Literature DB >> 23921676

Meiosis-I in Mesostoma ehrenbergii spermatocytes includes distance segregation and inter-polar movements of univalents, and vigorous oscillations of bivalents.

Jessica Ferraro-Gideon1, Carina Hoang, Arthur Forer.   

Abstract

In this article, we describe meiosis-I in spermatocytes of the free-living freshwater flatworm Mesostoma ehrenbergii. The original observations of Oakley (1983, 1985) and Fuge (Eur J Cell Biol 44:294-298, 1987, Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 13:212-220, 1989, Protoplasma 160:39-48, 1991), the first to describe these cells, challenge our understanding of cell division, and we have expanded on these descriptions with the aim of laying the framework for further experimental work. These cells contain three bivalents and four univalent chromosomes (two pairs). Bivalent kinetochores oscillate vigorously and regularly throughout prometaphase, for up to several hours, until anaphase. Anaphase onset usually begins in the middle of the kinetochore oscillation cycle. Precocious cleavage furrows form at the start of prometaphase, ingress and then remain arrested until the end of anaphase. The four univalents do not pair, yet by anaphase there is one of each kind at each pole, an example of "distance segregation" (Hughes-Schrader in Chromosoma 27:109-129, 1969). Until proper segregation is achieved, univalents move between spindle poles up to seven times in an individual cell; they move with velocities averaging 9 μm/min, which is faster than the oscillatory motions of the bivalent kinetochores (5-6 μm/min), and much faster than the anaphase movements of the segregating half-bivalents (1 μm/min). Bipolar bivalents periodically reorient, most often resulting in the partner kinetochores exchanging poles. We suggest that the large numbers of inter-polar movements of univalents, and the reorientations of bivalents that lead to partners exchanging poles, might be because there is non-random segregation of chromosomes, as in some other cell types.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23921676     DOI: 10.1007/s00709-013-0532-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protoplasma        ISSN: 0033-183X            Impact factor:   3.356


  39 in total

1.  Backward chromosome movement in crane-fly spermatocytes after UV microbeam irradiation of the interzone and a kinetochore.

Authors:  Raymond Wong; Arthur Forer
Journal:  Cell Biol Int       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Chromosome oscillations in mitosis.

Authors:  Otger Campàs; Pierre Sens
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  A mechanobiochemical mechanism for monooriented chromosome oscillation in mitosis.

Authors:  Jian Liu; Arshad Desai; José N Onuchic; Terence Hwa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Model of chromosome motility in Drosophila embryos: adaptation of a general mechanism for rapid mitosis.

Authors:  G Civelekoglu-Scholey; D J Sharp; A Mogilner; J M Scholey
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  What generates flux of tubulin in kinetochore microtubules?

Authors:  Arthur Forer; Jeremy D Pickett-Heaps; Tim Spurck
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.356

6.  The non-random chromosome segregation in spermatocytes of Gryllotalpa hexadactyla. A micromanipulation analysis.

Authors:  R Camenzind; R B Micklas
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 7.  Unusual chromosome movements in sciarid flies.

Authors:  S A Gerbi
Journal:  Results Probl Cell Differ       Date:  1986

8.  Complete kinetochore tracking reveals error-prone homologous chromosome biorientation in mammalian oocytes.

Authors:  Tomoya S Kitajima; Miho Ohsugi; Jan Ellenberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Chromosome fragments possessing only one kinetochore can congress to the spindle equator.

Authors:  A Khodjakov; R W Cole; B F McEwen; K F Buttle; C L Rieder
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1997-01-27       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Kinetochores moving away from their associated pole do not exert a significant pushing force on the chromosome.

Authors:  A Khodjakov; C L Rieder
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  4 in total

1.  Chromosomes selectively detach at one pole and quickly move towards the opposite pole when kinetochore microtubules are depolymerized in Mesostoma ehrenbergii spermatocytes.

Authors:  Eleni Fegaras; Arthur Forer
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.356

2.  Precocious cleavage furrows simultaneously move and ingress when kinetochore microtubules are depolymerized in Mesostoma ehrenbergii spermatocytes.

Authors:  Eleni Fegaras; Arthur Forer
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 3.  Chromosome interaction over a distance in meiosis.

Authors:  Mary Brady; Leocadia V Paliulis
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Evidence of Non-microtubule Spindle Forces in Mesostoma ehrenbergii Spermatocytes.

Authors:  Eleni Fegaras-Arch; Michael Berns; Arthur Forer
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2020-11-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.