Literature DB >> 23956811

Bayesian Dose Finding for Combined Drugs with Discrete and Continuous Doses.

Lin Huo1, Ying Yuan, Guosheng Yin.   

Abstract

The trend of treating patients with combined drugs has grown in cancer clinical trials. Often, evaluating the synergism of multiple drugs is the primary motivation for such drug-combination studies. To enhance the patient response, a new cancer therapeutic agent is often investigated together with an existing standard of care (SOC) agent. At least a certain amount of dosage of the SOC is administered in order to maintain some therapeutic effects in patients. For clinical trials involving a continuous-dose SOC and a discrete-dose agent, we propose a two-stage Bayesian adaptive dose-finding design. The first stage takes a continual reassessment method to locate the appropriate dose for the discrete-dose agent while fixing the continuous-dose SOC at the minimal therapeutic dose. In the second stage, we make a fine dose adjustment by calibrating the continuous dose to achieve the target toxicity rate as closely as possible. Dose escalation or de-escalation is based on the posterior estimates of the joint toxicity probabilities of combined doses. As the toxicity data accumulate during the trial, we adaptively assign each cohort of patients to the most appropriate dose combination. We conduct extensive simulation studies to examine the operating characteristics of the proposed two-stage design and demonstrate the design's good performance with practical scenarios.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian adaptive design; Combined drugs; Continual reassessment method; Maximum tolerated dose; Phase I trial; Toxicity probability; Two-stage design

Year:  2012        PMID: 23956811      PMCID: PMC3745226          DOI: 10.1214/12-ba735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bayesian Anal        ISSN: 1931-6690            Impact factor:   3.728


  18 in total

1.  Continual reassessment methods in phase I trials of the combination of two drugs in oncology.

Authors:  A Kramar; A Lebecq; E Candalh
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  An extension of the continual reassessment method using decision theory.

Authors:  Denis Heng-Yan Leung; You-Gan Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Competing designs for phase I clinical trials: a review.

Authors:  William F Rosenberger; Linda M Haines
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Two-dimensional dose finding in discrete dose space.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Anastasia Ivanova
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Sequential continual reassessment method for two-dimensional dose finding.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Practical implementation of a modified continual reassessment method for dose-finding trials.

Authors:  S Piantadosi; J D Fisher; S Grossman
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  B E Storer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  A hierarchical Bayesian design for phase I trials of novel combinations of cancer therapeutic agents.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun; Shufang Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies.

Authors:  S N Goodman; M L Zahurak; S Piantadosi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  The continual reassessment method for multiple toxicity grades: a Bayesian quasi-likelihood approach.

Authors:  Z Yuan; R Chappell; H Bailey
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  1 in total

1.  A dose-finding design for dual-agent trials with patient-specific doses for one agent with application to an opiate detoxification trial.

Authors:  Pavel Mozgunov; Suzie Cro; Anne Lingford-Hughes; Louise M Paterson; Thomas Jaki
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 1.894

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.