PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare patient outcomes between a therapeutic versus a prophylactic gastrostomy tube (GT) placement approach in patients treated with concurrent systemic and radiation (SRT) therapy for head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS: Outcomes were compared between all HNC patients treated with concurrent SRT from January 2001 to June 2009 from a center that only places GTs therapeutically when clinically necessary (center A) versus a center that generally places them prophylactically (center B). RESULTS: A total of 445 patients with HNC were identified, with 63 % from center A. As anticipated, GTs were placed less commonly in center A compared to B (31 versus 88 %; p < 0.001). Center B had a significantly higher number of GT complications (p < 0.001), including infection (16 versus 5 %), leakage (10 versus 2 %), and blockage (3 versus 1 %). Conversely, center A had a higher admission rate (27 versus 13 %, p = 0.001), most prominent for GT-related issues (15 versus 6 %). Center B had higher GT dependence at 90 days post-radiation therapy (34 versus 12 %; p < 0.001), but not at 1 year (11 versus 10 %; p = 0.74). There was no significant difference in the proportion of head and neck patients who had a 10 % weight loss at 1 year (compared to baseline) between centers A and B (42 versus 53 %, p = 0.07). There was no significant difference in the overall survival (A versus B, HR = 0.99; p = 0.96). CONCLUSION: A prophylactic GT approach results in exposing higher number of patients to GT complications. The higher rate of hospitalizations using a therapeutic approach suggests that patients are sicker when GTs are required. Given the similar weight loss and survival, a therapeutic approach at an earlier stage of need may be a preferable approach, when access to prompt GT placement is available.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare patient outcomes between a therapeutic versus a prophylactic gastrostomy tube (GT) placement approach in patients treated with concurrent systemic and radiation (SRT) therapy for head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS: Outcomes were compared between all HNC patients treated with concurrent SRT from January 2001 to June 2009 from a center that only places GTs therapeutically when clinically necessary (center A) versus a center that generally places them prophylactically (center B). RESULTS: A total of 445 patients with HNC were identified, with 63 % from center A. As anticipated, GTs were placed less commonly in center A compared to B (31 versus 88 %; p < 0.001). Center B had a significantly higher number of GT complications (p < 0.001), including infection (16 versus 5 %), leakage (10 versus 2 %), and blockage (3 versus 1 %). Conversely, center A had a higher admission rate (27 versus 13 %, p = 0.001), most prominent for GT-related issues (15 versus 6 %). Center B had higher GT dependence at 90 days post-radiation therapy (34 versus 12 %; p < 0.001), but not at 1 year (11 versus 10 %; p = 0.74). There was no significant difference in the proportion of head and neck patients who had a 10 % weight loss at 1 year (compared to baseline) between centers A and B (42 versus 53 %, p = 0.07). There was no significant difference in the overall survival (A versus B, HR = 0.99; p = 0.96). CONCLUSION: A prophylactic GT approach results in exposing higher number of patients to GT complications. The higher rate of hospitalizations using a therapeutic approach suggests that patients are sicker when GTs are required. Given the similar weight loss and survival, a therapeutic approach at an earlier stage of need may be a preferable approach, when access to prompt GT placement is available.
Authors: Allen M Chen; Bao-Qing Li; Derick H Lau; D Gregory Farwell; Quang Luu; Kerri Stuart; Kathleen Newman; James A Purdy; Srinivasan Vijayakumar Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Marie-Astrid Piquet; Mahmut Ozsahin; Isabelle Larpin; Abderrahim Zouhair; Pauline Coti; May Monney; Philippe Monnier; René-Olivier Mirimanoff; Michel Roulet Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2002-08-02 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: D G Grant; P T Bradley; D D Pothier; D Bailey; S Caldera; D L Baldwin; M A Birchall Journal: Clin Otolaryngol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 2.597
Authors: Johanna Ruohoalho; Katri Aro; Antti A Mäkitie; Timo Atula; Aaro Haapaniemi; Harri Keski-Säntti; Leena Kylänpää; Annika Takala; Leif J Bäck Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Stephanie M Shaw; Heather Flowers; Brian O'Sullivan; Andrew Hope; Louis W C Liu; Rosemary Martino Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 3.438
Authors: Beth M Beadle; Kai-Ping Liao; Sharon H Giordano; Adam S Garden; Katherine A Hutcheson; Stephen Y Lai; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-09-23 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Teresa E Brown; Merrilyn D Banks; Brett G M Hughes; Charles Y Lin; Lizbeth M Kenny; Judith D Bauer Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2017-05-23 Impact factor: 7.640