Literature DB >> 21285425

Receipt of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs among patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Medicare managed care plans.

Gabriela Schmajuk1, Amal N Trivedi, Daniel H Solomon, Edward Yelin, Laura Trupin, Eliza F Chakravarty, Jinoos Yazdany.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: In 2005, the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) introduced a quality measure to assess the receipt of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
OBJECTIVE: To identify sociodemographic, community, and health plan factors associated with DMARD receipt among Medicare managed care enrollees. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed individual-level HEDIS data for 93,143 patients who were at least 65 years old with at least 2 diagnoses of RA within a measurement year (during 2005-2008). Logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to determine factors associated with DMARD receipt and logistic regression was used to adjust health plan performance for case mix. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Receipt or nonreceipt of DMARD.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 74 years; 75% were women and 82% were white. Overall performance on the HEDIS measure for RA was 59% in 2005, increasing to 67% in 2008 (P for trend <.001). The largest difference in performance was based on age: patients aged 85 years and older had a 30 percentage point lower rate of DMARD receipt (95% confidence interval [CI], -29 to -32 points; P < .001), compared with patients 65 to 69 years of age, even after adjusting for other factors. Lower percentage point rates were also found for patients who were men (-3 points; 95% CI, -5 to -2 points; P < .001), of black race (-4 points; 95% CI, -6 to -2 points; P < .001), with low personal income (-6 points; 95% CI, -8 to -5 points; P < .001), with the lowest zip code-based socioeconomic status (-4 points; 95% CI, -6 to 2 points; P < .001), or enrolled in for-profit health plans (-4 points; 95% CI, -7 to 0 points; P < .001); and in the Middle Atlantic region (-7 points; 95% CI, -13 to -2 points; P < .001) and South Atlantic regions (-11 points; 95% CI, -20 to -3 points; P < .001) as compared with the Pacific region. Performance varied widely by health plan, ranging from 16% to 87%.
CONCLUSIONS: Among Medicare managed care enrollees carrying a diagnosis of RA between 2005 and 2008, 63% received a DMARD. Receipt of DMARDs varied based on demographic factors, socioeconomic status, geographic location, and health plan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21285425      PMCID: PMC3172813          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  34 in total

Review 1.  Progress in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  D S Pisetsky; E W St Clair
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-12-12       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: 2002 Update.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-02

3.  Quality care in seniors with new-onset rheumatoid arthritis: a Canadian perspective.

Authors:  Jessica Widdifield; Sasha Bernatsky; J Michael Paterson; J Carter Thorne; Alfred Cividino; Janet Pope; Nadia Gunraj; Claire Bombardier
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.794

4.  Secondary data bases and their use in outcomes research: a review of the area resource file and the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project.

Authors:  A E Best
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Gaps in care for rheumatoid arthritis: a population study.

Authors:  Diane Lacaille; Aslam H Anis; Daphne P Guh; John M Esdaile
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2005-04-15

6.  Trends in the quality of care and racial disparities in Medicare managed care.

Authors:  Amal N Trivedi; Alan M Zaslavsky; Eric C Schneider; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Combination therapy with multiple disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a preventive strategy.

Authors:  T Pincus; J R O'Dell; J M Kremer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-11-16       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  The sensitivity and specificity of computerized databases for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  S E Gabriel
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1994-06

9.  How patients' sociodemographic characteristics affect comparisons of competing health plans in California on HEDIS quality measures.

Authors:  Alan M Zaslavsky; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.038

10.  HCFA's racial and ethnic data: current accuracy and recent improvements.

Authors:  S L Arday; D R Arday; S Monroe; J Zhang
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2000
View more
  69 in total

Review 1.  Racial and ethnic disparities in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Christine A McBurney; Ernest R Vina
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  A Multistakeholder Approach to Improving Quality in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Proceedings from the Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality Expert Medical Panel.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; C Kent Kwoh; Albert J Rizzoli; John A Welz
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2014-11

Review 3.  Epidemiology research in rheumatology-progress and pitfalls.

Authors:  Deborah P M Symmons
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  Coverage for high-cost specialty drugs for rheumatoid arthritis in Medicare Part D.

Authors:  Jinoos Yazdany; R Adams Dudley; Randi Chen; Grace A Lin; Chien-Wen Tseng
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 10.995

5.  Use of disease-modifying medications for rheumatoid arthritis by race and ethnicity in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

Authors:  Daniel H Solomon; John Z Ayanian; Ed Yelin; Tamara Shaykevich; M Alan Brookhart; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.794

6.  Quality of care for incident lupus nephritis among Medicaid beneficiaries in the United States.

Authors:  Jinoos Yazdany; Candace H Feldman; Jun Liu; Michael M Ward; Michael A Fischer; Karen H Costenbader
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 7.  Review: treat to target in rheumatoid arthritis: fact, fiction, or hypothesis?

Authors:  Daniel H Solomon; Asaf Bitton; Jeffrey N Katz; Helga Radner; Erika M Brown; Liana Fraenkel
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 10.995

Review 8.  Janus kinases to jakinibs: from basic insights to clinical practice.

Authors:  Massimo Gadina; Mimi T Le; Daniella M Schwartz; Olli Silvennoinen; Shingo Nakayamada; Kunihiro Yamaoka; John J O'Shea
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 7.580

9.  Development of the American College of Rheumatology's Rheumatoid Arthritis Electronic Clinical Quality Measures.

Authors:  Jinoos Yazdany; Mark Robbins; Gabriela Schmajuk; Sonali Desai; Diane Lacaille; Tuhina Neogi; Jasvinder A Singh; Mark Genovese; Rachel Myslinski; Natalie Fisk; Melissa Francisco; Eric Newman
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 10.  A new era of quality measurement in rheumatology: electronic clinical quality measures and national registries.

Authors:  Chris Tonner; Gabriela Schmajuk; Jinoos Yazdany
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.