Literature DB >> 23956446

Criteria and prediction models for mismatch repair gene mutations: a review.

Aung Ko Win1, Robert J Macinnis, James G Dowty, Mark A Jenkins.   

Abstract

One of the strongest predictors of colorectal cancer risk is carrying a germline mutation in a DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene. Once identified, mutation carriers can be recommended for intensive screening that will substantially reduce their high colorectal cancer risk. Conversely, the relatives of carriers identified as non-carriers can be relieved of the burden of intensive screening. Criteria and prediction models that identify likely mutation carriers are needed for cost-effective, targeted, germline testing for MMR gene mutation. We reviewed 12 criteria/guidelines and 8 prediction models (Leiden, Amsterdam-plus, Amsterdam-alternative, MMRpro, PREMM1,2,6, MMRpredict, Associazione Italiana per lo studio della Familiarità ed Ereditarietà dei tumori Gastrointestinali (AIFEG) and the Myriad Genetics Prevalence table) for identifying mutation carriers. While criteria are only used to identify individuals with colorectal cancer (yes/no for screening followed by germline testing), all prediction models except MMRpredict and Myriad tables can predict the probability of carrying mutations for individuals with or without colorectal cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis of the discrimination performance of 17 studies that validated the prediction models. The pooled estimate for the area under curve was 0.80 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.88) for MMRpro, 0.81 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.88) for MMRpredict, 0.84 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.88) for PREMM, and 0.85 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.91) for Leiden model. Given the high degree of overlap in the CIs, we cannot state that one model has a higher discrimination than any of the others. Overall, the existing statistical models have been shown to be sensitive and specific (at a 5% cut-off) in predicting MMR gene mutation carriers. Future models may need to: provide prediction of PMS2 mutations, take into account a wider range of Lynch syndrome-associated cancers when assessing family history, and be applicable to all people irrespective of any cancer diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer: colon; Gastroenterology; Genetic screening/counselling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23956446     DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  13 in total

1.  Performance of Lynch syndrome predictive models in quantifying the likelihood of germline mutations in patients with abnormal MLH1 immunoexpression.

Authors:  Verónica Cabreira; Carla Pinto; Manuela Pinheiro; Paula Lopes; Ana Peixoto; Catarina Santos; Isabel Veiga; Patrícia Rocha; Pedro Pinto; Rui Henrique; Manuel R Teixeira
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Development and Validation of the PREMM5 Model for Comprehensive Risk Assessment of Lynch Syndrome.

Authors:  Fay Kastrinos; Hajime Uno; Chinedu Ukaegbu; Carmelita Alvero; Ashley McFarland; Matthew B Yurgelun; Matthew H Kulke; Deborah Schrag; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Charles S Fuchs; Robert J Mayer; Kimmie Ng; Ewout W Steyerberg; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Statistical methods for Mendelian models with multiple genes and cancers.

Authors:  Jane W Liang; Gregory E Idos; Christine Hong; Stephen B Gruber; Giovanni Parmigiani; Danielle Braun
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Female Hormonal Factors and the Risk of Endometrial Cancer in Lynch Syndrome.

Authors:  Seyedeh Ghazaleh Dashti; Rowena Chau; Driss Ait Ouakrim; Daniel D Buchanan; Mark Clendenning; Joanne P Young; Ingrid M Winship; Julie Arnold; Dennis J Ahnen; Robert W Haile; Graham Casey; Steven Gallinger; Stephen N Thibodeau; Noralane M Lindor; Loïc Le Marchand; Polly A Newcomb; John D Potter; John A Baron; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins; Aung Ko Win
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Update on colon cancer screening: recent advances and observations in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson; Robert D Shaw
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2014-09

Review 6.  Recent progress in Lynch syndrome and other familial colorectal cancer syndromes.

Authors:  Patrick M Boland; Matthew B Yurgelun; C Richard Boland
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 7.  Advances in Hereditary Colorectal and Pancreatic Cancers.

Authors:  Meghan L Underhill; Katharine A Germansky; Matthew B Yurgelun
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 3.393

8.  Immunohistochemical expression pattern of MMR protein can specifically identify patients with colorectal cancer microsatellite instability.

Authors:  Arfaoui Toumi Amira; Trabelsi Mouna; Blel Ahlem; Aloui Raoudha; Ben Hmida Majid; Hamza Amel; Zermani Rachida; Kourdaa Nadia
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-03-19

9.  Comparison of Prediction Models for Lynch Syndrome Among Individuals With Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Fay Kastrinos; Rohit P Ojha; Celine Leenen; Carmelita Alvero; Rowena C Mercado; Judith Balmaña; Irene Valenzuela; Francesc Balaguer; Roger Green; Noralane M Lindor; Stephen N Thibodeau; Polly Newcomb; Aung Ko Win; Mark Jenkins; Daniel D Buchanan; Lucio Bertario; Paola Sala; Heather Hampel; Sapna Syngal; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  Clinical problems of colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer cases with unknown cause of tumor mismatch repair deficiency (suspected Lynch syndrome).

Authors:  Daniel D Buchanan; Christophe Rosty; Mark Clendenning; Amanda B Spurdle; Aung Ko Win
Journal:  Appl Clin Genet       Date:  2014-10-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.