John R Blosnich1, Janel Hanmer, Lan Yu, Derrick D Matthews, Dio Kavalieratos. 1. *Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System †Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health ‡Division of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine §Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prior research documents disparities between sexual minority and nonsexual minority individuals regarding health behaviors and health services utilization. However, little is known regarding differences in the prevalence of medical conditions. OBJECTIVES: To examine associations between sexual minority status and medical conditions. RESEARCH DESIGN: We conducted multiple logistic regression analyses of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2003-2011). We identified individuals who reported being partnered with an individual of the same sex, and constructed a matched cohort of individuals in opposite-sex partnerships. SUBJECTS: A total of 494 individuals in same-sex partnerships and 494 individuals in opposite-sex partnerships. MEASURES: Measures of health risk (eg, smoking status), health services utilization (eg, physician office visits), and presence of 15 medical conditions (eg, cancer, diabetes, arthritis, HIV, alcohol disorders). RESULTS: Same-sex partnered men had nearly 4 times the odds of reporting a mood disorder than did opposite-sex partnered men [adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=3.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.85-8.48]. Compared with opposite-sex partnered women, same-sex partnered women had greater odds of heart disease (aOR=2.59; 95% CI, 1.19-5.62), diabetes (aOR=2.75; 95% CI, 1.10-6.90), obesity (aOR=1.92; 95% CI, 1.26-2.94), high cholesterol (aOR=1.89; 95% CI, 1.03-3.50), and asthma (aOR=1.90; 95% CI, 1.02-1.19). Even after adjusting for sociodemographics, health risk behaviors, and health conditions, individuals in same-sex partnerships had 67% increased odds of past-year emergency department utilization and 51% greater odds of ≥3 physician visits in the last year compared with opposite-sex partnered individuals. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of individual-level, provider-level, and system-level approaches are needed to reduce disparities in medical conditions and health care utilization among sexual minority individuals.
BACKGROUND: Prior research documents disparities between sexual minority and nonsexual minority individuals regarding health behaviors and health services utilization. However, little is known regarding differences in the prevalence of medical conditions. OBJECTIVES: To examine associations between sexual minority status and medical conditions. RESEARCH DESIGN: We conducted multiple logistic regression analyses of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2003-2011). We identified individuals who reported being partnered with an individual of the same sex, and constructed a matched cohort of individuals in opposite-sex partnerships. SUBJECTS: A total of 494 individuals in same-sex partnerships and 494 individuals in opposite-sex partnerships. MEASURES: Measures of health risk (eg, smoking status), health services utilization (eg, physician office visits), and presence of 15 medical conditions (eg, cancer, diabetes, arthritis, HIV, alcohol disorders). RESULTS: Same-sex partnered men had nearly 4 times the odds of reporting a mood disorder than did opposite-sex partnered men [adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=3.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.85-8.48]. Compared with opposite-sex partnered women, same-sex partnered women had greater odds of heart disease (aOR=2.59; 95% CI, 1.19-5.62), diabetes (aOR=2.75; 95% CI, 1.10-6.90), obesity (aOR=1.92; 95% CI, 1.26-2.94), high cholesterol (aOR=1.89; 95% CI, 1.03-3.50), and asthma (aOR=1.90; 95% CI, 1.02-1.19). Even after adjusting for sociodemographics, health risk behaviors, and health conditions, individuals in same-sex partnerships had 67% increased odds of past-year emergency department utilization and 51% greater odds of ≥3 physician visits in the last year compared with opposite-sex partnered individuals. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of individual-level, provider-level, and system-level approaches are needed to reduce disparities in medical conditions and health care utilization among sexual minority individuals.
Authors: Katherine A Hill; Elizabeth A Samuels; Cary P Gross; Mayur M Desai; Nicole Sitkin Zelin; Darin Latimore; Stephen J Huot; Laura D Cramer; Ambrose H Wong; Dowin Boatright Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Natalie M Wittlin; John F Dovidio; Sara E Burke; Julia M Przedworski; Jeph Herrin; Liselotte Dyrbye; Ivuoma N Onyeador; Sean M Phelan; Michelle van Ryn Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2019-08-04 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Christina Dyar; Tenille C Taggart; Craig Rodriguez-Seijas; Ronald G Thompson; Jennifer C Elliott; Deborah S Hasin; Nicholas R Eaton Journal: Arch Sex Behav Date: 2018-04-09
Authors: Tess Thompson; Katie Heiden-Rootes; Miriam Joseph; L Anne Gilmore; LaShaune Johnson; Christine M Proulx; Emily L Albright; Maria Brown; Jane A McElroy Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2020-07-18 Impact factor: 4.634