Naresh Regula1, Michael Häggman2, Silvia Johansson3, Jens Sörensen4,5. 1. Section of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 2. Section of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 3. Section of Oncology, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 4. Section of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. jens.sorensen@pet.uu.se. 5. PET Center Research Department, no. 79, 5th floor, Akademiska Sjukhuset, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden. jens.sorensen@pet.uu.se.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Malignant de novo lipogenesis is strongly linked to the aggressiveness of prostate cancer (PCa) under experimental conditions. 11C-Acetate PET/CT is a potential noninvasive biomarker of malignant lipogenesis in PCa, but its prognostic value is not known. The objective of this study was to analyse 11C-acetate PET/CT image metrics in relation to survival. METHODS: All patients undergoing 11C-acetate PET/CT in one university hospital from 2005 to 2011 due to PSA relapse after previous prostatectomy were retrospectively evaluated. Two groups of patients were compared: those who died from PCa and those who were censored. All previously reported findings of local recurrence, regional or distal lymph node metastases and bone metastases were counted and evaluated regarding 11C-acetate uptake intensity (SUVmax) and tumour volume. Total tumour volume and total lipogenic activity (TLA, summed SUVmax × TV) were calculated. Survival analysis in the entire study population was followed by Cox proportional hazards ratio (HR) analysis. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were included, and 22 PCa-specific deaths were recorded. The mean PSA level at the time of PET was 2.69 ± 4.35 ng/mL. The median follow-up of the study population was 79 ± 28 months. PET identified at least one PCa lesion in 53 % of patients. Five-year PCa-specific survival after PET was 80 % and 100 % in patients with a positive and a negative PET scan, respectively (p < 0.001). Time-to-death was linearly correlated with highest SUVmax (r = -0.55, p = 0.01) and nonlinearly with TLA (r = -0.75, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed statistical significance for number of bone metastases (HR 1.74, p = 0.01), tertile of TLA (HR 5.63, p = 0.029) and postoperative Gleason score (HR 1.84, p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Malignant 11C-acetate accumulation measured with PET/CT is a strong predictor of survival in the setting of PSA relapse after prostatectomy. The study provides further evidence for a quantitative relationship between malignant de novo lipogenesis and early death. 11C-Acetate PET/CT might be useful for identifying a high-risk population of relapsing patients in which therapies targeting malignant lipogenesis might be of particular benefit.
PURPOSE: Malignant de novo lipogenesis is strongly linked to the aggressiveness of prostate cancer (PCa) under experimental conditions. 11C-Acetate PET/CT is a potential noninvasive biomarker of malignant lipogenesis in PCa, but its prognostic value is not known. The objective of this study was to analyse 11C-acetate PET/CT image metrics in relation to survival. METHODS: All patients undergoing 11C-acetate PET/CT in one university hospital from 2005 to 2011 due to PSA relapse after previous prostatectomy were retrospectively evaluated. Two groups of patients were compared: those who died from PCa and those who were censored. All previously reported findings of local recurrence, regional or distal lymph node metastases and bone metastases were counted and evaluated regarding 11C-acetate uptake intensity (SUVmax) and tumour volume. Total tumour volume and total lipogenic activity (TLA, summed SUVmax × TV) were calculated. Survival analysis in the entire study population was followed by Cox proportional hazards ratio (HR) analysis. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were included, and 22 PCa-specific deaths were recorded. The mean PSA level at the time of PET was 2.69 ± 4.35 ng/mL. The median follow-up of the study population was 79 ± 28 months. PET identified at least one PCa lesion in 53 % of patients. Five-year PCa-specific survival after PET was 80 % and 100 % in patients with a positive and a negative PET scan, respectively (p < 0.001). Time-to-death was linearly correlated with highest SUVmax (r = -0.55, p = 0.01) and nonlinearly with TLA (r = -0.75, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed statistical significance for number of bone metastases (HR 1.74, p = 0.01), tertile of TLA (HR 5.63, p = 0.029) and postoperative Gleason score (HR 1.84, p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Malignant 11C-acetate accumulation measured with PET/CT is a strong predictor of survival in the setting of PSA relapse after prostatectomy. The study provides further evidence for a quantitative relationship between malignant de novo lipogenesis and early death. 11C-Acetate PET/CT might be useful for identifying a high-risk population of relapsing patients in which therapies targeting malignant lipogenesis might be of particular benefit.
Authors: Nobuyuki Oyama; Tom R Miller; Farrokh Dehdashti; Barry A Siegel; Keith C Fischer; Jeff M Michalski; Adam S Kibel; Gerald L Andriole; Joel Picus; Michael J Welch Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Mario Eisenberger; Frederick J Dorey; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-07-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Mario Eisenberger; Alan W Partin Journal: J Urol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Bruce J Trock; Misop Han; Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Theodore L DeWeese; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Asha Leisser; Konstatin Pruscha; Philipp Ubl; Wolfgang Wadsak; Marius Mayerhöfer; Markus Mitterhauser; Marcus Hacker; Gero Kramer; Shahrokh Shariat; Georgios Karanikas; Markus Hartenbach; Alexander R Haug Journal: Prostate Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: B J Krause; M Souvatzoglou; M Tuncel; K Herrmann; A K Buck; C Praus; T Schuster; H Geinitz; U Treiber; M Schwaiger Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-09-22 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Andrew J Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan; Thomas M Pisansky; Kevin M Slawin; Eric A Klein; Mitchell S Anscher; Jeff M Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Daniel W Lin; Jeffrey D Forman; Michael J Zelefsky; Larry L Kestin; Claus G Roehrborn; Charles N Catton; Theodore L DeWeese; Stanley L Liauw; Richard K Valicenti; Deborah A Kuban; Alan Pollack Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-05-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sanoj Punnen; Matthew R Cooperberg; Anthony V D'Amico; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Judd W Moul; Howard I Scher; Thorsten Schlomm; Stephen J Freedland Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Shuren Li; Markus Peck-Radosavljevic; Philipp Ubl; Wolfgang Wadsak; Markus Mitterhauser; Eva Rainer; Matthias Pinter; Hao Wang; Christian Nanoff; Klaus Kaczirek; Alexander Haug; Marcus Hacker Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-05-29 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Naresh Regula; Hadis Honarvar; Mark Lubberink; Håkan Jorulf; Sam Ladjevardi; Michael Häggman; Gunnar Antoni; Jos Buijs; Irina Velikyan; Jens Sörensen Journal: Int J Med Sci Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 3.738