Kathleen M Mazor1, Bridget Gaglio, Larissa Nekhlyudov, Gwen L Alexander, Azadeh Stark, Mark C Hornbrook, Kathleen Walsh, Jennifer Boggs, Celeste A Lemay, Cassandra Firneno, Colleen Biggins, Mary Ann Blosky, Neeraj K Arora. 1. Meyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester; Harvard Medical School; Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Boston, MA; Mid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute/Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States, Rockville, MD; Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI; Geisinger Health System; Henry Hood Center for Health Research, Danville; School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; The Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR; Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO; and National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Patient-centered communication is critical to quality cancer care. Effective communication can help patients and family members cope with cancer, make informed decisions, and effectively manage their care; suboptimal communication can contribute to care breakdowns and undermine clinician-patient relationships. The study purpose was to explore stakeholders' views on the feasibility and acceptability of collecting self-reported patient and family perceptions of communication experiences while receiving cancer care. The results were intended to inform the design, development, and implementation of a structured and generalizable patient-level reporting system. METHODS: This was a formative, qualitative study that used semistructured interviews with cancer patients, family members, clinicians, and leaders of health care organizations. The constant comparative method was used to identify major themes in the interview transcripts. RESULTS: A total of 106 stakeholders were interviewed. Thematic saturation was achieved. All stakeholders recognized the importance of communication and endorsed efforts to improve communication during cancer care. Patients, clinicians, and leaders expressed concerns about the potential consequences of reports of suboptimal communication experiences, such as damage to the clinician-patient relationship, and the need for effective improvement strategies. Patients and family members would report good communication experiences in order to encourage such practices. Practical and logistic issues were identified. CONCLUSION: Patient reports of their communication experiences during cancer care could increase understanding of the communication process, stimulate improvements, inform interventions, and provide a basis for evaluating changes in communication practices. This qualitative study provides a foundation for the design and pilot testing of such a patient reporting system.
PURPOSE:Patient-centered communication is critical to quality cancer care. Effective communication can help patients and family members cope with cancer, make informed decisions, and effectively manage their care; suboptimal communication can contribute to care breakdowns and undermine clinician-patient relationships. The study purpose was to explore stakeholders' views on the feasibility and acceptability of collecting self-reported patient and family perceptions of communication experiences while receiving cancer care. The results were intended to inform the design, development, and implementation of a structured and generalizable patient-level reporting system. METHODS: This was a formative, qualitative study that used semistructured interviews with cancerpatients, family members, clinicians, and leaders of health care organizations. The constant comparative method was used to identify major themes in the interview transcripts. RESULTS: A total of 106 stakeholders were interviewed. Thematic saturation was achieved. All stakeholders recognized the importance of communication and endorsed efforts to improve communication during cancer care. Patients, clinicians, and leaders expressed concerns about the potential consequences of reports of suboptimal communication experiences, such as damage to the clinician-patient relationship, and the need for effective improvement strategies. Patients and family members would report good communication experiences in order to encourage such practices. Practical and logistic issues were identified. CONCLUSION:Patient reports of their communication experiences during cancer care could increase understanding of the communication process, stimulate improvements, inform interventions, and provide a basis for evaluating changes in communication practices. This qualitative study provides a foundation for the design and pilot testing of such a patient reporting system.
Authors: John Z Ayanian; Alan M Zaslavsky; Edward Guadagnoli; Charles S Fuchs; Kathleen J Yost; Cynthia M Creech; Rosemary D Cress; Lilia C O'Connor; Dee W West; William E Wright Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-08-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gerald P Whelan; John R Boulet; Danette W McKinley; John J Norcini; Marta van Zanten; Ronald K Hambleton; William P Burdick; Steven J Peitzman Journal: Med Teach Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 3.650
Authors: Edward H Wagner; Sarah M Greene; Gene Hart; Terry S Field; Suzanne Fletcher; Ann M Geiger; Lisa J Herrinton; Mark C Hornbrook; Christine C Johnson; Judy Mouchawar; Sharon J Rolnick; Victor J Stevens; Stephen H Taplin; Dennis Tolsma; Thomas M Vogt Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr Date: 2005
Authors: Kathleen M Mazor; Douglas W Roblin; Sarah M Greene; Celeste A Lemay; Cassandra L Firneno; Josephine Calvi; Carolyn D Prouty; Kathryn Horner; Thomas H Gallagher Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-04-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sapna Kaul; Mark Fluchel; Holly Spraker-Perlman; Christopher F Parmeter; Anne C Kirchhoff Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-04-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Yuhree Kim; Megan Winner; Andrew Page; Diana M Tisnado; Kathryn A Martinez; Stefan Buettner; Aslam Ejaz; Gaya Spolverato; Sydney E Morss Dy; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-06-19 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kathleen M Mazor; Richard L Street; Valerie M Sue; Andrew E Williams; Borsika A Rabin; Neeraj K Arora Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2016-03-06
Authors: Kathleen M Mazor; Reneé L Beard; Gwen L Alexander; Neeraj K Arora; Cassandra Firneno; Bridget Gaglio; Sarah M Greene; Celeste A Lemay; Brandi E Robinson; Douglas W Roblin; Kathleen Walsh; Richard L Street; Thomas H Gallagher Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2013-06-18 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Trine Stub; Sara A Quandt; Thomas A Arcury; Joanne C Sandberg; Agnete E Kristoffersen; Frauke Musial; Anita Salamonsen Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 3.659