Literature DB >> 29299653

Arthroscopic versus open treatment of cam-type femoro-acetabular impingement: retrospective cohort clinical study.

Paulo A Rego1, Vasco Mascarenhas2, Filipe S Oliveira3, Pedro C Pinto3, Eduardo Sampaio4, Jacinto Monteiro5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if there were significant differences between patients submitted to hip arthroscopy (HA) and surgical hip dislocation (SHD) to treat femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI), which variables were significantly associated with hip function before surgery and those predictive of the applied functional outcome scale and its variation rate after surgery.
METHODS: We selected 198 patients treated with HA or SHD with a mean follow-up of 59 months. Inclusion criteria were ages 18-50 years, isolated FAI cam morphology and complete clinical and radiologic documentation. The subjective outcome measure used was the nonarthritic hip score (NAHS). We compared pre-operative and post-operative NAHS, alpha angles and complication rates. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to find which variables could influence NAHS values.
RESULTS: The mean alpha-angle value improved from 71.5° to 40.8°, and mean NAHS improved from 50 to 83 points, with no difference between groups (HA/SHD). We found only a 16.9% influence rate on the pre-operative score, explained by variables of gender/pre-operative alpha angle and presence of degenerative changes/age. The influence rate on the NAHS variation ratio after surgery was 62.8%, explained by the variables of pre-operative score, type of surgery and type of surgery/alpha angle. The complication rate was 7%.
CONCLUSIONS: FAI surgery can be considered effective in improving patient symptoms. There were no differences in clinical or radiographic results between techniques. We could more accurately predict the variation ratio of NAHS after surgery than its pre-operative value.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cam; Femoro-acetabular impingement; Hip arthroscopy; Nonarthritic hip score; Results; Surgical hip dislocation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29299653     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3735-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  27 in total

1.  Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis.

Authors:  R Ganz; T J Gill; E Gautier; K Ganz; N Krügel; U Berlemann
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-11

2.  Reliability and agreement of measures used in radiographic evaluation of the adult hip.

Authors:  Nicholas H Mast; Franco Impellizzeri; Stephan Keller; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Hip arthroscopy: indications, outcomes, and complications.

Authors:  Joseph C McCarthy; Jo-ann Lee
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2006

4.  Vascular preservation during arthroscopic osteoplasty of the femoral head-neck junction: a cadaveric investigation.

Authors:  Patrick S Sussmann; Anil S Ranawat; Michael Shehaan; Dean Lorich; Douglas E Padgett; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 5.  Complications and reoperations during and after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of 92 studies and more than 6,000 patients.

Authors:  Joshua D Harris; Frank M McCormick; Geoffrey D Abrams; Anil K Gupta; Thomas J Ellis; Bernard R Bach; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Sex differences of hip morphology in young adults with hip pain and labral tears.

Authors:  Iftach Hetsroni; Katrina Dela Torre; Gavin Duke; Stephen Lyman; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Extended retinacular soft-tissue flap for intra-articular hip surgery: surgical technique, indications, and results of application.

Authors:  Reinhold Ganz; Thomas W Huff; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2009

Review 8.  Consistency of reported outcomes after arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Bandar M Hetaimish; Moin Khan; Sarah Crouch; Nicole Simunovic; Asheesh Bedi; Nicholas Mohtadi; Mohit Bhandari; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Preliminary pain and function after labral reconstruction during femoroacetabular impingement surgery.

Authors:  Justin A Walker; Michael Pagnotto; Robert T Trousdale; Rafael J Sierra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Sex Differences in Self-Reported Hip Function Up to 2 Years After Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Roody Joseph; Xueliang Pan; Kathleen Cenkus; Lindsey Brown; Thomas Ellis; Stephanie Di Stasi
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of outcome reporting trends for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome- a systematic review.

Authors:  Ida Lindman; Sarantos Nikou; Axel Öhlin; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Olufemi Ayeni; Jon Karlsson; Mikael Sansone
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-04-23

Review 2.  Incidence of heterotopic ossification following hip arthroscopy is low: considerations for routine prophylaxis.

Authors:  Zaki Arshad; Henry David Maughan; Malgorzata Garner; Erden Ali; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.479

3.  Revision Surgery and Progression to Total Hip Arthroplasty After Surgical Correction of Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Nicola Maffulli; Alice Baroncini; Jörg Eschweiler; Markus Tingart; Marcel Betsch
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Arthroscopic versus open treatment for femoroacetabular impingement: A systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Hu-Yun Qiao; Yong-Hong Zhang; Yi-Ming Ren; Meng-Qiang Tian
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.