| Literature DB >> 23928861 |
Dinushika Thambugala1, Scott Duguid, Evelyn Loewen, Gordon Rowland, Helen Booker, Frank M You, Sylvie Cloutier.
Abstract
Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) is one of the richest plant sources of omega-3 fatty acids praised for their health benefits. In this study, the extent of the genetic variability of genes encoding stearoyl-ACP desaturase (SAD), and fatty acid desaturase 2 (FAD2) and 3 (FAD3) was determined by sequencing the six paralogous genes from 120 flax accessions representing a broad range of germplasm including some EMS mutant lines. A total of 6 alleles for sad1 and sad2, 21 for fad2a, 5 for fad2b, 15 for fad3a and 18 for fad3b were identified. Deduced amino acid sequences of the alleles predicted 4, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7 isoforms, respectively. Allele frequencies varied greatly across genes. Fad3a, with 110 SNPs and 19 indels, and fad3b, with 50 SNPs and 5 indels, showed the highest levels of genetic variations. While most of the SNPs and all the indels were silent mutations, both genes carried nonsense SNP mutations resulting in premature stop codons, a feature not observed in sad and fad2 genes. Some alleles and isoforms discovered in induced mutant lines were absent in the natural germplasm. Correlation of these genotypic data with fatty acid composition data of 120 flax accessions phenotyped in six field experiments revealed statistically significant effects of some of the SAD and FAD isoforms on fatty acid composition, oil content and iodine value. The novel allelic variants and isoforms identified for the six desaturases will be a resource for the development of oilseed flax with unique and useful fatty acid profiles.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23928861 PMCID: PMC3782649 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-013-2161-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theor Appl Genet ISSN: 0040-5752 Impact factor: 5.699
Allelic diversity for six fatty acid desaturases and their deduced isoforms
| Gene | Length | Exons | Introns | Exon length | Amino acids | Alleles | Isoforms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2,515 | 3 | 2 | 1,191 | 396 | 6 | 4 |
|
| 2,519 | 3 | 2 | 1,191 | 396 | 6 | 2 |
|
| 1,137 | 1 | – | 1,137 | 378 | 21 | 3 |
|
| 1,149 | 1 | – | 1,149 | 382 | 5 | 4 |
|
| 3,280 | 6 | 5 | 1,179 | 392 | 15 | 6 |
|
| 3,002 | 6 | 5 | 1,176 | 391 | 18 | 7 |
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of alleles and predicted isoforms of six desaturase genes and proteins obtained from sequencing these genes in 120 flax genotypes. SNPs and indels defining the alleles and their frequency in the germplasm are illustrated in the upper panels. Amino acid substitutions defining the isoforms, their frequency and corresponding alleles are illustrated in the lower panels. Exons are drawn as boxes and introns as lines. Deletions are represented by inverted triangles with the number of bases deleted. a sad1, b sad2, c fad2a, d fad2b, e fad3a, f fad3b. Fad3a alleles 13, 14 and 15 are not illustrated because they are hypervariable
SNPs and indels identified in sad and fad genes sequenced from 120 flax accessions
| Gene | SNP location | SNP frequency (SNP/100 bp) | Indel location | Indel frequency | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exon | Intron | Exon | Intron | (Indel/100 bp) | ||
