Literature DB >> 2427894

Continuous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring versus casual blood pressure in borderline hypertension.

A C Pessina, P Palatini, A Di Marco, P Mormino, G Fazio, M Libardoni, L Mos, E Casiglia, C Dal Palù.   

Abstract

In 56 patients with borderline hypertension, casual blood pressure was compared with average daytime ambulatory blood pressure. The difference between these two values ranged from -20 to +40 mm Hg and was unrelated to spontaneous blood pressure variability, the blood pressure fall during sleep, and the peaks of pressure recorded during the day. Heart rate and a family history of hypertension were not predictive of the degree of difference between casual and average daytime recorder pressure. Target organ damage was present in 44% of the patients and was more closely correlated with recorder than with casual pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2427894     DOI: 10.1097/00005344-198608005-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol        ISSN: 0160-2446            Impact factor:   3.105


  1 in total

1.  Reference data for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: what results are equivalent to the established limits of office blood pressure?

Authors:  P Baumgart; P Walger; U Jürgens; K H Rahn
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1990-07-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.