Literature DB >> 23948000

Denial of abortion because of provider gestational age limits in the United States.

Ushma D Upadhyay1, Tracy A Weitz, Rachel K Jones, Rana E Barar, Diana Greene Foster.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We examined the factors influencing delay in seeking abortion and the outcomes for women denied abortion care because of gestational age limits at abortion facilities.
METHODS: We compared women who presented for abortion care who were under the facilities' gestational age limits and received an abortion (n = 452) with those who were just over the gestational age limits and were denied an abortion (n = 231) at 30 US facilities. We described reasons for delay in seeking services. We examined the determinants of obtaining an abortion elsewhere after being denied one because of facility gestational age limits. We then estimated the national incidence of being denied an abortion because of facility gestational age limits.
RESULTS: Adolescents and women who did not recognize their pregnancies early were most likely to delay seeking care. The most common reason for delay was having to raise money for travel and procedure costs. We estimated that each year more than 4000 US women are denied an abortion because of facility gestational limits and must carry unwanted pregnancies to term.
CONCLUSIONS: Many state laws restrict abortions based on gestational age, and new laws are lowering limits further. The incidence of being denied abortion will likely increase, disproportionately affecting young and poor women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23948000      PMCID: PMC4151926          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   11.561


  22 in total

1.  Obstacles to the integration of abortion into obstetrics and gynecology practice.

Authors:  Lori Freedman; Uta Landy; Philip Darney; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2010-09

2.  Abortion in the United States: incidence and access to services, 2005.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones; Mia R S Zolna; Stanley K Henshaw; Lawrence B Finer
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2008-03

3.  Abortion services in the United States, 1987 and 1988.

Authors:  S K Henshaw; J Van Vort
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1990 May-Jun

4.  Abortion surveillance--United States, 2008.

Authors:  Karen Pazol; Suzanne B Zane; Wilda Y Parker; Laura R Hall; Cynthia Berg; Douglas A Cook
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2011-11-25

5.  The characteristics and prior contraceptive use of U.S. abortion patients.

Authors:  S K Henshaw; J Silverman
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug

6.  Alcohol, tobacco and drug use as reasons for abortion.

Authors:  Sarah C M Roberts; Lyndsay Ammon Avalos; Danielle Sinkford; Diana Greene Foster
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.826

7.  Patient costs for medication abortion: results from a study of five clinical practices.

Authors:  Stephanie L Van Bebber; Kathryn A Phillips; Tracy A Weitz; Heather Gould; Felicia Stewart
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb

8.  The effects of pregnancy planning status on birth outcomes and infant care.

Authors:  K Kost; D J Landry; J E Darroch
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct

Review 9.  The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Jessica D Gipson; Michael A Koenig; Michelle J Hindin
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2008-03

10.  Consequences for infants of parental disagreement in pregnancy intention.

Authors:  Sanders Korenman; Robert Kaestner; Ted Joyce
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug
View more
  52 in total

Review 1.  Absent cavum septum pellucidum: a review with emphasis on associated commissural abnormalities.

Authors:  Dinesh K Sundarakumar; Sarah A Farley; Crysela M Smith; Kenneth R Maravilla; Manjiri K Dighe; Jason N Nixon
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-06-27

2.  Implications of Georgia's 20-Week Abortion Ban.

Authors:  Sarah C M Roberts; Heather Gould; Ushma D Upadhyay
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Comparison of Health, Development, Maternal Bonding, and Poverty Among Children Born After Denial of Abortion vs After Pregnancies Subsequent to an Abortion.

Authors:  Diana Greene Foster; M Antonia Biggs; Sarah Raifman; Jessica Gipson; Katrina Kimport; Corinne H Rocca
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 16.193

4.  Abortion Stigma Among Low-Income Women Obtaining Abortions in Western Pennsylvania: A Qualitative Assessment.

Authors:  Amanda Gelman; Elian A Rosenfeld; Cara Nikolajski; Lori R Freedman; Julia R Steinberg; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2016-12-16

5.  Receiving Versus Being Denied a Pregnancy Termination and Subsequent Alcohol Use: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Sarah C M Roberts; Kevin Delucchi; Sharon C Wilsnack; Diana Greene Foster
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.826

6.  A comparison of depression and anxiety symptom trajectories between women who had an abortion and women denied one.

Authors:  D G Foster; J R Steinberg; S C M Roberts; J Neuhaus; M A Biggs
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 7.723

7.  Mental Health Diagnoses 3 Years After Receiving or Being Denied an Abortion in the United States.

Authors:  M Antonia Biggs; John M Neuhaus; Diana G Foster
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Dramatic Decreases in US Abortion Rates: Public Health Achievement or Failure?

Authors:  Diana Greene Foster
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  TRAP laws and the invisible labor of US abortion providers.

Authors:  Rebecca J Mercier; Mara Buchbinder; Amy Bryant
Journal:  Crit Public Health       Date:  2015-08-19

10.  Moderators and mediators of the relationship between receiving versus being denied a pregnancy termination and subsequent binge drinking.

Authors:  S C M Roberts; M S Subbaraman; K L Delucchi; S C Wilsnack; D G Foster
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.