|
| 3 | 7 | 0.40 | – | – | – |
|
| 2 | 5 | 0.28 | – | – | – |
|
| 8 | – | 0.70 | – | – | – |
|
| 5 | – | 0.44 | – | – | – |
|
| 14 | 96 | 3.35 | – | 19 | 0.58 |
|
| 10 | 40 | 1.66 | – | 5 | 0.17 |
Effect of SAD and FAD predicted isoforms on palmitic, stearic, oleic, linoleic and linolenic acid composition, oil content and iodine value
| Trait | Gene |
| Predicted isoforms or combinations† |
|---|---|---|---|
Palmitic acid (PAL) |
| 0.8225 0.6520 0.1886 0.8978 | |
|
| <.0001* | [E(7.84)]a, [A,B,C,D,F(5.96–5.59)]b | |
|
| <.0001* | [F(9.42)]a, [A,B,C,D,E,G(6.38–5.48)]b | |
| 0.8547 0.6547 | ||
|
| <.0001* | [EF(9.42)]a, [AA,AD,AE,AG,BD,CD,DC,DD,EB,FD(6.37–5.48)]b | |
Stearic acid (STE) |
| 0.1731 | |
|
| 0.0832 | ||
|
| 0.2950 | ||
|
| 0.1558 | ||
|
| 0.8507 | ||
|
| 0.2350 | ||
|
| 0.0425* | [CB(6.62)]a, [DB(4.60)]ab, [AA, AB,BB,(4.29–3.78)]b | |
|
| 0.3162 | ||
|
| 0.4552 | ||
Oleic acid (OLE) |
| 0.9703 | |
|
| 0.0083* | [B(21.64)]a, [A(19.71)]b | |
|
| 0.0067* | [A(20.79)]a, [C(18.35)]ab, [B(17.90)]b | |
|
| 0.3225 | ||
|
| 0.2275 | ||
|
| 0.0009* | (16.48–22.46)a | |
|
| 0.0944 | ||
|
| 0.0054* | (15.59–20.99)a | |
|
| 0.0031* | [FD(24.18)]a, [BD(23.77)]ab, [AA,AD,AE,AG,CD,DD(22.79–19.23)]abc, [DC(17.08)]bc, [EB,EF(16.78–16.46)]c | |
Linoleic acid (LIO) |
| 0.9220 | |
|
| 0.7126 | ||
|
| 0.0076* | [C(21.45)]a, [A,B(14.76–12.91)]b | |
|
| 0.9755 | ||
|
| <.0001* | [E(54.67)]a, [D(35.23)]b, [A,B,C,F(13.88–11.76)]c | |
|
| <.0001* | [B(58.52)]a, [C(55.49)]ab, [F(50.81)]b,[A,D,E,G(14.87–13.06)]c | |
|
| 0.9722 | ||
|
| 0.1268 | ||
|
| <.0001* | [EB(58.52)]a, [DC(55.49)]ab, [EF(50.81)]b, [DD(25.11)]c, [AA,AD,AE,AG,BD,CD,FD(14.87–11.76)]d | |
Linolenic acid (LIN) |
| 0.9643 | |
|
| 0.6721 | ||
|
| 0.0707 | ||
|
| 0.7270 | ||
|
| <.0001* | [A,B,C,F(58.08–52.70)]a, [D(35.86)]b, [E(16.80)]c | |
|
| <.0001* | [A,D,E,G(56.64–54.07)]a, [B,C,F(19.12–14.48)]b | |
|
| 0.9596 | ||
|
| 0.3172 | ||
|
| <.0001* | [AA,CD,AG(58.08–55.70)]a, [AD, AE,BD,FD(54.484–52.70)]ab, [DD(44.91)]b, [DC,EB,EF(19.12–14.48)]c | |
Oil content (OIL) |
| 0.9779 | |
|
| 0.9024 | ||
|
| 0.0004* | [A,C(44.14–42.80)]a, [B(39.90)]b | |
|
| 0.2108 | ||
|
| 0.0044* | [C,D(47.49–45.48)]a, [A,B,E(43.18–42.71)]ab, [F(39.68)]b | |
|
| 0.0136* | [C(48.46)]a,[A,B,D,E,F,G(43.81–42.31)]b | |
|
| 0.9955 | ||
|
| 0.0068* | [CA(44.20)]a, [AA,AB,AD,BA,CD(43.10–40.17)]ab, [BC(38.52)]b | |
|
| 0.0056* | [DC(48.46)]a, [CD,DD(47.00–45.48)]ab, [AD,AE,EF(43.81–43.54)]abc, [AA,AG,BD,EB(42.85–42.31)]bc, [FD(39.68)]c | |
Iodine value (IOD) |
| 0.9949 0.4642 0.3869 0.3647 | |
|
| <.0001* | [C(190.68)]a, [A,B,F(187.97–179.11)]ab, [D(170.86)]b, [E(152.96)]c | |
|
| <.0001* | [A,E,D,G(189.88–183.40)]a, [C,B,F(157.33–152.15)]b | |
| 0.9516 0.3689 | ||
|
| <.0001* | [AA,AD,AE,AG,BD,CD,DD,FD(190.68–177.63)]a, [DC,EB,EF(157.33–152.15)]b |
* Statistical significance (p < 0.05)
†Means for the isoform(s) or isoform combinations are in bracket. They represent data collected from two locations during three years
a, b, c Statistical significance of Duncan’s multiple range tests
Fig. 2Association between the predicted isoforms of a FAD3A/B and LIN content, b FAD3A and LIN content, c FAD3B and LIN content and d FAD3A/B and LIN and LIO contents. Vertical bars represent standard error of the mean. Letters on top of the bar indicate statistical significance of Duncan’s multiple range tests