BACKGROUND: We assessed the acute impact of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GBP) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) compared to caloric-matched control group without surgery on glucose excursion in obese patients with type 2 diabetes, and examined if this was mediated by changes in insulin resistance, early insulin response or glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 levels. METHODS: Six-day subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) recordings were obtained from patients beginning 3 days before GBP (n = 11), SG (n = 10) or fasting in control group (n = 10). GLP-1, insulin and glucose were measured during 75 g oral glucose tolerance testing at the start and end of each CGM. RESULTS: Post-operative hyperglycaemia occurred after both surgeries in the first 6 h, with a more rapid decline in glycaemia after GBP (p < 0.001). Beyond 24 h post-operatively, continuous overlapping of net glycaemia action reduced from baseline after GBP (median [interquartile range]) 1.6 [1.2-2.4] to 1.0 [0.7-1.3] and after SG 1.4 [0.9-1.8] to 0.7 [0.7-1.0]; p < 0.05), similar to controls (2.2 [1.7-2.5] to 1.3 [0.8-2.8] p < 0.05). Higher log GLP-1 increment post-oral glucose occurred after GBP (mean ± SE, 0.80 ± 0.12 vs. 0.37 ± 0.09, p < 0.05), but not after SG or control intervention. Among subgroup with baseline hyperglycaemia, a reduction in HOMA-IR followed GBP. Reduction in time and level of peak glucose and 2-h glucose occurred after both surgeries but not in controls. CONCLUSIONS: GBP and SG have a similar acute impact on reducing glycaemia to caloric restriction; however, with a superior impact on glucose tolerance.
BACKGROUND: We assessed the acute impact of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GBP) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) compared to caloric-matched control group without surgery on glucose excursion in obesepatients with type 2 diabetes, and examined if this was mediated by changes in insulin resistance, early insulin response or glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 levels. METHODS: Six-day subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) recordings were obtained from patients beginning 3 days before GBP (n = 11), SG (n = 10) or fasting in control group (n = 10). GLP-1, insulin and glucose were measured during 75 g oral glucose tolerance testing at the start and end of each CGM. RESULTS: Post-operative hyperglycaemia occurred after both surgeries in the first 6 h, with a more rapid decline in glycaemia after GBP (p < 0.001). Beyond 24 h post-operatively, continuous overlapping of net glycaemia action reduced from baseline after GBP (median [interquartile range]) 1.6 [1.2-2.4] to 1.0 [0.7-1.3] and after SG 1.4 [0.9-1.8] to 0.7 [0.7-1.0]; p < 0.05), similar to controls (2.2 [1.7-2.5] to 1.3 [0.8-2.8] p < 0.05). Higher log GLP-1 increment post-oral glucose occurred after GBP (mean ± SE, 0.80 ± 0.12 vs. 0.37 ± 0.09, p < 0.05), but not after SG or control intervention. Among subgroup with baseline hyperglycaemia, a reduction in HOMA-IR followed GBP. Reduction in time and level of peak glucose and 2-h glucose occurred after both surgeries but not in controls. CONCLUSIONS: GBP and SG have a similar acute impact on reducing glycaemia to caloric restriction; however, with a superior impact on glucose tolerance.
Authors: Francesco Rubino; Antonello Forgione; David E Cummings; Michel Vix; Donatella Gnuli; Geltrude Mingrone; Marco Castagneto; Jacques Marescaux Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: S R Kashyap; S Daud; K R Kelly; A Gastaldelli; H Win; S Brethauer; J P Kirwan; P R Schauer Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2009-12-22 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: James M Isbell; Robyn A Tamboli; Erik N Hansen; Jabbar Saliba; Julia P Dunn; Sharon E Phillips; Pamela A Marks-Shulman; Naji N Abumrad Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-04-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Felicity Thomas; Greg C Smith; Jun Lu; Richard Babor; Michael Booth; Grant Beban; J Geoffrey Chase; Rinki Murphy Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Mia Jüllig; Shelley Yip; Aimin Xu; Greg Smith; Martin Middleditch; Michael Booth; Richard Babor; Grant Beban; Rinki Murphy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-06 Impact factor: 3.240