BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are frequently characterized by KIT overexpression. Tumor-free margins and complete cytoreduction of disease are mainstays of treatment. We hypothesized that fluorescently labeled anti-KIT antibodies can label GIST in vivo. METHODS: KIT K641E(+/-) transgenic mice that spontaneously develop cecal GISTs were used in this study, with C57BL/6 mice serving as controls. Alexa 488 fluorophore-conjugated anti-KIT antibodies were delivered via the tail vein 24 h prior to fluorescence imaging. Following fluorescence laparoscopy, mice were sacrificed. The gastrointestinal tracts were grossly examined for tumors followed by fluorescence imaging. Tumors were harvested for histologic confirmation. RESULTS: KIT K641E(+/-) mice and C57BL/6 control mice received anti-KIT antibody or isotope control antibody. Fluorescence laparoscopy had a high tumor signal-to-background noise ratio. Upon blinded review of intravital fluorescence and bright light images, there were 2 false-positive and 0 false-negative results. The accuracy was 92 %. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 100, 87, 85, and 100 %, respectively, for the combined modalities. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we present a method for in vivo fluorescence labeling of GIST in a murine model. Several translatable applications include: laparoscopic staging; visualization of peritoneal metastases; assessment of margin status; endoscopic differentiation of GISTs from other benign submucosal tumors; and longitudinal surveillance of disease response. This novel approach has clear clinical applications that warrant further research and development.
BACKGROUND:Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are frequently characterized by KIT overexpression. Tumor-free margins and complete cytoreduction of disease are mainstays of treatment. We hypothesized that fluorescently labeled anti-KIT antibodies can label GIST in vivo. METHODS:KITK641E(+/-) transgenic mice that spontaneously develop cecal GISTs were used in this study, with C57BL/6 mice serving as controls. Alexa 488 fluorophore-conjugated anti-KIT antibodies were delivered via the tail vein 24 h prior to fluorescence imaging. Following fluorescence laparoscopy, mice were sacrificed. The gastrointestinal tracts were grossly examined for tumors followed by fluorescence imaging. Tumors were harvested for histologic confirmation. RESULTS:KITK641E(+/-) mice and C57BL/6 control mice received anti-KIT antibody or isotope control antibody. Fluorescence laparoscopy had a high tumor signal-to-background noise ratio. Upon blinded review of intravital fluorescence and bright light images, there were 2 false-positive and 0 false-negative results. The accuracy was 92 %. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 100, 87, 85, and 100 %, respectively, for the combined modalities. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we present a method for in vivo fluorescence labeling of GIST in a murine model. Several translatable applications include: laparoscopic staging; visualization of peritoneal metastases; assessment of margin status; endoscopic differentiation of GISTs from other benign submucosal tumors; and longitudinal surveillance of disease response. This novel approach has clear clinical applications that warrant further research and development.
Authors: Chandrajit P Raut; Matthew Posner; Jayesh Desai; Jeffrey A Morgan; Suzanne George; David Zahrieh; Christopher D M Fletcher; George D Demetri; Monica M Bertagnolli Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sharmeela Kaushal; Michele K McElroy; George A Luiken; Mark A Talamini; A R Moossa; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-07-30 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Burton L Eisenberg; Jonathan Harris; Charles D Blanke; George D Demetri; Michael C Heinrich; James C Watson; John P Hoffman; Scott Okuno; John M Kane; Margaret von Mehren Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2009-01-01 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Michele McElroy; Sharmeela Kaushal; George A Luiken; Mark A Talamini; A R Moossa; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet Journal: World J Surg Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Ronald P Dematteo; Karla V Ballman; Cristina R Antonescu; Robert G Maki; Peter W T Pisters; George D Demetri; Martin E Blackstein; Charles D Blanke; Margaret von Mehren; Murray F Brennan; Shreyaskumar Patel; Martin D McCarter; Jonathan A Polikoff; Benjamin R Tan; Kouros Owzar Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Andrea Picchetto; Barbara Seeliger; Stefania La Rocca; Manuel Barberio; Giancarlo D'Ambrosio; Jacques Marescaux; Michele Diana Journal: Chirurg Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 0.955
Authors: Harvey Hensley; Karthik Devarajan; James R Johnson; David Piwnica-Worms; Andrew K Godwin; Margaret von Mehren; Lori Rink Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2014-04-22 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Jason K Sicklick; Partha Ray; Sudeep Banerjee; Hyunho Yoon; Mayra Yebra; Chih-Min Tang; Mara Gilardi; Jayanth S Shankara Narayanan; Rebekah R White Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Lindsay S Moore; Eben L Rosenthal; Esther de Boer; Andrew C Prince; Neel Patel; Joshua M Richman; Anthony B Morlandt; William R Carroll; Kurt R Zinn; Jason M Warram Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Yukihiko Hiroshima; Thinzar M Lwin; Takashi Murakami; Ali A Mawy; Tanaka Kuniya; Takashi Chishima; Itaru Endo; Bryan M Clary; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Thinzar M Lwin; Takashi Murakami; Kentaro Miyake; Paul J Yazaki; John E Shivley; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Floris P R Verbeek; Joost R van der Vorst; Quirijn R J G Tummers; Martin C Boonstra; Karien E de Rooij; Clemens W G M Löwik; A Rob P M Valentijn; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Hak Soo Choi; John V Frangioni; Alexander L Vahrmeijer Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-02-11 Impact factor: 5.344