OBJECTIVE: To evaluate normal breast tissue stiffness with virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ) using prospectively collected data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: B-mode ultrasound and VTIQ were performed in 132 breasts in 97 women. Mean values of VTIQ for parenchyma and fatty tissue were compared between those measured in healthy breasts and in the surrounding of histologically proven benign and malignant breast lesions. Moreover we reviewed VTIQ values according to breast density measured by the American College of Radiology (ACR) categories. In addition we analyzed re-test reliability of VTIQ. RESULTS: In 132 breasts the mean VTIQ values in parenchyma were significantly higher than in fatty tissue (3.23 m/s ± 0.74 versus 2.5 m/s ± 0.61; p<0.0001). In healthy breasts as well as in the surrounding of a benign or malignant lesions the VTIQ values of parenchyma were similar (p=0.12). In fatty tissue, small differences between mean VTIQ values of 2.25 m/s ± 0.51, 2.52 m/s ± 0.48 and 2.65 m/s ± 0.71 (p=0.01) in the respective groups were observed. The comparison of mean VTIQ values of parenchyma and fatty tissue in more and less dense breasts (ACR 1+2 versus ACR 3+4 breasts) also yielded no statistically significant difference. The re-test reliability of VTIQ assessed with three independent measurements was moderate (interclass-correlation of 0.52 (p<0.0001)). CONCLUSION: VTIQ is a reliable method for measuring the stiffness of breast tissue. We propose standard values for healthy parenchyma and fatty tissues independent of the surrounding tissue or the ACR category.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate normal breast tissue stiffness with virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ) using prospectively collected data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: B-mode ultrasound and VTIQ were performed in 132 breasts in 97 women. Mean values of VTIQ for parenchyma and fatty tissue were compared between those measured in healthy breasts and in the surrounding of histologically proven benign and malignant breast lesions. Moreover we reviewed VTIQ values according to breast density measured by the American College of Radiology (ACR) categories. In addition we analyzed re-test reliability of VTIQ. RESULTS: In 132 breasts the mean VTIQ values in parenchyma were significantly higher than in fatty tissue (3.23 m/s ± 0.74 versus 2.5 m/s ± 0.61; p<0.0001). In healthy breasts as well as in the surrounding of a benign or malignant lesions the VTIQ values of parenchyma were similar (p=0.12). In fatty tissue, small differences between mean VTIQ values of 2.25 m/s ± 0.51, 2.52 m/s ± 0.48 and 2.65 m/s ± 0.71 (p=0.01) in the respective groups were observed. The comparison of mean VTIQ values of parenchyma and fatty tissue in more and less dense breasts (ACR 1+2 versus ACR 3+4 breasts) also yielded no statistically significant difference. The re-test reliability of VTIQ assessed with three independent measurements was moderate (interclass-correlation of 0.52 (p<0.0001)). CONCLUSION: VTIQ is a reliable method for measuring the stiffness of breast tissue. We propose standard values for healthy parenchyma and fatty tissues independent of the surrounding tissue or the ACR category.
Authors: Xiao W Bo; Xiao L Li; Hui X Xu; Le H Guo; Dan D Li; Bo J Liu; Dan Wang; Ya P He; Xiao H Xu Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Andrea B Rosskopf; Elias Bachmann; Jess G Snedeker; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Florian M Buck Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Bhavika K Patel; Kay Pepin; Kathy R Brandt; Gina L Mazza; Barbara A Pockaj; Jun Chen; Yuxiang Zhou; Donald W Northfelt; Karen Anderson; Juliana M Kling; Celine M Vachon; Kristin R Swanson; Mehdi Nikkhah; Richard Ehman Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2022-04-30 Impact factor: 4.624
Authors: Sabrina Galgenmueller; Heike Jaeger; Wolfgang Kratzer; Stefan A Schmidt; Suemeyra Oeztuerk; Mark M Haenle; Richard A Mason; Tilmann Graeter Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-07-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Ana M Reyes-Ramos; Yasmín R Álvarez-García; Natalia Solodin; Jorge Almodovar; Elaine T Alarid; Wandaliz Torres-Garcia; Maribella Domenech Journal: ACS Biomater Sci Eng Date: 2021-03-10
Authors: Michael Golatta; Mirjam Schweitzer-Martin; Aba Harcos; Sarah Schott; Christina Gomez; Anne Stieber; Geraldine Rauch; Christoph Domschke; Joachim Rom; Florian Schütz; Christof Sohn; Jörg Heil Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 3.411