| Literature DB >> 23936680 |
P Díaz-Rodríguez1, A Pérez-Estévez, R Seoane, P González, J Serra, M Landin.
Abstract
The present work is aimed at getting a new insight into biomorphic silicon carbides (bioSiCs) as bone replacement materials. BioSiCs from a variety of precursors were produced, characterized, and loaded with a broad-spectrum antibiotic. The capacity of loaded bioSiCs for preventing and/or treating preformed S. aureus biofilms has been studied. The differences in precursor characteristics are maintained after the ceramic production process. All bioSiCs allow the loading process by capillarity, giving loaded materials with drug release profiles dependent on their microstructure. The amount of antibiotic released in liquid medium during the first six hours depends on bioSiC porosity, but it could exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration of Staphylococcus aureus, for all the materials studied, thus preventing the proliferation of bacteria. Differences in the external surface and the number and size of open external pores of bioSiCs contribute towards the variations in the effect against bacteria when experiments are carried out using solid media. The internal structure and surface properties of all the systems seem to facilitate the therapeutic activity of the antibiotic on the preformed biofilms, reducing the number of viable bacteria present in the biofilm compared to controls.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23936680 PMCID: PMC3725843 DOI: 10.1155/2013/104529
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISRN Pharm ISSN: 2090-6145
Figure 1Transverse surface of different bioSiC pieces characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM): (a) pine bioSiC, (b) oak bioSiC, and (c) sapelli bioSiC.
Figure 2Pore size distribution obtained from mercury intrusion porosimetry of bioSiC of (a) pine, (b) oak, and (c) sapelli.
BioSiC properties obtained by helium pycnometry, nitrogen adsorption and mercury intrusion porosimetry. Standard deviation in parentheses.
| Sample | Density | HG | Specific surface (m2/g) | HG | Porosity (%) | HG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pine bioSiC | 3.01 (0.01) | X | 0.83 (0.05) | X | 46.97 (5.43) | X |
| Oak bioSiC | 2.90 (0.01) | X | 1.10 (0.02) | X | 27.85 (2.99) | X |
| Sapelli bioSiC | 3.05 (0.01) | X | 0.99 (0.05) | X | 40.72 (1.06) | X |
HG means homogeneous groups.
Figure 3Release profiles of the low load concentrations of vancomycin from three types of bioSiCs from different precursors in PBS. The dashed lines (-) indicate the doses of vancomycin and correspond to 100% drug released.
The release kinetics of vancomycin of loaded bioSiCs (Dose = 1.27 mg/mL) by Higuchi model (M = K ∗t 0.5). Standard deviation in parentheses.
| Sample |
|
|
| Freedom degrees |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oak bioSiC | 0.32 (0.07) | >0.90 | >70 | 1 and 7 | <0.01 |
| Pine bioSiC | 0.54 (0.15) | >0.94 | >90 | 1 and 7 | <0.01 |
| Sapelli bioSiC | 0.59 (0.06) | >0.86 | >36 | 1 and 7 | <0.01 |
K is the Higuchi release rate constant, r 2 is the square of the correlation coefficient, F is the F-ratio from the ANOVA of the regression and α is the probability of error.
Figure 4Inhibition halo profiles obtained from and Staphylococcus aureus culture for the treatment with different vancomycin doses 1.27 mg and 2.54 mg loaded bioSiCs.
Number of CFUs of S. aureus on the biofilm at preset times (dilution 104).
|
|
Differences in colour show statistically significant differences.
Figure 5SEM micrographs of (a) induced biofilm on cellulose nitrate membrane, (b) induced biofilm treated with unloaded oak bioSiC (control1) after 48 h incubation, and (c) induced biofilm treated with vancomycin loaded (2.54 mg) oak bioSiC after 48 h incubation.