Literature DB >> 23937453

Application of C-11-acetate positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging in prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

Beheshti Mohsen1, Treglia Giorgio, Zakavi Seyed Rasoul, Langsteger Werner, Ghodsi Rad Mohammad Ali, Dabbagh Kakhki Vahid Reza, Sadeghi Ramin.   

Abstract

To review the literature on the application of (11) C-acetate positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging in prostate cancer. We systematically reviewed the available literature and presented the results in meta-analysis format. PubMed, SCOPUS, ISI web of knowledge, Science Direct, Springer, and Google Scholar were searched with 'Acetate AND PET AND Prostate' as keywords. All studies that evaluated accuracy of (11) C-acetate imaging in primary or recurrent prostate cancer were included, if enough data could be extracted for calculation of sensitivity and/or specificity. In all, 23 studies were included in the study. For evaluation of primary tumour, pooled sensitivity was 75.1 (69.8-79.8)% and specificity was 75.8 (72.4-78.9)%. For detection of recurrence, sensitivity was 64 (59-69)% and specificity was 93 (83-98)%. Sensitivity for recurrence detection was higher in post-surgical vs post-radiotherapy patients and in patients with PSA at relapse of >1 ng/mL. Studies using PET/computed tomography vs PET also showed higher sensitivity for detection of recurrence. Imaging with (11) C-acetate PET can be useful in patients with prostate cancer. This is especially true for evaluation of patients at PSA relapse, although the sensitivity is overall low. For primary tumour evaluation (localisation of tumour in the prostate and differentiation of malignant from benign lesions), (11) C-acetate is of limited value due to low sensitivity and specificity. Due to the poor quality of the included studies, the results should be interpreted with caution and further high-quality studies are needed.
© 2013 The Authors. BJU International © 2013 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  11C-acetate; PET; meta-analysis; prostate cancer; systematic review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23937453     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  35 in total

1.  Malignant lipogenesis defined by 11C-acetate PET/CT predicts prostate cancer-specific survival in patients with biochemical relapse after prostatectomy.

Authors:  Naresh Regula; Michael Häggman; Silvia Johansson; Jens Sörensen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Advances in Imaging in Prostate and Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Abhishek Srivastava; Laura M Douglass; Victoria Chernyak; Kara L Watts
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Imaging of distant metastases of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Pesapane; Marcin Czarniecki; Matteo Basilio Suter; Baris Turkbey; Geert Villeirs
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 4.  Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Tobias Maurer; Matthias Eiber; Markus Schwaiger; Jürgen E Gschwend
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Novel Approaches to Imaging Tumor Metabolism.

Authors:  Sui-Seng Tee; Kayvan R Keshari
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 6.  Advances in medical imaging for the diagnosis and management of common genitourinary cancers.

Authors:  Mohammad H Bagheri; Mark A Ahlman; Liza Lindenberg; Baris Turkbey; Jeffrey Lin; Ali Cahid Civelek; Ashkan A Malayeri; Piyush K Agarwal; Peter L Choyke; Les R Folio; Andrea B Apolo
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  Comparative performance of PET tracers in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a critical analysis of literature.

Authors:  Chung Yao Yu; Bhushan Desai; Lingyun Ji; Susan Groshen; Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-09-06

Review 8.  [Focus on molecular imaging in prostate cancer].

Authors:  L Michaud; K A Touijer
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 0.915

Review 9.  Positron emission tomography in imaging evaluation of staging, restaging, treatment response, and prognosis in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-05

10.  Comparison of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Based 18F-DCFBC PET/CT to Conventional Imaging Modalities for Detection of Hormone-Naïve and Castration-Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Steven P Rowe; Katarzyna J Macura; Anthony Ciarallo; Esther Mena; Amanda Blackford; Rosa Nadal; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Mario A Eisenberger; Michael A Carducci; Ashley E Ross; Philip W Kantoff; Daniel P Holt; Robert F Dannals; Ronnie C Mease; Martin G Pomper; Steve Y Cho
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.