific bacterial strains. Bacterial determinants of ISR include lipopolysaccharides, siderophores, and salicylic acid (SA). Whereas some of the rhizobacteria induce resistance through the SA-dependent SAR pathway, others do not and require jasmonic acid and ethylene perception by the plant for ISR to develop. No consistent host plant alterations are associated with the induced state, but upon challenge inoculation, resistance responses are accelerated and enhanced. ISR is effective under field conditions and offers a natural mechanism for biological control of plant disease.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 15012509     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol        ISSN: 0066-4286            Impact factor:   13.078


  249 in total

1.  Trichoderma-induced plant immunity likely involves both hormonal- and camalexin-dependent mechanisms in Arabidopsis thaliana and confers resistance against necrotrophic fungi Botrytis cinerea.

Authors:  Hexon Angel Contreras-Cornejo; Lourdes Macías-Rodríguez; Elda Beltrán-Peña; Alfredo Herrera-Estrella; José López-Bucio
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2011-10-01

2.  Fatty acid competition as a mechanism by which Enterobacter cloacae suppresses Pythium ultimum sporangium germination and damping-off.

Authors:  K van Dijk; E B Nelson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Dissecting phosphite-induced priming in Arabidopsis infected with Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis.

Authors:  Kamal Massoud; Thierry Barchietto; Thomas Le Rudulier; Laurane Pallandre; Laure Didierlaurent; Marie Garmier; Françoise Ambard-Bretteville; Jean-Marc Seng; Patrick Saindrenan
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Isolation and identification of a gene in response to rice blast disease in rice.

Authors:  Xianwu Zheng; Xuewei Chen; Xiaohong Zhang; Zhongzhuan Lin; Junjun Shang; Jichen Xu; Wenxue Zhai; Lihuang Zhu
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 5.  Plant perceptions of plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas.

Authors:  Gail M Preston
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Are microbes at the root of a solution to world food production? Rational exploitation of interactions between microbes and plants can help to transform agriculture.

Authors:  John P Morrissey; J Maxwell Dow; G Louise Mark; Fergal O'Gara
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 7.  Ecological role of transgenerational resistance against biotic threats.

Authors:  Sergio Rasmann; Martin De Vos; Georg Jander
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2012-04-01

8.  Gene expression profiling through microarray analysis in Arabidopsis thaliana colonized by Pseudomonas putida MTCC5279, a plant growth promoting rhizobacterium.

Authors:  Suchi Srivastava; Vasvi Chaudhry; Aradhana Mishra; Puneet Singh Chauhan; Ateequr Rehman; Archana Yadav; Narendra Tuteja; Chandra S Nautiyal
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2012-02-01

Review 9.  Natural genetic and induced plant resistance, as a control strategy to plant-parasitic nematodes alternative to pesticides.

Authors:  Sergio Molinari
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.570

10.  Hexanoic acid protects tomato plants against Botrytis cinerea by priming defence responses and reducing oxidative stress.

Authors:  Ivan Finiti; María de la O Leyva; Begonya Vicedo; Rocío Gómez-Pastor; Jaime López-Cruz; Pilar García-Agustín; Maria Dolores Real; Carmen González-Bosch
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.663

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.