Literature DB >> 27581132

Performance of Lynch syndrome predictive models in quantifying the likelihood of germline mutations in patients with abnormal MLH1 immunoexpression.

Verónica Cabreira1,2, Carla Pinto1, Manuela Pinheiro1, Paula Lopes3, Ana Peixoto1, Catarina Santos1, Isabel Veiga1, Patrícia Rocha1, Pedro Pinto1, Rui Henrique3,4, Manuel R Teixeira5,6.   

Abstract

Lynch syndrome (LS) accounts for up to 4 % of all colorectal cancers (CRC). Detection of a pathogenic germline mutation in one of the mismatch repair genes is the definitive criterion for LS diagnosis, but it is time-consuming and expensive. Immunohistochemistry is the most sensitive prescreening test and its predictive value is very high for loss of expression of MSH2, MSH6, and (isolated) PMS2, but not for MLH1. We evaluated if LS predictive models have a role to improve the molecular testing algorithm in this specific setting by studying 38 individuals referred for molecular testing and who were subsequently shown to have loss of MLH1 immunoexpression in their tumors. For each proband we calculated a risk score, which represents the probability that the patient with CRC carries a pathogenic MLH1 germline mutation, using the PREMM1,2,6 and MMRpro predictive models. Of the 38 individuals, 18.4 % had a pathogenic MLH1 germline mutation. MMRpro performed better for the purpose of this study, presenting a AUC of 0.83 (95 % CI 0.67-0.9; P < 0.001) compared with a AUC of 0.68 (95 % CI 0.51-0.82, P = 0.09) for PREMM1,2,6. Considering a threshold of 5 %, MMRpro would eliminate unnecessary germline mutation analysis in a significant proportion of cases while keeping very high sensitivity. We conclude that MMRpro is useful to correctly predict who should be screened for a germline MLH1 gene mutation and propose an algorithm to improve the cost-effectiveness of LS diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immunohistochemistry; Lynch syndrome; Lynch syndrome predictive models; MLH1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27581132     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9926-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  31 in total

1.  Value of immunohistochemical detection of DNA mismatch repair proteins in predicting germline mutation in hereditary colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  Jinru Shia; David S Klimstra; Khedoudja Nafa; Kenneth Offit; Jose G Guillem; Arnold J Markowitz; William L Gerald; Nathan A Ellis
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Familial risk-colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  J Balmaña; F Balaguer; A Cervantes; D Arnold
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Methylation of the hMLH1 promoter correlates with lack of expression of hMLH1 in sporadic colon tumors and mismatch repair-defective human tumor cell lines.

Authors:  M F Kane; M Loda; G M Gaida; J Lipman; R Mishra; H Goldman; J M Jessup; R Kolodner
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Comparison of predictive models, clinical criteria and molecular tumour screening for the identification of patients with Lynch syndrome in a population-based cohort of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  J Balmaña; F Balaguer; S Castellví-Bel; E W Steyerberg; M Andreu; X Llor; R Jover; A Castells; S Syngal
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 5.  Prediction models in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Fay Kastrinos; Judith Balmaña; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Mutations of a mutS homolog in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F S Leach; N C Nicolaides; N Papadopoulos; B Liu; J Jen; R Parsons; P Peltomäki; P Sistonen; L A Aaltonen; M Nyström-Lahti
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-12-17       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Immunohistochemistry versus microsatellite instability testing for screening colorectal cancer patients at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Part I. The utility of immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Jinru Shia
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 5.568

8.  Economic evaluation of genetic screening for Lynch syndrome in Germany.

Authors:  Franziska Severin; Björn Stollenwerk; Elke Holinski-Feder; Elisabeth Meyer; Volker Heinemann; Clemens Giessen-Jung; Wolf Rogowski
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Extensive molecular screening for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  B Dieumegard; S Grandjouan; J C Sabourin; M L Le Bihan; I Lefrère; J P Pignon; P Rougier; P Lasser; J Bénard; D Couturier; B Bressac-de Paillerets
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Lynch syndrome: an updated review.

Authors:  Rishabh Sehgal; Kieran Sheahan; Patrick R O'Connell; Ann M Hanly; Sean T Martin; Desmond C Winter
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 4.096

View more
  1 in total

1.  Contribution of MLH1 constitutional methylation for Lynch syndrome diagnosis in patients with tumor MLH1 downregulation.

Authors:  Diana Pinto; Carla Pinto; Joana Guerra; Manuela Pinheiro; Rui Santos; Hege Marie Vedeld; Zeremariam Yohannes; Ana Peixoto; Catarina Santos; Pedro Pinto; Paula Lopes; Ragnhild Lothe; Guro Elisabeth Lind; Rui Henrique; Manuel R Teixeira
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.452

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.