Literature DB >> 15476987

Towards better communication in cancer care: a framework for developing evidence-based interventions.

Penelope E Schofield1, Phyllis N Butow.   

Abstract

Increasing recognition of the complexity and difficulty of communication in patient care has led to a burgeoning but chaotic literature that tends to be incomplete on any one topic. A co-ordinated, planned approach is required to facilitate the rapid development and implementation of evidence-based interventions in this area. We propose a seven-stage model of communication research that is designed to provide clear directions to improve communication in cancer care. The stages are: (1) identification of communication difficulties; (2) documentation of patient and clinician views; (3) identification of practices associated with better outcomes; (4) the development of evidence-based guidelines and interventions; (5) testing the effectiveness of the intervention in changing current practice and improving patient outcomes; (6) dissemination of the effective interventions; and (7) broad adoption of the intervention. Examples are provided for each stage of research to elucidate the type of study proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15476987     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  18 in total

1.  Media messages about cancer: what do people understand?

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Josephine Calvi; Rebecca Cowan; Mary E Costanza; Paul K J Han; Sarah M Greene; Laura Saccoccio; Erica Cove; Douglas Roblin; Andrew Williams
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2010

Review 2.  Factors in quality care--the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests--problems in the steps and interfaces of care.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Stephen H Taplin; Rebecca Anhang Price; Caroline Cranos; Robin Yabroff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

3.  Patient perceptions of communications on the threshold of cancer survivorship: implications for provider responses.

Authors:  Sally E Thorne; Kelli I Stajduhar
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Physicians' colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns.

Authors:  Jane M Zapka; Carrie N Klabunde; Neeraj K Arora; Gigi Yuan; Judith Lee Smith; Sarah C Kobrin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Physician-related facilitators and barriers to patient involvement in treatment decision making in early stage breast cancer: perspectives of physicians and patients.

Authors:  Mary Ann O'Brien; Peter M Ellis; Timothy J Whelan; Cathy Charles; Amiram Gafni; Peter Lovrics; Som D Mukherjee; Nicole Hodgson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Disclosing a diagnosis of cancer: where and how does it occur?

Authors:  William D Figg; Erika K Smith; Douglas K Price; Bevin C English; Paul W Thurman; Seth M Steinberg; Ezekiel Emanuel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  An assessment of the likelihood, frequency, and content of verbal communication between radiologists and women receiving screening and diagnostic mammography.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Mark Kettler; Andrea J Cook; Berta M Geller; Leah Karliner; Diana L Miglioretti; Erin Aiello Bowles; Diana S Buist; Thomas H Gallagher; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Association of shared decision-making with type of breast cancer surgery: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Myung Kyung Lee; Dong Young Noh; Seok Jin Nam; Se Hyun Ahn; Byeong Woo Park; Eun Sook Lee; Young Ho Yun
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  The effects of a video-based education in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer in Singapore.

Authors:  May Leng Tan; Kim Hua Lee; Wei Sean Yong; Cheryl Rodgers
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests: considering the multilevel context of care.

Authors:  Jane M Zapka; Heather M Edwards; Veronica Chollette; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.