OBJECTIVES: Critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) was recently added to the US Recommended Uniform Screening Panel for newborns. This study assessed whether maternal/household and infant characteristics were associated with late CCHD detection. METHODS: This was a statewide, population-based, retrospective, observational study of infants with CCHD born between 1998 and 2007 identified by using the Florida Birth Defects Registry. We examined 12 CCHD conditions that are primary and secondary targets of newborn CCHD screening using pulse oximetry. We used Poisson regression models to analyze associations between selected characteristics (eg, CCHD type, birth hospital nursery level [highest level available in the hospital]) and late CCHD detection (defined as diagnosis after the birth hospitalization). RESULTS: Of 3603 infants with CCHD and linked hospitalizations, CCHD was not detected during the birth hospitalization for 22.9% (n = 825) of infants. The likelihood of late detection varied by CCHD condition. Infants born in a birth hospital with a level I nursery only (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.9 [95% confidence interval: 1.6-2.2]) or level II nursery (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.5 [95% confidence interval: 1.3-1.7]) were significantly more likely to have late-detected CCHD compared with infants born in a birth hospital with a level III (highest) nursery. CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for the selected characteristics, hospital nursery level seems to have an independent association with late CCHD detection. Thus, perhaps universal newborn screening for CCHD could be particularly beneficial in level I and II nurseries and may reduce differences in the frequency of late diagnosis between birth hospital facilities.
OBJECTIVES:Critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) was recently added to the US Recommended Uniform Screening Panel for newborns. This study assessed whether maternal/household and infant characteristics were associated with late CCHD detection. METHODS: This was a statewide, population-based, retrospective, observational study of infants with CCHD born between 1998 and 2007 identified by using the Florida Birth Defects Registry. We examined 12 CCHD conditions that are primary and secondary targets of newborn CCHD screening using pulse oximetry. We used Poisson regression models to analyze associations between selected characteristics (eg, CCHD type, birth hospital nursery level [highest level available in the hospital]) and late CCHD detection (defined as diagnosis after the birth hospitalization). RESULTS: Of 3603 infants with CCHD and linked hospitalizations, CCHD was not detected during the birth hospitalization for 22.9% (n = 825) of infants. The likelihood of late detection varied by CCHD condition. Infants born in a birth hospital with a level I nursery only (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.9 [95% confidence interval: 1.6-2.2]) or level II nursery (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.5 [95% confidence interval: 1.3-1.7]) were significantly more likely to have late-detected CCHD compared with infants born in a birth hospital with a level III (highest) nursery. CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for the selected characteristics, hospital nursery level seems to have an independent association with late CCHD detection. Thus, perhaps universal newborn screening for CCHD could be particularly beneficial in level I and II nurseries and may reduce differences in the frequency of late diagnosis between birth hospital facilities.
Authors: Cara T Mai; Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; Alissa O'Halloran; Janet D Cragan; Richard S Olney; Angela Lin; Marcia Feldkamp; Lorenzo D Botto; Russel Rickard; Marlene Anderka; Mary Ethen; Carol Stanton; Joan Ehrhardt; Mark Canfield Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2012-12
Authors: Cora Peterson; April Dawson; Scott D Grosse; Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; Richard S Olney; Jean Paul Tanner; Russell S Kirby; Jane A Correia; Sharon M Watkins; Cynthia H Cassell Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2013-09-02
Authors: Barbara Kathleen Frohnert; Richard Charles Lussky; Maureen Anne Alms; Nancy J Mendelsohn; Daniel Michael Symonik; Myron Clifford Falken Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Franklin Pereira; Alejandra Bueno; Andrea Rodriguez; Douglas Perrin; Gerald Marx; Michael Cardinale; Ivan Salgo; Pedro Del Nido Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2017-01-24
Authors: Ying Wang; Gang Liu; Mark A Canfield; Cara T Mai; Suzanne M Gilboa; Robert E Meyer; Marlene Anderka; Glenn E Copeland; James E Kucik; Wendy N Nembhard; Russell S Kirby Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Catherine P Benziger; Karen Stout; Elisa Zaragoza-Macias; Amelia Bertozzi-Villa; Abraham D Flaxman Journal: Popul Health Metr Date: 2015-10-15
Authors: Tiffany J Riehle-Colarusso; Lisa Bergersen; Craig S Broberg; Cynthia H Cassell; Darryl T Gray; Scott D Grosse; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Marshall L Jacobs; Russell S Kirby; Lazaros Kochilas; Asha Krishnaswamy; Arianne Marelli; Sara K Pasquali; Thalia Wood; Matthew E Oster Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2016-10-26 Impact factor: 5.501