| Literature DB >> 18416834 |
Paolo Bagnaresi1, Anna Moschella, Ottavio Beretta, Federico Vitulli, Paolo Ranalli, Pierdomenico Perata.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Since its discovery more than 100 years ago, potato (Solanum tuberosum) tuber cold-induced sweetening (CIS) has been extensively investigated. Several carbohydrate-associated genes would seem to be involved in the process. However, many uncertainties still exist, as the relative contribution of each gene to the process is often unclear, possibly as the consequence of the heterogeneity of experimental systems. Some enzymes associated with CIS, such as beta-amylases and invertases, have still to be identified at a sequence level. In addition, little is known about the early events that trigger CIS and on the involvement/association with CIS of genes different from carbohydrate-associated genes. Many of these uncertainties could be resolved by profiling experiments, but no GeneChip is available for the potato, and the production of the potato cDNA spotted array (TIGR) has recently been discontinued. In order to obtain an overall picture of early transcriptional events associated with CIS, we investigated whether the commercially-available tomato Affymetrix GeneChip could be used to identify which potato cold-responsive gene family members should be further studied in detail by Real-Time (RT)-PCR (qPCR).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18416834 PMCID: PMC2358903 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-176
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Explanation of parameters contained in the Global Match File.
| TOMATO_AFFY_ID | Tomato Probeset #ID | Tomato Affymetrix probeset identification |
| POTATO_EST | ID of aligning potato TA/EST | Potato TA/EST identification |
| DESCRIPTION | TIGR TA annotation | Updated TIGR annotation of potato TA/EST |
| %_ALIGN/TARG | Ratio between aligned portion of potato TA/EST against the total length of the tomato target (ALIGN_LENGTH/LENGTH_TOM)*100 | Rough alignment evaluation between the tomato target and potato TA/EST. |
| %_PERF_ALIGN | Corrected ratio between aligned portion of potato EST against the tomato target (%_ALIGN/TARG*%_IDENTITY)/100 | This improvement of %_ALIGN/TARG parameter is needed to get the percentage of the net alignment, thus hiding the effects of non-contiguous alignment regions. Scores of 100% mean that the entire length of the tomato target sequence is aligned. |
| %_STOP_DIST | Ratio between the position of the last nucleotide aligned in the tomato target against the total length of the tomato target (LAST_POS_TOM/LENGTH_TOM)*100. | - Similar, lower than 100% values of %_PERF_ALIGN and %_STOP_DIST suggest alignment interruption due to an intervening 3' UTR (outside coding sequence) |
Various indexes were developed in the Global Match File in order to characterize alignment quality between tomato target and matching potato counterparts. The most relevant parameters are listed above along with their intended use in terms of assessing alignment quality.
Figure 1Hierarchical clustering. Clustering of all 1,854 differentially expressed probesets (control 17°C vs. 4 day cold incubation at 4°C, two biological replicates for each condition as indicated) and the intersection between these probesets and those over the 70% perfect alignment (%_PERF_ALIGN) threshold. The length of each branch of the dendrogram indicates (1 – Pearson) correlation coefficients as a measure of similarity. The column between the dendrogram and the heatmap represents the probesets either differentially expressed and selected with the 70% perfect alignment threshold (yellow) and the probesets differentially expressed but not selected by the perfect alignment threshold (black).
Figure 2Probe-level analysis of GeneChip signals as affected by sequence mismatches. Signal intensity at a probe level in stress (A) vs control (B) GeneChip dataset as affected by sequence mismatches. SPS (Les.3522.1.S1_at; potato counterpart TA26174_4113; 2.96 fold induction) is shown as an example. The figure was generated as follows: based on the Global Match File, potato SPS (Transcript Assembly TA26174_4113) best aligns to the target sequence of probeset Les.3522.1.S1_at. Thus, the 11 probes (perfect match probes, PM) associated with this probeset (on the left, upper sequences) were aligned to TA26174_4113. The 25 nt-long potato subsequences that align to tomato probes are reported below the tomato probe sequences, numbered from 1 to 11. Mismatches are highlighted in red. Red and blue bars represent signal intensities associated with perfect match and mismatch probes, respectively. Similar intensities were obtained for the two biological replicates of control and cold conditions, but for the sake of clarity only one of the two GeneChip replicates is shown.
