PURPOSE: This study aims to report on the acceptability of a self-directed coping skills intervention, called Coping-Together, for patients affected by cancer and their partners, including the strengths and limitations of the intervention design. METHODS: This initial version of Coping-Together included a series of four booklets, which aimed to provide practical coping strategies for the day-to-day management of common physical and psychosocial challenges. Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 patients and/or 14 partners. Interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed for content. RESULTS: Participants endorsed the self-directed format, and the focus of Coping-Together on practical information was a feature that set it apart from other resources. The majority of participants interviewed felt that the proposed coping strategies were "doable"; however, only half of the participants reported learning new coping skills after reading the booklets. Additional benefits of reading the booklets were increasing awareness of challenges to prepare for, giving hope that something can help you "pull through", providing a sense of normality, connecting patients and partners to people and services, and complementing support received from health professionals. Despite the general acceptability of the intervention, some aspects of its design were criticized, including the workbook-like exercises, expectations about using the resource together, level of guidance provided, and amount of information included. In general, most participants felt that too much negative information was included, whereas more experiential information was desired. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary evaluation of Coping-Together supported its practical approach and highlighted improvements to enhance its contribution to patient and partner coping.
PURPOSE: This study aims to report on the acceptability of a self-directed coping skills intervention, called Coping-Together, for patients affected by cancer and their partners, including the strengths and limitations of the intervention design. METHODS: This initial version of Coping-Together included a series of four booklets, which aimed to provide practical coping strategies for the day-to-day management of common physical and psychosocial challenges. Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 patients and/or 14 partners. Interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed for content. RESULTS:Participants endorsed the self-directed format, and the focus of Coping-Together on practical information was a feature that set it apart from other resources. The majority of participants interviewed felt that the proposed coping strategies were "doable"; however, only half of the participants reported learning new coping skills after reading the booklets. Additional benefits of reading the booklets were increasing awareness of challenges to prepare for, giving hope that something can help you "pull through", providing a sense of normality, connecting patients and partners to people and services, and complementing support received from health professionals. Despite the general acceptability of the intervention, some aspects of its design were criticized, including the workbook-like exercises, expectations about using the resource together, level of guidance provided, and amount of information included. In general, most participants felt that too much negative information was included, whereas more experiential information was desired. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary evaluation of Coping-Together supported its practical approach and highlighted improvements to enhance its contribution to patient and partner coping.
Authors: Laurel L Northouse; Maria C Katapodi; Lixin Song; Lingling Zhang; Darlene W Mood Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2010-08-13 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Sylvie D Lambert; Afaf Girgis; Patrick McElduff; Jane Turner; Janelle V Levesque; Karen Kayser; Cathrine Mihalopoulos; Sophy T F Shih; Daniel Barker Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Sylvie D Lambert; Patrick McElduff; Afaf Girgis; Janelle V Levesque; Tim W Regan; Jane Turner; Hayley Candler; Cathrine Mihalopoulos; Sophy T F Shih; Karen Kayser; Peter Chong Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Marie-Claude Blais; Elizabeth Maunsell; Sophie Grenier; Sophie Lauzier; Michel Dorval; Sylvie Pelletier; Stéphane Guay; André Robidoux; Louise Provencher Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2014-04-27 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Matthew Asare; Luke J Peppone; Joseph A Roscoe; Ian R Kleckner; Karen M Mustian; Charles E Heckler; Joseph J Guido; Mark Sborov; Peter Bushunow; Adedayo Onitilo; Charles Kamen Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Sylvie D Lambert; Afaf Girgis; Patrick McElduff; Jane Turner; Janelle V Levesque; Karen Kayser; Cathrine Mihalopoulos; Sophy T F Shih; Daniel Barker Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Tammy Son; Sylvie Lambert; Ann Jakubowski; Barbara DiCicco-Bloom; Carmen G Loiselle Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Sylvie D Lambert; Lindsay R Duncan; Janet Ellis; John Wellesley Robinson; Carly Sears; Nicole Culos-Reed; Andrew Matthew; Manon De Raad; Jamie Lynn Schaffler; Daniel Santa Mina; Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri; Helen McTaggart-Cowan; Stuart Peacock Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2021-03-20
Authors: Afaf Girgis; Ivana Durcinoska; Janelle V Levesque; Martha Gerges; Tiffany Sandell; Anthony Arnold; Geoff P Delaney Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 5.428