Literature DB >> 23934386

Factors associated with methotrexate dosing and therapeutic decisions in veterans with rheumatoid arthritis.

Bernard Ng1, Adeline Chu.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore patient factors associated with differences in methotrexate (MTX) dosing and to compare patient factors and MTX-dosing patterns between those who remained on MTX monotherapy and those who were switched or had additional therapy. A retrospective cohort of 7,017 patients with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was identified in the United States Department of Veterans Affairs administrative databases between 1 October 1999 and 30 September 2009. Regression analyses were used to study the association of MTX start and maximum dose attained with various patient characteristics and compare differences between groups who had therapeutic change (having switched to or added another anti-rheumatic agent or having steroids increased by 2.5 mg of prednisone or equivalent) with those remaining on MTX monotherapy. Abnormal serum creatinine (>1.5 mg/dL) was associated lower start and peak MTX doses (p < 0.01). Older RA patients were less likely to attain peak MTX dose of 15 mg or more (p < 0.01). Males and patients 75 and older (compared with <45) had lower risk of therapeutic change (hazard ratio, [HR] 0.80, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.90, and HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.42-0.36-0.50, respectively). Patients who attained higher peak MTX dose had lower risk of therapeutic change compared with those dosed at less than 15 mg/week (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.92 for 15 to <20 and HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.72-0.86 for 20 or more). Injectable MTX use conferred lower risk of therapeutic change (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.52-0.78). Two thirds did not attain a maximum MTX dose of 20 mg/week or more before therapeutic change occurred. Older age and renal insufficiency were barriers to the use of higher MTX maximum dosages. Use of injectable MTX and higher maximum MTX dose were independently associated with higher likelihood to remain on MTX monotherapy. Further studies are needed to explore targeted interventions that may optimize MTX dosing to improve success rates of MTX monotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23934386     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-013-2353-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  29 in total

1.  The rheumatoid arthritis patient in the clinic: comparing more than 1,300 consecutive DMARD courses.

Authors:  D Aletaha; J S Smolen
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.580

2.  Factors that influence rheumatologists' decisions to escalate care in rheumatoid arthritis: results from a choice-based conjoint analysis.

Authors:  Wietske Kievit; Laura van Hulst; Piet van Riel; Liana Fraenkel
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 3.  Avoiding common pitfalls in the analysis of observational studies of new treatments for rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Marie Hudson; Samy Suissa
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.794

4.  Gaps in care for rheumatoid arthritis: a population study.

Authors:  Diane Lacaille; Aslam H Anis; Daphne P Guh; John M Esdaile
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2005-04-15

5.  Receipt of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs among patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Medicare managed care plans.

Authors:  Gabriela Schmajuk; Amal N Trivedi; Daniel H Solomon; Edward Yelin; Laura Trupin; Eliza F Chakravarty; Jinoos Yazdany
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

7.  Does the age of onset of rheumatoid arthritis influence phenotype?: a prospective study of outcome and prognostic factors.

Authors:  C T Pease; B B Bhakta; J Devlin; P Emery
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.580

8.  Use of short-term efficacy/toxicity tradeoffs to select second-line drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. A metaanalysis of published clinical trials.

Authors:  D T Felson; J J Anderson; R F Meenan
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1992-10

9.  Effect of a treatment strategy of tight control for rheumatoid arthritis (the TICORA study): a single-blind randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Catriona Grigor; Hilary Capell; Anne Stirling; Alex D McMahon; Peter Lock; Ramsay Vallance; Wilma Kincaid; Duncan Porter
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Jul 17-23       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Optimal dosage and route of administration of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  K Visser; D van der Heijde
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 19.103

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes related to methotrexate dose and route of administration in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Susan M Goodman; Bruce N Cronstein; Vivian P Bykerk
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 4.473

2.  Biologic and Glucocorticoid Use after Methotrexate Initiation in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Michael D George; Brian C Sauer; Chia-Chen Teng; Grant W Cannon; Bryant R England; Gail S Kerr; Ted R Mikuls; Joshua F Baker
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.666

3.  Effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and renal insufficiency: a real-life registry study in Japan (the ACTRA-RI study).

Authors:  Shunsuke Mori; Tamami Yoshitama; Toshihiko Hidaka; Naoyuki Hirakata; Yukitaka Ueki
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 19.103

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.