Literature DB >> 30135228

Comparison of the Vitek MS and Bruker Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry Systems for Identification of Chryseobacterium Isolates from Clinical Specimens and Report of Uncommon Chryseobacterium Infections in Humans.

Jiun-Nong Lin1,2,3, Shih-Hua Teng4, Chung-Hsu Lai5,3, Chih-Hui Yang6, Yi-Han Huang5, Hsiu-Fang Lin7, Hsi-Hsun Lin8,9.   

Abstract

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry is becoming more popular and is replacing traditional identification methods in the clinical microbiology laboratory. We aimed to compare the Vitek mass spectrometry (MS) and Bruker Biotyper systems for the identification of Chryseobacterium isolated from clinical specimens and to report uncommon Chryseobacterium infections in humans. The microbial database from a hospital was searched for records between 2005 and 2016 to identify cultures that yielded Chryseobacterium Species identification by the Vitek MS and Bruker Biotyper systems was compared to identification by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Over the study period, 140 Chryseobacterium isolates were included. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing, 78 isolates were C. indologenes, 39 were C. gleum, 12 were uncommon Chryseobacterium species (C. arthrosphaerae, C. culicis, C. cucumeris, C. bernardetii, C. artocarpi, and C. daecheongense), and the remaining 11 isolates were only identified at the genus level. The Vitek MS and Bruker Biotyper systems correctly identified 98.7% and 100% of C. indologenes isolates, respectively. While the Bruker Biotyper accurately identified 100% of C. gleum isolates, the Vitek MS system correctly identified only 2.6% of isolates from this species. None of the uncommon Chryseobacterium species were successfully identified by either of these two systems. The overall accuracies of Chryseobacterium identification at the species level by the Vitek MS and Bruker Biotyper systems were 60.5% and 90.7%, respectively. An upgrade and correction of the Vitek MS and Bruker Biotyper databases is recommended to correctly identify Chryseobacterium species.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bruker Biotyper; Chryseobacterium; MALDI-TOF MS; Vitek MS; microbial identification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30135228      PMCID: PMC6204688          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00712-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  18 in total

1.  Ribosomal DNA sequencing for identification of aerobic gram-positive rods in the clinical laboratory (an 18-month evaluation).

Authors:  P P Bosshard; S Abels; R Zbinden; E C Böttger; M Altwegg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification in the diagnostic laboratory: pluses, perils, and pitfalls.

Authors:  J Michael Janda; Sharon L Abbott
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Use of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in the battle against bacterial infectious diseases: recent achievements and future perspectives.

Authors:  Vassilios Sandalakis; Ioannis Goniotakis; Iosif Vranakis; Dimosthenis Chochlakis; Anna Psaroulaki
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 3.940

4.  Chryseobacterium daecheongense sp. nov., isolated from freshwater lake sediment.

Authors:  Kwang Kyu Kim; Hee-Sung Bae; Peter Schumann; Sung-Taik Lee
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Identification, characterization, and biofilm formation of clinical Chryseobacterium gleum isolates.

Authors:  Hsueh-Hsia Lo; Shan-Min Chang
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.803

6.  Chryseobacterium cucumeris sp. nov., an endophyte isolated from cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) root, and emended description of Chryseobacterium arthrosphaerae.

Authors:  Jin-Ju Jeong; Dong Wan Lee; Byeonghyeok Park; Mee Kyung Sang; In-Geol Choi; Ki Deok Kim
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  Chryseobacterium culicis sp. nov., isolated from the midgut of the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus.

Authors:  Peter Kämpfer; Kshitij Chandel; G B K S Prasad; Y S Shouche; Vijay Veer
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Challenges in the identification of Chryseobacterium indologenes and Elizabethkingia meningoseptica in cases of nosocomial infections and patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  É B de Carvalho Filho; F A L Marson; C E Levy
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2017-09-13

9.  Dental plaque bacteria with reduced susceptibility to chlorhexidine are multidrug resistant.

Authors:  Hafiz Ghulam Murtaza Saleem; Christine Ann Seers; Anjum Nasim Sabri; Eric Charles Reynolds
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Comparison of four automated microbiology systems with 16S rRNA gene sequencing for identification of Chryseobacterium and Elizabethkingia species.

Authors:  Jiun-Nong Lin; Chung-Hsu Lai; Chih-Hui Yang; Yi-Han Huang; Hsiu-Fang Lin; Hsi-Hsun Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  5 in total

1.  Differences in Clinical Manifestations, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns, and Mutations of Fluoroquinolone Target Genes between Chryseobacterium gleum and Chryseobacterium indologenes.

Authors:  Jiun-Nong Lin; Chung-Hsu Lai; Chih-Hui Yang; Yi-Han Huang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Identification and Biosynthesis of Pro-Inflammatory Sulfonolipids from an Opportunistic Pathogen Chryseobacterium gleum.

Authors:  Lukuan Hou; Hai-Yan Tian; Li Wang; Zachary E Ferris; Junfeng Wang; Mingwei Cai; Ethan A Older; Manikanda Raja Keerthi Raja; Dan Xue; Wanyang Sun; Prakash Nagarkatti; Mitzi Nagarkatti; Hexin Chen; Daping Fan; Xiaoyu Tang; Jie Li
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Genomic Features, Comparative Genomic Analysis, and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Chryseobacterium arthrosphaerae Strain ED882-96 Isolated in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chih-Yu Liang; Chih-Hui Yang; Chung-Hsu Lai; Yi-Han Huang; Jiun-Nong Lin
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 4.  Current Status of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in Clinical Diagnostic Microbiology.

Authors:  Sachio Tsuchida; Hiroshi Umemura; Tomohiro Nakayama
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Chryseobacterium arthrosphaerae ventriculitis: A case report.

Authors:  Jae Hyoung Im; Donghwi Kim; Jin Ju Kim; Eun Young Kim; Young Kyoung Park; Hea Yoon Kwon; Moon-Hyun Chung; Ji Hyeon Baek; Jin-Soo Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.