Literature DB >> 23922189

What is normal femoral head/neck anatomy? An analysis of radial CT reconstructions in adolescents.

Amir A Jamali1, Walter Mak, Ping Wang, Lynn Tai, John P Meehan, Ramit Lamba.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cam morphology in femoroacetabular impingement has been implicated in the development of osteoarthritis. The alpha angle and femoral head/neck offset are widely used to determine femoral head asphericity. To our knowledge, no study has evaluated the alpha angle circumferentially using three-dimensional imaging in a population of healthy individuals of adolescent age. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to (1) determine normal values for the alpha angle in adolescents, (2) define the location along the neck with the highest alpha angle, and (3) determine normal femoral head and neck radii and femoral head/neck offset.
METHODS: Fifty CT scans from a database of scans obtained for reasons not related to hip pain were studied. The average age of the subjects was 15 years (range, 14-16 years). Alpha angle and femoral head/neck offset were measured circumferentially.
RESULTS: The alpha angle averaged 40.66 ± 4.46 mm for males and 37.77 ± 5.65 mm for females. The alpha angle generally was highest between the 11:40 and 12:40 o'clock and between the 6:00 and 7:40 o'clock positions. The femoral head radius was 24.53 ± 1.74 mm for males and 21.94 ± 1.13 mm for females, and the femoral neck radius was 16.14 ± 2.32 mm for males and 13.82 ± 2.38 mm for females. The mean femoral head/neck offset was 8.39 ± 1.97 mm for males and 8.13 ± 2.27 mm for females.
CONCLUSIONS: In this healthy population of 14- to 16-year-old subjects, the highest alpha angle was at the superior and inferior aspects of the heads rather than at the anterosuperior aspect. This information will provide benchmark values for distinction between normal and abnormal morphologic features of the femoral head.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23922189      PMCID: PMC3792287          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3166-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  14 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance arthrography of labral disorders in hips with dysplasia and impingement.

Authors:  Michael Leunig; David Podeszwa; Martin Beck; Stefan Werlen; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity.

Authors:  Dominik C Meyer; Martin Beck; Tom Ellis; Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Are the left and right proximal femurs symmetric?

Authors:  Ernest Y Young; Jeremy Gebhart; Daniel Cooperman; Nicholas U Ahn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Edward Zaragoza; Kambiz Motamedi; Nathan Copelan; Frederick J Dorey
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Kalesha Hack; Gina Di Primio; Kawan Rakhra; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset.

Authors:  K Ito; M A Minka; M Leunig; S Werlen; R Ganz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-03

7.  Femoral morphology differs between deficient and excessive acetabular coverage.

Authors:  S D Steppacher; M Tannast; S Werlen; K A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The prevalence of cam-type deformity of the hip joint: a survey of 4151 subjects of the Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study.

Authors:  K K Gosvig; S Jacobsen; S Sonne-Holm; P Gebuhr
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 9.  The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept.

Authors:  Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig; Katharina Leunig-Ganz; William H Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Digital templating and preoperative deformity analysis with standard imaging software.

Authors:  Amir A Jamali
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  4 in total

1.  Morphologic and angular planning for cam resection in femoro-acetabular impingement: value of the omega angle.

Authors:  Paulo Renato Amaral Rego; Vasco Mascarenhas; Filipe S Oliveira; Pedro C Pinto; Augusto Gaspar; Joana Ovídio; Diego G Collado
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Hip shape is symmetric, non-dependent on limb dominance and gender-specific: implications for femoroacetabular impingement. A 3D CT analysis in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Vasco V Mascarenhas; Paulo Rego; Pedro Dantas; Miguel Castro; Lennart Jans; Rui M Marques; Nélia Gouveia; Francisco Soldado; Olufemi R Ayeni; José G Consciência
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Arthroscopic versus open treatment of cam-type femoro-acetabular impingement: retrospective cohort clinical study.

Authors:  Paulo A Rego; Vasco Mascarenhas; Filipe S Oliveira; Pedro C Pinto; Eduardo Sampaio; Jacinto Monteiro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Age- and gender-specific variations of the epiphyseal tilt and epiphyseal angle in adolescents without hip pathology.

Authors:  E N Novais; K-P Kienle; P E Miller; G Bowen; Y-J Kim; S D Bixby
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.