PURPOSE: To determine the effect of prophylactic gastrostomy tube (GT) placement on acute and long-term outcome for patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred twenty consecutive patients were treated with chemoradiotherapy for Stage III/IV head and neck cancer to a median dose of 70 Gy (range, 64-74 Gy). The most common primary site was the oropharynx (66 patients). Sixty-seven patients (56%) were treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Seventy patients (58%) received prophylactic GT placement at the discretion of the physician before initiation of chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: Prophylactic GT placement significantly reduced weight loss during radiation therapy from 43 pounds (range, 0 to 76 pounds) to 19 pounds (range, 0 to 51 pounds), which corresponded to a net change of -14% (range, 0% to -30%) and -8% (range, +1% to -22%) from baseline, respectively (p < 0.001). However, the proportion of patients who were GT-dependent at 6- and 12-months after treatment was 41% and 21%, respectively, compared with 8% and 0%, respectively, for those with and without prophylactic GT (p < 0.001). Additionally, prophylactic GT was associated with a significantly higher incidence of late esophageal stricture compared with those who did not have prophylactic GT (30% vs. 6%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although prophylactic GT placement was effective at preventing acute weight loss and the need for intravenous hydration, it was also associated with significantly higher rates of late esophageal toxicity. The benefits of this strategy must be balanced with the risks.
PURPOSE: To determine the effect of prophylactic gastrostomy tube (GT) placement on acute and long-term outcome for patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred twenty consecutive patients were treated with chemoradiotherapy for Stage III/IV head and neck cancer to a median dose of 70 Gy (range, 64-74 Gy). The most common primary site was the oropharynx (66 patients). Sixty-seven patients (56%) were treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Seventy patients (58%) received prophylactic GT placement at the discretion of the physician before initiation of chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: Prophylactic GT placement significantly reduced weight loss during radiation therapy from 43 pounds (range, 0 to 76 pounds) to 19 pounds (range, 0 to 51 pounds), which corresponded to a net change of -14% (range, 0% to -30%) and -8% (range, +1% to -22%) from baseline, respectively (p < 0.001). However, the proportion of patients who were GT-dependent at 6- and 12-months after treatment was 41% and 21%, respectively, compared with 8% and 0%, respectively, for those with and without prophylactic GT (p < 0.001). Additionally, prophylactic GT was associated with a significantly higher incidence of late esophageal stricture compared with those who did not have prophylactic GT (30% vs. 6%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although prophylactic GT placement was effective at preventing acute weight loss and the need for intravenous hydration, it was also associated with significantly higher rates of late esophageal toxicity. The benefits of this strategy must be balanced with the risks.
Authors: Lisette van der Molen; Maya A van Rossum; Coen R N Rasch; Ludi E Smeele; Frans J M Hilgers Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2013-07-28 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: S A C Kraaijenga; L van der Molen; M M Stuiver; H J Teertstra; F J M Hilgers; M W M van den Brekel Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2015-04-04 Impact factor: 3.438
Authors: David O Francis; Eric Hall; Jennifer H Dang; Gregory R Vlacich; James L Netterville; Michael F Vaezi Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Johanna Ruohoalho; Katri Aro; Antti A Mäkitie; Timo Atula; Aaro Haapaniemi; Harri Keski-Säntti; Leena Kylänpää; Annika Takala; Leif J Bäck Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Omar K Jilani; Prabhsimranjot Singh; A Gabriella Wernicke; David I Kutler; William Kuhel; Paul Christos; Dattatreyudu Nori; Albert Sabbas; Ks Clifford Chao; Bhupesh Parashar Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Sophie A C Kraaijenga; Lisette van der Molen; Irene Jacobi; Olga Hamming-Vrieze; Frans J M Hilgers; Michiel W M van den Brekel Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2014-11-08 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: William G Albergotti; Kara S Davis; Shira Abberbock; Julie E Bauman; James Ohr; David A Clump; Dwight E Heron; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Seungwon Kim; Jonas T Johnson; Robert L Ferris Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Beth M Beadle; Kai-Ping Liao; Sharon H Giordano; Adam S Garden; Katherine A Hutcheson; Stephen Y Lai; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-09-23 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Diane Wenhua Chen; Jan S Lewin; Li Xu; Stephen Y Lai; G Brandon Gunn; Clifton David Fuller; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Aasheesh Kanwar; Erich M Sturgis; Katherine A Hutcheson Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 3.497