Literature DB >> 23958912

Optimization, validation, and application of a real-time PCR protocol for quantification of viable bacterial cells in municipal sewage sludge and biosolids using reporter genes and Escherichia coli.

Jessica K van Frankenhuyzen, Jack T Trevors, Cecily A Flemming, Hung Lee, Marc B Habash.   

Abstract

Biosolids result from treatment of sewage sludge to meet jurisdictional standards, including pathogen reduction. Once government regulations are met, materials can be applied to agricultural lands. Culture-based methods are used to enumerate pathogen indicator microorganisms but may underestimate cell densities, which is partly due to bacteria existing in a viable but non-culturable physiological state. Viable indicators can also be quantified by realtime polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) used with propidium monoazide (PMA), a dye that inhibits amplification of DNA found extracellularly or in dead cells. The objectives of this study were to test an optimized PMA-qPCR method for viable pathogen detection in wastewater solids and to validate it by comparing results to data obtained by conventional plating. Reporter genes from genetically marked Pseudomonas sp. UG14Lr and Agrobacterium tumefaciens 542 cells were spiked into samples of primary sludge, and anaerobically digested and Lystek-treated biosolids as cell-free DNA, dead cells, viable cells, and mixtures of live and dead cells, followed by DNA extraction with and without PMA, and qPCR. The protocol was then used for Escherichia coli quantification in the three matrices, and results compared to plate counts. PMA-qPCR selectively detected viable cells, while inhibiting signals from cell-free DNA and DNA found in membrane-compromised cells. PMA-qPCR detected 0.5-1 log unit more viable E. coli cells in both primary solids and dewatered biosolids than plate counts. No viable E. coli was found in Lystek-treated biosolids. These data suggest PMA-qPCR may more accurately estimate pathogen cell numbers than traditional culture methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23958912     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-013-1319-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of propidium monoazide with ethidium monoazide for differentiation of live vs. dead bacteria by selective removal of DNA from dead cells.

Authors:  Andreas Nocker; Ching-Ying Cheung; Anne K Camper
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 2.363

Review 2.  Processes for managing pathogens.

Authors:  Alan Godfree; Joseph Farrell
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.751

Review 3.  Release and persistence of extracellular DNA in the environment.

Authors:  Kaare M Nielsen; Pål J Johnsen; Douda Bensasson; Daniele Daffonchio
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2007-09-12

4.  Removal of free extracellular DNA from environmental samples by ethidium monoazide and propidium monoazide.

Authors:  Andreas O Wagner; Cornelia Malin; Brigitte A Knapp; Paul Illmer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments.

Authors:  Stephen A Bustin; Vladimir Benes; Jeremy A Garson; Jan Hellemans; Jim Huggett; Mikael Kubista; Reinhold Mueller; Tania Nolan; Michael W Pfaffl; Gregory L Shipley; Jo Vandesompele; Carl T Wittwer
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  Application of the fluorogenic probe technique (TaqMan PCR) to the detection of Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli in water samples.

Authors:  Edith Frahm; Ursula Obst
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.363

7.  Nutrient-enhanced survival of and phenanthrene mineralization by alginate-encapsulated and free Pseudomonas sp. UG14Lr cells in creosote-contaminated soil slurries.

Authors:  S C Weir; S P Dupuis; M A Providenti; H Lee; J T Trevors
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Use of ethidium monoazide and PCR in combination for quantification of viable and dead cells in complex samples.

Authors:  Knut Rudi; Birgitte Moen; Signe Marie Drømtorp; Askild L Holck
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Distribution of uidA gene sequences in Escherichia coli isolates in water sources and comparison with the expression of beta-glucuronidase activity in 4-methylumbelliferyl-beta-D-glucuronide media.

Authors:  M T Martins; I G Rivera; D L Clark; M H Stewart; R L Wolfe; B H Olson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Selective detection of live bacteria combining propidium monoazide sample treatment with microarray technology.

Authors:  Andreas Nocker; Alberto Mazza; Luke Masson; Anne K Camper; Roland Brousseau
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 2.363

View more
  8 in total

1.  Physicochemical characteristics and flavor profiles of fermented fish sauce (budu) during fermentation in commercial manufacturing plant.

Authors:  Phat Sakpetch; Omme Benchama; Payap Masniyom; Lakha Salaipeth; Pochanart Kanjan
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Rapid and accurate detection of bacteriophage activity against Escherichia coli O157:H7 by propidium monoazide real-time PCR.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Yan D Niu; Jinquan Li; Kim Stanford; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  New insights into the kinetics of bacterial growth and decay in pig manure-wheat straw aerobic composting based on an optimized PMA-qPCR method.

Authors:  Jinyi Ge; Guangqun Huang; Xiaoxi Sun; Hongjie Yin; Lujia Han
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 5.813

4.  Peptoid Efficacy against Polymicrobial Biofilms Determined by Using Propidium Monoazide-Modified Quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Yu Luo; Hannah L Bolt; Gabriela A Eggimann; Danny F McAuley; Ronan McMullan; Tanya Curran; Mei Zhou; Professor Colin A B Jahoda; Steven L Cobb; Fionnuala T Lundy
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.164

5.  Spiking a Silty-Sand Reference Soil with Bacterial DNA: Limits and Pitfalls in the Discrimination of Live and Dead Cells When Applying Ethidium Monoazide (EMA) Treatment.

Authors:  Andreas O Wagner; Nadine Praeg; Paul Illmer
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.188

6.  A Novel Propidium Monoazide-Based PCR Assay Can Measure Viable Uropathogenic E. coli In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Albert S Lee; Olivia K Lamanna; Kenji Ishida; Elaise Hill; Andrew Nguyen; Michael H Hsieh
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.293

7.  Designing primers and evaluation of the efficiency of propidium monoazide - Quantitative polymerase chain reaction for counting the viable cells of Lactobacillus gasseri and Lactobacillus salivarius.

Authors:  Chieh-Hsien Lai; Sih-Rong Wu; Jen-Chieh Pang; Latha Ramireddy; Yu-Cheng Chiang; Chien-Ku Lin; Hau-Yang Tsen
Journal:  J Food Drug Anal       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 6.157

8.  Effect of DNA extraction procedure, repeated extraction and ethidium monoazide (EMA)/propidium monoazide (PMA) treatment on overall DNA yield and impact on microbial fingerprints for bacteria, fungi and archaea in a reference soil.

Authors:  Andreas O Wagner; Nadine Praeg; Christoph Reitschuler; Paul Illmer
Journal:  Appl Soil Ecol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.046

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.