Literature DB >> 9551016

The impact of mammography quality improvement legislation in Michigan: implications for the National Mammography Quality Standards Act.

L Fintor1, M Brown, R Fischer, O Suleiman, C Garlinghouse, J Camburn, E Frazier, F Houn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the impact of state legislation on mammography quality and access in Michigan.
METHODS: The impact of state legislation was analyzed with respect to utilization, numbers of machines and facilities, and image quality.
RESULTS: The legislation had a positive effect on image quality improvement, had no impact on utilization by women aged 50 years and above, and resulted in few facility closures.
CONCLUSIONS: Michigan's legislative intervention appears to have had a positive effect on efforts to improve mammography quality assurance with implications for other federal and state efforts to achieve quality assurance in health care delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9551016      PMCID: PMC1508437          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.88.4.667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  6 in total

1.  The design and implementation of a community breast cancer screening project.

Authors:  D G Sienko; J R Osuch; C Garlinghouse; V Rakowski; B Given
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Is the supply of mammography machines outstripping need and demand? An economic analysis.

Authors:  M L Brown; L G Kessler; F G Rueter
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-10-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Legislative and regulatory mandates for mammography quality assurance.

Authors:  L Fintor; M H Alciati; R Fischer
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.222

4.  Current practice of screening mammography in the United States: data from the National Survey of Mammography Facilities.

Authors:  F Houn; M L Brown
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  National survey of mammographic facilities in 1985, 1988, and 1992.

Authors:  B J Conway; O H Suleiman; F G Rueter; R G Antonsen; R J Slayton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  The history and the effect of the mammography quality assurance legislation in Michigan.

Authors:  J R Osuch; J F Camburn; D G Sienko; E J Potchen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Self-detection remains a key method of breast cancer detection for U.S. women.

Authors:  Mara Y Roth; Joann G Elmore; Joyce P Yi-Frazier; Lisa M Reisch; Natalia V Oster; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.681

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.