Literature DB >> 23960621

Comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance with gated SPECT for evaluation of left ventricular function and volumes in patients with severe and multiple myocardial perfusion defects.

Ahmed Fathala1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Gated SPECT is an accurate technique for assessment of myocardial perfusion (MP), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV). However recent studies have concluded that there are large discrepancies in assessment of LVEF and volumes by gated SPECT in patients with multiple severe myocardial perfusion defects. We sought to investigate the correlation between LVEF and volumes calculated by gated SPECT and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with severe multiple perfusion defects who are referred for CMR.
METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (20 male and 9 female, mean age: 63 years ± 11) with multiple severe fixed perfusion defects (mean 5 ± 3 segments) were referred to undergo CMR. The average time between CMR and SPECT was 4 weeks. LVEF, EDV, and ESV were derived automatically from gated SPECT. In the CMR studies, the endocardial and epicardial borders were delineated manually in the short axis planes to calculate the LVEF and volumes.
RESULTS: The different parameters were compared using linear regression, and correlation coefficients were calculated. Substantial correlation was found between CMR and gated SPECT for EDV: r = 0.7, p < 0.001. Moderate correlation between CMR and gated SPECT for LVEF: r = 0.5, p < 0.007 and ESV r =0 .53, p < 0.003.
CONCLUSION: Our data showed that the gated SPECT correlates substantially with MRI for measurement of EDV and moderately for ESV and LVEF in patients with multiple and severe perfusion defects. Thus, when accurate measurement is required, cardiac MRI is recommended.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR); Gated cardiac SPECT; Left ventricular function and volumes; Low ejection fraction

Year:  2010        PMID: 23960621      PMCID: PMC3727556          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsha.2010.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc        ISSN: 1016-7315


  18 in total

1.  Quantification of right and left ventricular function by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  N G Bellenger; F Grothues; G C Smith; D J Pennell
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Noninvasive modalities. Cardiac MR imaging.

Authors:  C H Lorenz; S Flacke; S E Fischer
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.213

4.  Electrocardiogram-gated single-photon emission computed tomography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Thomas A Trikalinos; Peter G Danias
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  An automatic approach to the analysis, quantitation and review of perfusion and function from myocardial perfusion SPECT images.

Authors:  G Germano; P B Kavanagh; D S Berman
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-08

6.  Left ventricular measurements with cine and spin-echo MR imaging: a study of reproducibility with variance component analysis.

Authors:  P M Pattynama; H J Lamb; E A van der Velde; E E van der Wall; A de Roos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  What is the optimal clinical technique for measurement of left ventricular volume after myocardial infarction? A comparative study of 3-dimensional echocardiography, single photon emission computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jonathan Chan; Carly Jenkins; Frederick Khafagi; Leanne Du; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.251

8.  Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction with quantitative gated SPECT: accuracy and correlation with first-pass radionuclide angiography.

Authors:  E Vallejo; D P Dione; A J Sinusas; F J Wackers
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study.

Authors:  Anja Wagner; Heiko Mahrholdt; Thomas A Holly; Michael D Elliott; Matthias Regenfus; Michele Parker; Francis J Klocke; Robert O Bonow; Raymond J Kim; Robert M Judd
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Left ventricular ejection fraction assessed from gated technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT.

Authors:  E G DePuey; K Nichols; C Dobrinsky
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  1 in total

1.  Real-time gated-SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging with CZT detectors: A promising tool for monitoring left ventricular function.

Authors:  Roberta Assante; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 5.952

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.