PURPOSE: To identify opportunities for improving care, we evaluated patients' perceptions of the quality of their cancer care by race, ethnicity, and language. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We surveyed a population-based cohort of 1,067 patients with colorectal cancer in northern California approximately 9 months after diagnosis. Adjusting for clinical and demographic factors, mean problem scores were analyzed on a 100-point scale for six domains of care. RESULTS: Mean problem scores were highest for health information (47.8), followed by treatment information (32.3), psychosocial care (31.7), coordination of care (21.3), confidence in providers (13.1), and access to cancer care (12.7). In adjusted comparisons with white patients, African American patients reported more problems with coordination of care (difference, 9.8; P < .001), psychosocial care (difference, 7.2; P = .03), access to care (difference, 6.6; P = .03), and health information (difference, 12.5; P < .001). Asian/Pacific Islander patients reported more problems than did white patients with coordination of care (difference, 13.2; P < .001), access to care (difference, 15.5; P < .001), and health information (difference, 12.6; P = .004). Hispanic patients tended to report more problems with coordination of care (difference, 4.4; P = .06), access to care (difference, 5.8; P = .08), and treatment information (difference, 7.0; P = .06). Non-English-speaking white patients reported more problems than other white patients with coordination of care (difference, 21.9; P < .001), psychosocial care (difference, 16.1; P = .009), access to care (difference, 19.8; P = .003), and treatment information (difference, 17.8; P = .002). Non-English-speaking Hispanic patients reported more problems than other Hispanic patients with confidence in providers (difference, 16.9; P = .01). CONCLUSION: Efforts to improve patients' experiences with cancer care should address disparities by race, ethnicity, and language, particularly in coordination of care, access to care, and the provision of relevant information.
PURPOSE: To identify opportunities for improving care, we evaluated patients' perceptions of the quality of their cancer care by race, ethnicity, and language. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We surveyed a population-based cohort of 1,067 patients with colorectal cancer in northern California approximately 9 months after diagnosis. Adjusting for clinical and demographic factors, mean problem scores were analyzed on a 100-point scale for six domains of care. RESULTS: Mean problem scores were highest for health information (47.8), followed by treatment information (32.3), psychosocial care (31.7), coordination of care (21.3), confidence in providers (13.1), and access to cancer care (12.7). In adjusted comparisons with white patients, African American patients reported more problems with coordination of care (difference, 9.8; P < .001), psychosocial care (difference, 7.2; P = .03), access to care (difference, 6.6; P = .03), and health information (difference, 12.5; P < .001). Asian/Pacific Islander patients reported more problems than did white patients with coordination of care (difference, 13.2; P < .001), access to care (difference, 15.5; P < .001), and health information (difference, 12.6; P = .004). Hispanic patients tended to report more problems with coordination of care (difference, 4.4; P = .06), access to care (difference, 5.8; P = .08), and treatment information (difference, 7.0; P = .06). Non-English-speaking white patients reported more problems than other white patients with coordination of care (difference, 21.9; P < .001), psychosocial care (difference, 16.1; P = .009), access to care (difference, 19.8; P = .003), and treatment information (difference, 17.8; P = .002). Non-English-speaking Hispanic patients reported more problems than other Hispanic patients with confidence in providers (difference, 16.9; P = .01). CONCLUSION: Efforts to improve patients' experiences with cancer care should address disparities by race, ethnicity, and language, particularly in coordination of care, access to care, and the provision of relevant information.
Authors: Sarah T Hawley; Nancy K Janz; Sarah E Lillie; Christopher R Friese; Jennifer J Griggs; John J Graff; Ann S Hamilton; Sarika Jain; Steven J Katz Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2010-11-12
Authors: Elyse R Park; Sandra J Japuntich; Nancy A Rigotti; Lara Traeger; Yulei He; Robert B Wallace; Jennifer L Malin; Jennifer P Zallen; Nancy L Keating Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-01-23 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Michael A Preston; Glen P Mays; Rise' D Jones; Sharla A Smith; Chara N Stewart; Ronda S Henry-Tillman Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2014-02
Authors: Patricia I Moreno; Amelie G Ramirez; Sandra L San Miguel-Majors; Rina S Fox; Leopoldo Castillo; Kipling J Gallion; Edgar Munoz; Ryne Estabrook; Arely Perez; Thomas Lad; Courtney Hollowell; Frank J Penedo Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Nhi-Ha T Trinh; Patrick N Hagan; Katherine Flaherty; Lara N Traeger; Aya Inamori; Charlotte D Brill; Katherine Hails; Trina E Chang; C Andres Bedoya; Maurizio Fava; Albert Yeung Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2014-12
Authors: Kimberly A Miller; Katherine Y Wojcik; Cynthia N Ramirez; Anamara Ritt-Olson; David R Freyer; Ann S Hamilton; Joel E Milam Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2016-08-27 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Elyse R Park; Jan E Mutchler; Giselle Perez; Roberta E Goldman; Halsey Niles; Vivian Haime; Cheyenne Fox Tree-McGrath; Mai See Yang; Daniel Woolridge; July Suarez; Karen Donelan; William F Pirl Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 3.894