Literature DB >> 23932637

Normal breast tissue stiffness measured by a new ultrasound technique: virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ).

Michael Golatta1, Mirjam Schweitzer-Martin, Aba Harcos, Sarah Schott, Hans Junkermann, Geraldine Rauch, Christof Sohn, Jörg Heil.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate normal breast tissue stiffness with virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ) using prospectively collected data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: B-mode ultrasound and VTIQ were performed in 132 breasts in 97 women. Mean values of VTIQ for parenchyma and fatty tissue were compared between those measured in healthy breasts and in the surrounding of histologically proven benign and malignant breast lesions. Moreover we reviewed VTIQ values according to breast density measured by the American College of Radiology (ACR) categories. In addition we analyzed re-test reliability of VTIQ.
RESULTS: In 132 breasts the mean VTIQ values in parenchyma were significantly higher than in fatty tissue (3.23 m/s ± 0.74 versus 2.5 m/s ± 0.61; p<0.0001). In healthy breasts as well as in the surrounding of a benign or malignant lesions the VTIQ values of parenchyma were similar (p=0.12). In fatty tissue, small differences between mean VTIQ values of 2.25 m/s ± 0.51, 2.52 m/s ± 0.48 and 2.65 m/s ± 0.71 (p=0.01) in the respective groups were observed. The comparison of mean VTIQ values of parenchyma and fatty tissue in more and less dense breasts (ACR 1+2 versus ACR 3+4 breasts) also yielded no statistically significant difference. The re-test reliability of VTIQ assessed with three independent measurements was moderate (interclass-correlation of 0.52 (p<0.0001)).
CONCLUSION: VTIQ is a reliable method for measuring the stiffness of breast tissue. We propose standard values for healthy parenchyma and fatty tissues independent of the surrounding tissue or the ACR category.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast ultrasound; Shear wave elastography; Standard value; Virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ)

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23932637     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.06.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  15 in total

1.  A novel two-dimensional quantitative shear wave elastography for differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions.

Authors:  Li Tang; Hui-Xiong Xu; Xiao-Wan Bo; Bo-Ji Liu; Xiao-Long Li; Rong Wu; Dan-Dan Li; Lin Fang; Xiao-Hong Xu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

2.  Combination of two-dimensional shear wave elastography with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system in the diagnosis of breast lesions: a new method to increase the diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Dan-Dan Li; Hui-Xiong Xu; Le-Hang Guo; Xiao-Wan Bo; Xiao-Long Li; Rong Wu; Jun-Mei Xu; Yi-Feng Zhang; Kun Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Elastography for the pancreas: Current status and future perspective.

Authors:  Natsuko Kawada; Sachiko Tanaka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  2D shear-wave ultrasound elastography (SWE) evaluation of ablation zone following radiofrequency ablation of liver lesions: is it more accurate?

Authors:  Xiao W Bo; Xiao L Li; Hui X Xu; Le H Guo; Dan D Li; Bo J Liu; Dan Wang; Ya P He; Xiao H Xu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Comparison of shear wave velocity measurements assessed with two different ultrasound systems in an ex-vivo tendon strain phantom.

Authors:  Andrea B Rosskopf; Elias Bachmann; Jess G Snedeker; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Florian M Buck
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Association of breast cancer risk, density, and stiffness: global tissue stiffness on breast MR elastography (MRE).

Authors:  Bhavika K Patel; Kay Pepin; Kathy R Brandt; Gina L Mazza; Barbara A Pockaj; Jun Chen; Yuxiang Zhou; Donald W Northfelt; Karen Anderson; Juliana M Kling; Celine M Vachon; Kristin R Swanson; Mehdi Nikkhah; Richard Ehman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 4.624

7.  Parameters affecting different acoustic radiation force impulse applications in the diagnosis of fibrotic liver changes.

Authors:  Sabrina Galgenmueller; Heike Jaeger; Wolfgang Kratzer; Stefan A Schmidt; Suemeyra Oeztuerk; Mark M Haenle; Richard A Mason; Tilmann Graeter
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Stiffness of the surrounding tissue of breast lesions evaluated by ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  JianQiao Zhou; WeiWei Zhan; YiJie Dong; ZhiFang Yang; Chun Zhou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Collagen I Fibrous Substrates Modulate the Proliferation and Secretome of Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Tumor Cells in a Hormone-Restricted Microenvironment.

Authors:  Ana M Reyes-Ramos; Yasmín R Álvarez-García; Natalia Solodin; Jorge Almodovar; Elaine T Alarid; Wandaliz Torres-Garcia; Maribella Domenech
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2021-03-10

10.  Evaluation of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification, a new shear wave velocity imaging method, for breast lesion assessment by ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael Golatta; Mirjam Schweitzer-Martin; Aba Harcos; Sarah Schott; Christina Gomez; Anne Stieber; Geraldine Rauch; Christoph Domschke; Joachim Rom; Florian Schütz; Christof Sohn; Jörg Heil
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.