Literature DB >> 12468815

The rheumatoid arthritis patient in the clinic: comparing more than 1,300 consecutive DMARD courses.

D Aletaha1, J S Smolen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is typically characterized by the sequential use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). This study aimed to reveal treatment patterns with traditional DMARDs and their changes during the two decades before the recent introduction of new DMARDs.
METHODS: A total of 593 RA patients were followed from their first presentation to our clinic throughout the course of their disease; 222 patients received their first DMARD therapy while under our care. More than 2,300 patient years of therapy were analysed for the efficacy [using C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) as surrogates] and duration of drug therapy of consecutive DMARDs.
RESULTS: Before 1985, 65-90% of initial DMARDs were gold compounds, but their use decreased continuously thereafter. Antimalarial (AM) drugs were important initial DMARDs in new patients at all times, whereas sulphasalazine (SSZ) and methotrexate (MTX) gained increasing significance after 1985 (the first DMARD was MTX in up to 29% of new patients). Penicillamine (DPA), azathioprine (AZP), cyclosporin (CyA) and combination therapies were not usually employed initially, but were reserved for the later course of the disease. Gender, age and rheumatoid factor were not different between patients receiving different DMARDs. The baseline acute-phase response was higher in patients treated with MTX (mean CRP 3.5 mg/dl) than in those treated with SSZ (CRP 2.4 mg/dl; P < 0.05) or AM (CRP 2.1 mg/dl; P < 0.05), suggesting that MTX was used preferentially in patients with high disease activity. On the other hand, once AM or SSZ had been discontinued, MTX was the most common subsequent DMARD (in 31 and 56% respectively). Comparison of first DMARDs with subsequent ones revealed that first DMARDs were more effective: the acute-phase response decreased most prominently during first therapies (CRP reduction was 1.28 mg/dl during first courses and 0.35 mg/dl during fourth or later courses; P < 0.01); and retention rates were significantly longer for first compared with subsequent therapies (median of 24.5 months for first and 18.6 months for fourth or subsequent therapies; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: MTX was the most commonly employed DMARD therapy for RA and was used increasingly as first therapy in newly diagnosed RA. Patients with high disease activity were given MTX therapy more often than other DMARDs, while those with low activity were more likely to receive SSZ or AM, and MTX on failure of these drugs. First DMARDs in new patients were retained longer than subsequent DMARDs, apparently because they are more effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12468815     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/41.12.1367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  58 in total

Review 1.  Threats to validity of observational studies on disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapies for rheumatoid arthritis: new aspects after the fall of the pyramid and the rise of new therapeutics.

Authors:  Daniel Aletaha; Josef S Smolen
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  Appropriate and effective management of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  F C Breedveld; J R Kalden
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Characteristics of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in France: a study of 1109 patients managed by hospital based rheumatologists.

Authors:  J Sany; P Bourgeois; A Saraux; S Durieux; A Lafuma; J P Daurès; F Guillemin; J Sibilia
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Changes in cotherapies after initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Vivian K Kawai; Carlos G Grijalva; Patrick G Arbogast; Jeffrey R Curtis; Daniel H Solomon; Elizabeth Delzell; Lang Chen; Rita Ouellet-Hellstrom; Lisa Herrinton; Liyan Liu; Edward F Mitchel; C Michael Stein; Marie R Griffin
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Modelling cost effectiveness and cost utility of sequential DMARD therapy including leflunomide for rheumatoid arthritis in Germany: II. The contribution of leflunomide to efficiency.

Authors:  Peter K Schädlich; Henning Zeidler; Angela Zink; Erika Gromnica-Ihle; Matthias Schneider; Christoph Straub; Josef G Brecht; Eduard Huppertz
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  The gap between practice and guidelines in the choice of first-line disease modifying antirheumatic drug in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort.

Authors:  Mathilde Benhamou; Nathalie Rincheval; Carine Roy; Violaine Foltz; Sylvie Rozenberg; Jean Sibilia; Thierry Schaeverbeke; Pierre Bourgeois; Philippe Ravaud; Bruno Fautrel
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of tocilizumab, sarilumab, and sirukumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Sang-Cheol Bae; Young Ho Lee
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Survival and effectiveness of leflunomide compared with methotrexate and sulfasalazine in rheumatoid arthritis: a matched observational study.

Authors:  D Aletaha; T Stamm; T Kapral; G Eberl; J Grisar; K P Machold; J S Smolen
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a global perspective on the use of antirheumatic drugs.

Authors:  Tuulikki Sokka; Minja Envalds; Theodore Pincus
Journal:  Mod Rheumatol       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 3.023

Review 10.  Optimal dosage and route of administration of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  K Visser; D van der Heijde
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.