Literature DB >> 2391953

Reference data for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: what results are equivalent to the established limits of office blood pressure?

P Baumgart1, P Walger, U Jürgens, K H Rahn.   

Abstract

In 1039 subjects ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed to define threshold values, which are equivalent to the established limits of the office blood pressure. Mean values and proportions of elevated single readings were correlated to office blood pressure by regression analyses. To avoid impact of varying sleeping periods on 24 h blood pressure, only daytime readings were considered. Correlations between average daytime blood pressure and office blood pressure were linear: Mean daytime values of 135 mmHg (systolic) and of 84 mmHg (diastolic) were equivalent to the casual blood pressure limits of 140 mmHg and 90 mmHg. Correlations between percentages of elevated single readings and office blood pressure were nonlinear: Proportions of 25% systolic readings greater than 140 mmHg and of 17% diastolic readings greater than 90 mmHg were equivalent to casual blood pressure limits of 140 mmHg and 90 mmHg. On the basis of the regression equations, any result of ambulatory blood pressure recording during daytime can now be evaluated in terms of the established standards of office blood pressure.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2391953     DOI: 10.1007/bf01647580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0023-2173


  13 in total

1.  Home versus office monitoring of blood pressure: a European multicentre study of high blood pressure.

Authors:  D L Clement
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1989-05

2.  Usefulness of ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure in assessing antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  W B White; J Morganroth
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1989-01-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  The 1988 report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-05

4.  Continuous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring versus casual blood pressure in borderline hypertension.

Authors:  A C Pessina; P Palatini; A Di Marco; P Mormino; G Fazio; M Libardoni; L Mos; E Casiglia; C Dal Palù
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.105

5.  Twenty-four-hour blood pressure is not dependent on endogenous circadian rhythm.

Authors:  P Baumgart; P Walger; G Fuchs; K G Dorst; H Vetter; K H Rahn
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  The reproducibility of average ambulatory, home, and clinic pressures.

Authors:  G D James; T G Pickering; L S Yee; G A Harshfield; S Riva; J H Laragh
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Ambulatory blood pressure in healthy normotensive males.

Authors:  H L Kennedy; M J Horan; M K Sprague; N E Padgett; K K Shriver
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  A quantitative analysis of the effects of activity and time of day on the diurnal variations of blood pressure.

Authors:  L A Clark; L Denby; D Pregibon; G A Harshfield; T G Pickering; S Blank; J H Laragh
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

9.  Definition of normalcy in whole-day ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  J I Drayer; M A Weber
Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens A       Date:  1985

10.  The prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressures.

Authors:  D Perloff; M Sokolow; R Cowan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  6 in total

1.  Noise perception, heart rate and blood pressure in relation to aircraft noise in the vicinity of the Frankfurt airport.

Authors:  Y Aydin; M Kaltenbach
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Noninvasive 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: current status.

Authors:  A Stanton; E O'Brien
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 3.  Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 2. Diagnosis of hypertension in adults.

Authors:  R B Haynes; Y Lacourcière; S W Rabkin; F H Leenen; A G Logan; N Wright; C E Evans
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in paediatric patients treated by regular haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  N Lingens; M Soergel; C Loirat; C Busch; B Lemmer; K Schärer
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in healthy schoolchildren.

Authors:  H Reichert; A Lindinger; O Frey; J Mortzeck; J Kiefer; C Busch; W Hoffmann
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  Antihypertensive efficacy of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil compared with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril.

Authors:  G Bönner; G L Bakris; D Sica; M A Weber; W B White; A Perez; C Cao; A Handley; S Kupfer
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.012

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.