Literature DB >> 31673739

A low-volume surgeon is an independent risk factor for leg length discrepancy after primary total hip arthroplasty: a case-control study.

Yuji Kishimoto1,2, Hiroko Suda3, Takahiro Kishi3, Toshiaki Takahashi3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is one of the bothersome complications that reduce patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to investigate the independent risk factors of LLD after primary THA.
METHODS: This is a case-control study of 163 THAs for 163 patients at our institution between April 2015 and March 2018. The relevant data about the general characteristics of the patients (age, sex, body mass index, and diagnosis), surgery (surgical approach, type of femoral stem fixation, and surgeon volume), and radiological findings (Dorr classification and pre-operative LLD) were reviewed to identify the risk factors of ≥ 5 mm post-operative LLD according to radiological measurement and to calculate odds ratios (OR) via logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: The median (interquartile) absolute value of post-operative LLD was 3.9 (2.3-7.4) mm, and 57 (35.0%) patients had LLD of ≥ 5 mm. After controlling for possible confounders, a low-volume surgeon was considered the only independent risk factor of post-operative LLD (adjusted OR: 8.26; 95% confidence interval: 3.48, 19.60; P < 0.001). Among the 103 patients performed by high-volume surgeons, 82 (79.6%) had LLD of < 5 mm, whereas among the 60 patients performed by low-volume surgeons, only 24 (40.0%) achieved LLD of < 5 mm (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: A low-volume surgeon is associated with an increased risk of a post-operative LLD after primary THA, and the importance of measurements should be recognized to prevent post-operative LLD and achieve optimal outcomes. Moreover, surgeons must inform patients about the risk of developing LLD pre-operatively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Leg length discrepancy; Primary total hip arthroplasty; Surgeon volume

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31673739     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-019-04435-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  33 in total

1.  Association between hospital procedure volume and risk of revision after total hip arthroplasty: a population-based study within the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database.

Authors:  E N Glassou; T B Hansen; K Mäkelä; L I Havelin; O Furnes; M Badawy; J Kärrholm; G Garellick; A Eskelinen; A B Pedersen
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression.

Authors:  Eric Vittinghoff; Charles E McCulloch
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Relationship between peri-operative outcomes and hospital surgical volume of total hip arthroplasty in Japan.

Authors:  Takeshi Kaneko; Kazuo Hirakawa; Kiyohide Fushimi
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty: Can leg length be satisfactorily controlled via anterior approach without a traction table? Evaluation in 56 patients with EOS 3D.

Authors:  Paul Lecoanet; Morgane Vargas; Julien Pallaro; Thomas Thelen; Clément Ribes; Thierry Fabre
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.256

5.  Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur.

Authors:  L D Dorr; M C Faugere; A M Mackel; T A Gruen; B Bognar; H H Malluche
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Claims in total hip arthroplasty: analysis of the instigating factors, costs and possible solution.

Authors:  M Novi; C Vanni; P D Parchi; M Di Paolo; N Piolanti; M Scaglione
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-02-13

7.  Transitioning to the direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Is it a true muscle sparing approach when performed by a low volume hip replacement surgeon?

Authors:  Dan-Viorel Nistor; Sergiu Caterev; Sorana-Daniela Bolboacă; Dan Cosma; Dan Osvald Gheorghe Lucaciu; Adrian Todor
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Leg length discrepancy in computer navigated total hip arthroplasty - how accurate are we?

Authors:  Pregash Ellapparadja; Vivek Mahajan; Sami Atiya; Biju Sankar; Kamal Deep
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 2.135

9.  Accuracy of acetabular component position in hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert L Barrack; Jeffrey A Krempec; John C Clohisy; Douglas J McDonald; William M Ricci; Erin L Ruh; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The learning curve in short-stem THA: influence of the surgeon's experience on intraoperative adjustments due to intraoperative radiography.

Authors:  Lennard Loweg; Karl Philipp Kutzner; Matthias Trost; Marlene Hechtner; Philipp Drees; Joachim Pfeil; Michael Schneider
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-10-13
View more
  1 in total

1.  The morphology of the proximal femur in cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty: No negative effect on offset reconstruction, leg length difference and implant positioning.

Authors:  Matthias Luger; Sandra Feldler; Antonio Klasan; Tobias Gotterbarm; Clemens Schopper
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.359

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.