Literature DB >> 23954628

PEGylated polylysine dendrimers increase lymphatic exposure to doxorubicin when compared to PEGylated liposomal and solution formulations of doxorubicin.

Gemma M Ryan1, Lisa M Kaminskas1, Jürgen B Bulitta1, Michelle P McIntosh1, David J Owen2, Christopher J H Porter3.   

Abstract

Improved delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs to the lymphatic system has the potential to augment outcomes for cancer therapy by enhancing activity against lymph node metastases. Uptake of small molecule chemotherapeutics into the lymphatic system, however, is limited. Nano-sized drug carriers have the potential to promote access to the lymphatics, but to this point, this has not been examined in detail. The current study therefore evaluated the lymphatic exposure of doxorubicin after subcutaneous and intravenous administration as a simple solution formulation or when formulated as a doxorubicin loaded PEGylated poly-lysine dendrimer (hydrodynamic diameter 12 nm), a PEGylated liposome (100 nm) and various pluronic micellar formulations (~5 nm) to thoracic lymph duct cannulated rats. Plasma and lymph pharmacokinetics were analysed by compartmental pharmacokinetic modelling in S-ADAPT, and Berkeley Madonna software was used to predict the lymphatic exposure of doxorubicin over an extended period of time. The micelle formulations displayed poor in vivo stability, resulting in doxorubicin profiles that were similar to that observed after administration of the doxorubicin solution formulation. In contrast, the dendrimer formulation significantly increased the recovery of doxorubicin in the thoracic lymph after both intravenous and subcutaneous dosing when compared to the solution or micellar formulation. Dendrimer-doxorubicin also resulted in increases in lymphatic doxorubicin concentrations when compared to the liposome formulation, although liposomal doxorubicin did increase lymphatic transport when compared to the solution formulation. Specifically, the dendrimer formulation increased the recovery of doxorubicin in the lymph up to 30 h post dose by up to 685 fold and 3.7 fold when compared to the solution and liposomal formulations respectively. Using the compartmental model to predict lymphatic exposure to longer time periods suggested that doxorubicin exposure to the lymphatic system would ultimately be 9796 times and 6.1 times greater after administration of dendrimer doxorubicin when compared to the solution and liposome formulations respectively. The recovery of doxorubicin in the sentinel lymph nodes draining the subcutaneous injection site was also quantified directly, and consistent with the lymph pharmacokinetic data, lymph node recovery was greatest for the dendrimer formulation (12% of dosed doxorubicin/g node) when compared to the liposome (1.4%/g node) and solution (<1%/g node) formulations. The data suggest that dendrimer-based drug delivery systems have the potential to enhance drug exposure to lymph-based drug targets such as lymphatic metastases.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dendrimer; Doxorubicin; Liposome; Lymphatic; PEGylated; Pharmacokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23954628     DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  13 in total

1.  A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Pulmonary Lymphatic Exposure of a Generation 4 PEGylated Dendrimer Following Intravenous and Aerosol Administration to Rats and Sheep.

Authors:  Gemma M Ryan; Robert J Bischof; Perenlei Enkhbaatar; Victoria M McLeod; Linda J Chan; Seth A Jones; David J Owen; Christopher J H Porter; Lisa M Kaminskas
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  From sewer to saviour - targeting the lymphatic system to promote drug exposure and activity.

Authors:  Natalie L Trevaskis; Lisa M Kaminskas; Christopher J H Porter
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Overcoming transport barriers for interstitial-, lymphatic-, and lymph node-targeted drug delivery.

Authors:  Susan N Thomas; Alex Schudel
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Eng       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 5.163

4.  Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic (MBPK) models describe the complex plasma kinetics of three antiretrovirals delivered by a long-acting anti-HIV drug combination nanoparticle formulation.

Authors:  John C Kraft; Lisa A McConnachie; Josefin Koehn; Loren Kinman; Jianguo Sun; Ann C Collier; Carol Collins; Danny D Shen; Rodney J Y Ho
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 5.  Progress and opportunities for enhancing the delivery and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  David M Francis; Susan N Thomas
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 15.470

6.  Indocyanine green nanoparticles undergo selective lymphatic uptake, distribution and retention and enable detailed mapping of lymph vessels, nodes and abnormalities.

Authors:  John C Kraft; Piper M Treuting; Rodney J Y Ho
Journal:  J Drug Target       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 5.121

Review 7.  Crossing the Blood-Brain Barrier: Advances in Nanoparticle Technology for Drug Delivery in Neuro-Oncology.

Authors:  Andrew M Hersh; Safwan Alomari; Betty M Tyler
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 8.  The janus facet of nanomaterials.

Authors:  Julianna Kardos; Katalin Jemnitz; István Jablonkai; Attila Bóta; Zoltán Varga; Júlia Visy; László Héja
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Local pelvic irradiation modulates Pharmacokinetics of 5-Fluorouracil in the plasma but not in the Lymphatic System.

Authors:  Chen-Hsi Hsieh; Mei-Ling Hou; Li-Ying Wang; Hung-Chi Tai; Tung-Hu Tsai; Yu-Jen Chen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Local Radiotherapy Affects Drug Pharmacokinetics-Exploration of a Neglected but Significant Uncertainty of Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Yu-Jen Chen; Tung-Hu Tsai; Li-Ying Wang; Chen-Hsi Hsieh
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.