| Literature DB >> 23936406 |
Camila Malta Romano1, Michael Lauck, Felipe S Salvador, Célia Rodrigues Lima, Lucy S Villas-Boas, Evaldo Stanislau A Araújo, José Eduardo Levi, Claudio Sergio Pannuti, David O'Connor, Esper Georges Kallas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High genetic diversity at both inter- and intra-host level are hallmarks of RNA viruses due to the error-prone nature of their genome replication. Several groups have evaluated the extent of viral variability using different RNA virus deep sequencing methods. Although much of this effort has been dedicated to pathogens that cause chronic infections in humans, few studies investigated arthropod-borne, acute viral infections. METHODS AND PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23936406 PMCID: PMC3732279 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070318
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Geographic region of 2010 Santos epidemic.
Southern São Paulo coastal region where viruses from this study were sampled are in red in the São Paulo map. Full black and red circles in the region focused represent the cities affected. The size of the circles specifies the magnitude of the epidemic in each city, also given by the number of reported cases in Santos (St), Praia Grande (PG), Guarujá (Gu), São Vicente (SV) and Cubatão (Cu).
Clinical and laboratorial information of DENV-2 samples.
| Patient | GenBank ID | Age(years) | Gender | Clinicalmanifestation | Primary XSecondary | Platelets/ml | Samplingday | VL | Samplingdate |
| ACS46 | JX286516 | 55 | Female | Classical | 2nd | 113000 | 1 | 2.8E6 | 03/01/2010 |
| ACS46sn | JX286517 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| ACS380 | JX286526 | 67 | Female | Classical | 2nd | 124000 | 2 | 6.6E6 | 03/30/2010 |
| ACS538 | JX286518 | 62 | Female | Severe | 2nd | 43000 | 3 | 9.2E6 | 04/10/2010 |
| ACS542 | JX286519 | 1 | Male | Severe | ND | 24000 | 3 | 4.5E6 | 04/12/2010 |
| ACS721 | JX286521 | 34 | Female | Classical | ND | 191000 | 4 | 1.18E7 | 05/04/2010 |
| DGV34 | JX286522 | 50 | Male | Classical | 2nd | 158000 | 3 | 1.4E7 | 02/24/2010 |
| DGV37 | JX286520 | 46 | Female | Classical | 2nd | 132000 | 2 | 8.9E5 | 02/24/2010 |
| DGV69 | JX286525 | 56 | Male | Classical | 2nd | 122000 | 2 | 2.07E7 | 03/09/2010 |
| DGV91 | JX286523 | 45 | Female | Classical | 2nd | 233000 | 3 | 1.2E6 | 03/24/2010 |
| DGV106 | JX286524 | 82 | Female | Classical | 2nd | 10000 | 4 | 4E5 | 04/15/2010 |
supernatant of sample ACS46 cultured viruses in C6/36 (1week).
Although the low platelets number, the patient had no additional evidence of severity.
Days after the onset.
VL- viral load in copy number/ml.
Nd- not done.
Figure 2Inter-host variability.
A- The line graph summarizes the level of accumulated variability per genome region across the Santos consensus viruses. B- Variability (synonymous changes) among consensus sequences sampled in Santos (light blue squares) compared to the variability among viruses from previous epidemics in 2008 in Ribeirão Preto, SP (green squares). Non-synonymous changes are represented in dark blue in both populations.
Figure 3Bayesian phylogenetic tree of 124 DENV2 complete genomes.
A-The tree shows the eleven Brazilian viruses sequenced in this study (two-color highlighted cluster at the top) and globally sampled DENV2 genomes. Blue branches represent Brazilian viruses sampled in previous epidemics. Posterior probability of all key nodes is depicted. B- Clusters of viruses sequenced during this study. The blue bar in the branch leading to clade 2 represents the amino acid change at position T180I in envelope gene.
Deep Sequence obtained results and Inter-host viral variability.
| Sample | Genome Sizesequenced | # sites excludingHPs | # Reads(x1000) | AverageCoverage/nt | # variable sites(SNP) | Variable sites/genome size (%) | Non-synonymousvariations (%) | # total of ntvariants | # of DIP | π |
| ACS46p | 10598 | 8420 | 24.7 | 717 | 10 | 0.11 | 3 (30%) | 257 | 7 | 4.2E-5 |
| ACS46sn | 10540 | 8362 | 27.5 | 818 | 14 | 0.16 | 5 (35%) | 423 | 8 | 6.2E-5 |
| ACS380* | 10630 | – | 1.434 | 11.100 | 44 | 0.4 | 26 (59%) | 12377 | 2 | 1.0E-4 |
| ACS538 | 10544 | 8366 | 59.2 | 1628 | 15 | 0.17 | 9 (60%) | 989 | 8 | 7.2E-5 |
| ACS542 | 10540 | 8362 | 33 | 970 | 13 | 0.15 | 4 (30%) | 413 | 3 | 4.0E-5 |
| ACS721 | 10597 | 8419 | 45.5 | 1250 | 10 | 0.18 | 7 (70%) | 42 | 4 | 4.0E-6 |
| DGV34 | 10600 | 8422 | 48.7 | 1210 | 32 | 0.38 | 15 (45%) | 353 | 0 | 3.5E-5 |
| DGV37 | 10600 | 8422 | 91.3 | 2576 | 10 | 0.18 | 2 (20%) | 373 | 2 | 1.7E-5 |
| DGV69 | 10600 | 8422 | 33 | 913 | 14 | 0.16 | 6 (42%) | 399 | 0 | 5.1E-5 |
| DGV91 | 10611 | 8433 | 96.2 | 2186 | 34 | 0.4 | 20 (58%) | 1068 | 0 | 5.8E-5 |
| DGV106 | 10574 | 8396 | 109.7 | 2770 | 12 | 0.14 | 5 (42%) | 1288 | 0 | 5.5E-5 |
All estimates were done after excluding homopolymer sites (HPs) from virus sequenced in 454.
The % Variable sites/genome size was calculated by dividing the number of variable sites (SNP) per # sites excluding HPs. The “# total of nt variants” does consider the total amount of nucleotides (reads) that vary in such position. This number was used to calculate the overall genetic variability.