Literature DB >> 20633609

Variability in the effector-specific pattern of motor facilitation during the observation of everyday actions: implications for the clinical use of action observation.

S Hétu1, M Gagné, P L Jackson, C Mercier.   

Abstract

Action observation is increasingly considered as a rehabilitation tool as it can increase the cortical excitability of muscles involved in the observed movements and therefore produce effector-specific motor facilitation. In order to investigate the action observation mechanisms, simple single joint intransitive movements have commonly been used. Still, how the observation of everyday movements which often are the prime target of rehabilitation affects the observer cortical excitability remains unclear. Using transcranial magnetic stimulations, we aimed at verifying if the observation of everyday movements made by the proximal or distal upper-limb produces effector-specific motor facilitation in proximal (arm) and distal (hand) muscles of healthy subjects. Results suggest that, similar to simple intransitive movements, observation of more complex everyday movements involving mainly the proximal or distal part of upper limb induces different patterns of motor facilitation across upper limb muscles (P=0.02). However, we observed large inter-individual variability in the strength of the effector-specific motor facilitation induced by action observation. Yet, subjects had similar types of response (strong or weak effector-specific effects) when watching proximal or distal movements indicating that the facilitation pattern was highly consistent within subjects (r=0.83-0.88, P<0.001). This suggests that some individuals are better than other at precisely mapping the observed movements on their motor repertoire and that this type of response holds for various types of everyday actions. Copyright 2010 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20633609     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of Activation Patterns in Mirror Neurons and the Swallowing Network During Action Observation and Execution: A Task-Based fMRI Study.

Authors:  Ying-Hua Jing; Tuo Lin; Wan-Qi Li; Cheng Wu; Xue Li; Qian Ding; Man-Feng Wu; Guang-Qing Xu; Yue Lan
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  The motor system resonates to the distal goal of observed actions: testing the inverse pliers paradigm in an ecological setting.

Authors:  Luigi Cattaneo; Francesca Maule; Guido Barchiesi; Giacomo Rizzolatti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Modulation of brain activity during action observation: influence of perspective, transitivity and meaningfulness.

Authors:  Sébastien Hétu; Catherine Mercier; Fanny Eugène; Pierre-Emmanuel Michon; Philip L Jackson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  BDNF Val66Met Polymorphism Influences Visuomotor Associative Learning and the Sensitivity to Action Observation.

Authors:  Vincent Taschereau-Dumouchel; Sébastien Hétu; Pierre-Emmanuel Michon; Etienne Vachon-Presseau; Elsa Massicotte; Louis De Beaumont; Shirley Fecteau; Judes Poirier; Catherine Mercier; Yvon C Chagnon; Philip L Jackson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Watch, Imagine, Attempt: Motor Cortex Single-Unit Activity Reveals Context-Dependent Movement Encoding in Humans With Tetraplegia.

Authors:  Carlos E Vargas-Irwin; Jessica M Feldman; Brandon King; John D Simeral; Brittany L Sorice; Erin M Oakley; Sydney S Cash; Emad N Eskandar; Gerhard M Friehs; Leigh R Hochberg; John P Donoghue
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Behavioral and TMS Markers of Action Observation Might Reflect Distinct Neuronal Processes.

Authors:  Sébastien Hétu; Vincent Taschereau-Dumouchel; Hadj Boumediene Meziane; Philip L Jackson; Catherine Mercier
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.