Literature DB >> 23942388

Lithotrites and postoperative fever: does lithotrite type matter? Results from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study.

David I Chu1, Michael E Lipkin, Agnes J Wang, Michael N Ferrandino, Glenn M Preminger, Kittinut Kijvikai, Narmada P Gupta, Michael D Melekos, Jean J M C H de la Rosette.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risks of fever from different lithotrites after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) PNL database is a prospective, multi-institutional, international PNL registry. Of 5,803 total patients, 4,968 received preoperative antibiotics, were supplied with complete information and included in this analysis. The lithotrites assessed included no fragmentation, ultrasonic, laser, pneumatic and combination ultrasonic/pneumatic. Risk of fever was estimated using multivariate logistic regression with adjustment for diabetes, steroid use, a history of positive urine culture, the presence of staghorn calculi or preoperative nephrostomy, stone burden and lithotrite.
RESULTS: The overall fever rate was 10%. Pneumatic lithotrites were used in 43% of the cohort, followed by ultrasonic (24%), combination ultrasonic/pneumatic (17.3%), no fragmentation (8.4%) and laser (7.3%). Fever rates were no different between patients who underwent no or any fragmentation (p = 0.117), nor among patients when stratified by lithotrite (p = 0.429). On multivariate analysis, fragmentation was not significantly associated with fever [Odds Ratio (OR) 1.17, p = 0.413], while diabetes (OR 1.32, p = 0.048), positive urine culture (OR 2.08, p < 0.001), staghorn calculi (OR 1.80, p < 0.001) and nephrostomy (OR 1.65, p < 0.001) increased fever risk. Fever risk among lithotrites did not differ (p ≥ 0.128).
CONCLUSIONS: Risk of post-PNL fever was not significantly different among the various lithotrites used in the CROES PNL study.
Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23942388      PMCID: PMC5462457          DOI: 10.1159/000351752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  14 in total

1.  In vitro comparison of standard ultrasound and pneumatic lithotrites with a new combination intracorporeal lithotripsy device.

Authors:  Brian K Auge; Costas D Lallas; Paul K Pietrow; Pei Zhong; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy systemic inflammatory response: a prospective analysis of preoperative urine, renal pelvic urine and stone cultures.

Authors:  Ruslan Korets; Joseph A Graversen; Max Kates; Adam C Mues; Mantu Gupta
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Maurice Stephan Michel; Lutz Trojan; Jens Jochen Rassweiler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  The percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: classification of complications.

Authors:  Gaston Labate; Pranjal Modi; Anthony Timoney; Luigi Cormio; Xiaochun Zhang; Michael Louie; Magnus Grabe; Jean Rosette On Behalf Of The Croes Pcnl Study Group
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Importance of microbiological evaluation in management of infectious complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Hasan Serkan Dogan; Fuad Guliyev; Yesim S Cetinkaya; Mustafa Sofikerim; Ender Ozden; Ahmet Sahin
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients.

Authors:  Jean de la Rosette; Dean Assimos; Mahesh Desai; Jorge Gutierrez; James Lingeman; Roberto Scarpa; Ahmet Tefekli
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Factors affecting fever following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Murat Gonen; Hale Turan; Bulent Ozturk; Hakan Ozkardes
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Severe sepsis following percutaneous or endoscopic procedures for urinary tract stones.

Authors:  N K O'Keeffe; A J Mortimer; P A Sambrook; P N Rao
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1993-09

9.  Inactivation of bacteria inoculated inside urinary stone-phantoms using intracorporeal lithotripters.

Authors:  Jorge Gutiérrez; Ulises M Alvarez; Enrique Mues; Francisco Fernández; Gustavo Gómez; Achim M Loske
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2008-01-10

10.  Clinical significance of fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  J A Cadeddu; R Chen; J Bishoff; S Micali; A Kumar; R G Moore; L R Kavoussi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  3 in total

1.  Lessons learned from the CROES percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study.

Authors:  Guido M Kamphuis; Joyce Baard; Matias Westendarp; Jean J M C H de la Rosette
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Current trends of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a developing country.

Authors:  Carlos A Batagello; Fabio Carvalho Vicentini; Giovanni Scala Marchini; Fabio Cesar Miranda Torricelli; Miguel Srougi; Willian Carlos Nahas; Eduardo Mazzucchi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

3.  Current Trends in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in China: A Spot Survey.

Authors:  Yuguang Jiang; Jiqing Zhang; Ning Kang; Yinong Niu; Zhiwen Li; Changlian Yu; Junhui Zhang
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-06-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.