Literature DB >> 17911248

A mechanobiochemical mechanism for monooriented chromosome oscillation in mitosis.

Jian Liu1, Arshad Desai, José N Onuchic, Terence Hwa.   

Abstract

During mitosis, the condensed chromosomes undergo a series of spectacular oscillations after they are captured in an end-on manner by kinetochore microtubules (KMT) emanating from the spindle poles. Such oscillations are commonly attributed to tug-of-war-like mechanisms, where the mechanical force imbalance alone drives the chromosome movement. However, a large portion of the force imbalance upon the chromosome is absorbed by the kinetochore and may not drive chromosome movement directly. Mounting evidence suggests that such resistance by the kinetochores regulates the chemical reactions of KMT plus-end growth and shrinkage, which have been shown as the determinant of the chromosome antipoleward (AP) and poleward movements. Here we incorporate this important regulatory feature, propose a mechanobiochemical feedback mechanism, and apply it to the monooriented chromosome oscillation, the early stage of the series of observed chromosome oscillations. In this model, the mechanical movement of the chromosome and the local biochemical reactions at the attached kinetochore region form a feedback loop that drives the oscillation. The force imbalance exerted on the chromosomes provides a bias (via mechanically sensitive proteins) on the local biochemical reactions controlling the KMT plus-end dynamics, and the movement of the chromosome in turn changes the forces exerted on it through the experimentally supported gradient in AP force. The proposed feedback mechanism can generate oscillatory behavior that depends on the topology of the feedback loop but is largely independent of the detailed molecular mechanism. We suggest potential molecular players, whose perturbation may allow direct experimental tests of the model.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17911248      PMCID: PMC2042169          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0707689104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  50 in total

1.  Measuring the stoichiometry and physical interactions between components elucidates the architecture of the vertebrate kinetochore.

Authors:  Michael J Emanuele; Mark L McCleland; David L Satinover; P Todd Stukenberg
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 2.  Translational control during mitosis.

Authors:  Magali Le Breton; Patrick Cormier; Robert Bellé; Odile Mulner-Lorillon; Julia Morales
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.079

3.  Tension-dependent regulation of microtubule dynamics at kinetochores can explain metaphase congression in yeast.

Authors:  Melissa K Gardner; Chad G Pearson; Brian L Sprague; Ted R Zarzar; Kerry Bloom; E D Salmon; David J Odde
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 4.138

4.  Chromosomes can congress to the metaphase plate before biorientation.

Authors:  Tarun M Kapoor; Michael A Lampson; Polla Hergert; Lisa Cameron; Daniela Cimini; E D Salmon; Bruce F McEwen; Alexey Khodjakov
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Polo-like kinase 1 creates the tension-sensing 3F3/2 phosphoepitope and modulates the association of spindle-checkpoint proteins at kinetochores.

Authors:  Leena J Ahonen; Marko J Kallio; John R Daum; Margaret Bolton; Isaac A Manke; Michael B Yaffe; P Todd Stukenberg; Gary J Gorbsky
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Mitotic chromatin regulates phosphorylation of Stathmin/Op18.

Authors:  S S Andersen; A J Ashford; R Tournebize; O Gavet; A Sobel; A A Hyman; E Karsenti
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-10-09       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Control of the Cdc2/cyclin B complex in Xenopus egg extracts arrested at a G2/M checkpoint with DNA synthesis inhibitors.

Authors:  A Kumagai; W G Dunphy
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.138

8.  Kinetochore motility after severing between sister centromeres using laser microsurgery: evidence that kinetochore directional instability and position is regulated by tension.

Authors:  R V Skibbens; C L Rieder; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Oscillating mitotic newt lung cell kinetochores are, on average, under tension and rarely push.

Authors:  J C Waters; R V Skibbens; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Plx1 is the 3F3/2 kinase responsible for targeting spindle checkpoint proteins to kinetochores.

Authors:  Oi Kwan Wong; Guowei Fang
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Microtubule assembly dynamics: new insights at the nanoscale.

Authors:  Melissa K Gardner; Alan J Hunt; Holly V Goodson; David J Odde
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 8.382

2.  An integrated mechanobiochemical feedback mechanism describes chromosome motility from prometaphase to anaphase in mitosis.

Authors:  Jian Liu; Arshad Desai; José N Onuchic; Terence Hwa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Force-generation and dynamic instability of microtubule bundles.

Authors:  Liedewij Laan; Julien Husson; E Laura Munteanu; Jacob W J Kerssemakers; Marileen Dogterom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Meiosis-I in Mesostoma ehrenbergii spermatocytes includes distance segregation and inter-polar movements of univalents, and vigorous oscillations of bivalents.

Authors:  Jessica Ferraro-Gideon; Carina Hoang; Arthur Forer
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.356

5.  Dynamic Instability from Non-equilibrium Structural Transitions on the Energy Landscape of Microtubule.

Authors:  Shannon F Stewman; Kenneth K Tsui; Ao Ma
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 10.304

Review 6.  Springs, clutches and motors: driving forward kinetochore mechanism by modelling.

Authors:  Elina Vladimirou; Ed Harry; Nigel Burroughs; Andrew D McAinsh
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Cell size modulates oscillation, positioning and length of mitotic spindles.

Authors:  Hongyuan Jiang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  A quantitative systems view of the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Andrea Ciliberto; Jagesh V Shah
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  NuSAP governs chromosome oscillation by facilitating the Kid-generated polar ejection force.

Authors:  Chenyu Li; Chenyi Xue; Qiaoyun Yang; Boon Chuan Low; Yih-Cherng Liou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.