| Literature DB >> 23957940 |
Laure Brigitte Mabeku Kouitcheu1, Joseph Lebel Tamesse, Jacques Kouam.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Picralima nitida Stapf (Apocynaceae) is a medicinal plant used traditionally in Cameroon to cure various ailments such as gastrointestinal disorders and dysentery. This study reports the in vitro and in vivo anti-shigellosis activity of the methanol extract of this plant on rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23957940 PMCID: PMC3751740 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-211
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Chemical composition of methanol extract offruit-rinds
| Alkaloids | +++ |
| Leucoanthocyanins | ─ |
| Saponins | ++ |
| Tannins | + |
| Antraquinones | – |
| Polyphenols | +++ |
| Coumarins | – |
| Sterols and/or Triterpenes | – |
| Cardiac Glycoside | ++ |
| Reducing sugars | + |
| Glycosides | ++ |
| Anthranoid | – |
| Steroids | + |
| Flavonoids | ++ |
| Anthocyanin | – |
(−): Absence of chemical compound (+): Presence of chemical compound.
(+)< (++) < (+++): Base on the intensity of characteristic colour.
Antimicrobial activity of the (M) extract of PN (fruit-rinds) against microorganisms tested using(1.25 mg of the extract/disc)
| PN -M | – | ++ | ++ | +++ | – | – | ++ | ++ | – | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | – | ++ | ++ | – |
| Gentamicin | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | NT | NT |
| Nystatin | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | ++ | ++ |
M.m: M.morganii; E.c: E coli; S.a: S.aureus; P.V: P.vulgaris; C.f: C.freundii; S.f: S.flexneri; S.d: S.dysenteriae; E. c: E.cloacae; E.a: E.agglomerans; S.fe: S.feacalis; P.a: P.aeruginosa; P.m: P.mirabilis; S.t: S.typhi; K.p: K.pneumoniae; B.c: B.cereus; C.a: C.albicans; C.g: C.glabrata. NT: Not tested. (+): Zone of inhibition ≤ 8 mm in diameter. (++): Zone of inhibition > 8 mm and ≤ 20 mm in diameter. (+++): Zone of inhibition > 20 mm in diameter. (−): Negative.
The MIC and MBC values of the (M) extract of PN (fruit-rinds) against the microorganisms tested using microdilution assay
| MIC (μg/ml) | 50 | 200 | >12800 | 800 | 0. 78 | 3.12 | 200 | 3.12 | 100 | 100 | 25 | >12800 |
| MBC(μg/ml) | 1600 | 1600 | >12800 | 6400 | 1.56 | 12.5 | 800 | 12.5 | 400 | 400 | 200 | >12800 |
Values are the mean of three independent determination; the variation was less than 1/100 000. E.c: E coli; S.a: S.aureus; P.V: P.vulgaris; S.d: S.dysenteriae; En. c: E.cloacae; S.fe: S.feacalis; P.a: P.aeruginosa; P.m: P.mirabilis; S.t: S.typhi; B.c: B.cereus; C.a: C.albicans; C.g: C.glabrata. MIC: minimal inhibition concentration (μg/ml). MBC: minimal bactericidal concentration (μg/ml).
Antimicrobial susceptibility test performed with commercially available disks using Disc diffusion assay
| Diameters of the inhibitory zones (mm) | 18 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 14 | 12 | 24 | 0 | 18 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 18 | 0 |
Gentamycin (G), Amoxicyclin/ clavulanic Acid (A/C), Nitrofurantoin (Ni), Kanamycin (K), Ampicilin (A), Netilmicin (N), Colistin (C), Erythromycin (E), Ciprofloxacin (C), Amoxycylin (A), Vancomycin (V), Doxycyclin monohydrate (Dm), Spectinomycin (S), Tobramycin (T), Clindamycin (C), Dibekacin (D), Steptomycin (S) Cefoxitin (Ce).
Effect of the treatment on the mortality oftype 1 diarrheic rats
| | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Figure 1type I density in stool (logUFC/g) over 7 days of treatment with methanol extract of (PN) and ciprofloxacin (Ciprof). Each data column represents the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6). Data column of the same day with superscript * are significantly different compared with diarrheic control (* p < 0.05; **p < 0.01).
Figure 2Total stool frequency before and during treatment of type I diarrheic rats with methanol extract of (PN) and ciprofloxacin (Ciprof). Each data column represents the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6). Data column of the same day with superscript * are significantly different compared with diarrheic control (* p < 0.05; **p < 0.01).
Figure 3Total stool weight before and during treatment of type I diarrheic rats with methanol extract of (PN) and ciprofloxacin (Ciprof). Each data column represents the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6). Data column of the same day with superscript * are significantly different compared with diarrheic control (* p < 0.05; **p < 0.01).
Effect of the treatment on the percentage (%) of diarrheic stool oftype 1 diarrheic rats
| Vehicle | 0 | 5.55 | 25.40 | 32.79 | 56.60 | 72.00 | 80.95 | 95.23 |
| PN (125 mg/kg) | 0 | 4 | 10.34 | 19.05 | 20.00 | 23.26 | 26.09 | 38.88 |
| PN (250 mg/kg) | 0 | 2.24 | 4.35 | 3.85 | 0 | 0 | 1.22 | 0 |
| PN (500 mg/kg) | 0 | 3.57 | 2.32 | 1.75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ciprof (20 mg/kg) | 0 | 3.70 | 1.75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Effect of the treatment on the percentage (%) of mucus contains stool oftype 1 diarrheic rats
| Vehicle | 0 | 14.76 | 19.05 | 16.39 | 22.64 | 48.00 | 57.14 | 61.90 |
| PN (125 mg/kg) | 0 | 4.00 | 6.90 | 13.04 | 12.22 | 14.82 | 9.302 | 2.32 |
| PN (250 mg/kg) | 0 | 2.32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.04 | 0 |
| PN (500 mg/kg) | 0 | 3.57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ciprof (20 mg/kg) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Effect of PN-M on charcoal-induced gut transit changes
| Vehicle | 74.57 ± 9.90 | 0 |
| Atropine sulphate (5 mg/kg) | 40.32 ± 4.25 | 45.93 |
| PN (250 mg/kg) | 58.27 ± 11.20 | 21.86 |
| PN (500 mg/kg) | 60.54 ± 8.17 | 18.81 |
Data are means ± standard deviation (n = 6 per group). Values in the same column with superscript * are significantly different compared with control group (* p < 0.05; **p < 0.01).