Figure 3Comparative evaluation of qPCR vs. GeneChip fold induction estimates. The ratios of fold-induction values of DEG as measured by GeneChip dataset and qPCR are plotted as percentage values against "Max Signal" values, which represent the highest average GeneChip signals, both in the control and cold-stressed dataset.
Heat shock upregulated genes.
| Les.269.1.S1_at | TA34173_411 | 94.31 | 4072.03 | 0.00129 | |
| LesAffx.10596.1.S1_at | BG888211 | 64.18 | 2561.36 | 0.00129 | |
| Les.4004.1.S1_a_at | TA25739_4113 | 149.19 | 5743.57 | 0.00140 | |
| Les.4819.1.S1_at | TA24545_4113 | 44.76 | 1295.63 | 0.00254 | |
| Les.3677.1.S1_at | TA35283_4113 | 16.02 | 396.81 | 0.00182 | |
| Les.4150.1.S1_at | TA29480_4113 | 173.18 | 1515.29 | 0.00287 | |
| Les.3160.3.S1_at | TA24543_4113 | 173.64 | 1294.13 | 0.00325 | |
| Les.3739.1.S1_at | TA42758_4113 | 4.30 | 20.16 | 0.04704 |
Signals are the averages of two biological replicates (avg. signal) for both control (17°C) and cold stress (4 days at 4°C) and fold changes represent the ratios of stress to control average signals. For a given probeset, potato best match refers to the best hit (highest perfect alignment score) between tomato target vs. potato TIGR TA entry as determined by the Global Match File. Adjusted P-value (Adj.P.Val) estimates false positives and refers to Benjamini-Hochberg's multiple test correction of the false discovery rate.
Selected, miscellaneous cold-responsive genes.
| Les.4223.1.S1_at | TA28833_4113 | 4.79 | 330.56 | 0.00189 | |
| Les.3967.1.S1_at | TA32068_4113 | 18.98 | 471.64 | 0.00129 | |
| LesAffx.23510.1.S1_at | TA42248_4113 | 12.66 | 140.28 | 0.00298 | |
| Les.5956.1.S1_s_at | TA23754_4113 | 130.33 | 1406.81 | 0.00276 | |
| Les.3273.1.S1_at | BM113620 Cold acclimation protein WCOR518 ( | 49.42 | 448.51 | 0.00321 | |
| Les.5011.1.S1_at | TA35430_4113 | 120.12 | 895.12 | 0.00239 | |
| Les.3341.1.S1_at | TA24917_4113 | 2079.22 | 5038.78 | 0.01200 | |
| Les.3691.1.S1_at | TA30474_4113 | 33.01 | 75.79 | 0.01080 | |
| Les.5957.1.S1_at | TA36769_4113 | 375.55 | 711.09 | 0.02172 |
Signals are the averages of two biological replicates (avg. signal) for both control (17°C) and cold stress (4 days at 4°C) and fold changes represent the ratios of stress to control average signals. Further details are as described in Table 2.
Flavonoid- and anthocyanin-related genes.
| Les.3649.1.S1_at | TA30979_4113 | 6.96 | 3965.21 | 0.00128 | |
| Les.3650.1.S1_at | TA30759_4113 | 15.17 | 2835.03 | 0.00391 | |
| LesAffx.68320.1.S1_at | TA41264_4113 | 6.97 | 1028.68 | 0.00128 | |
| Les.4271.1.S1_at | TA24485_4113 | 18.27 | 1845.22 | 0.00182 | |
| Les.2988.1.S1_at | TA25065_4113 | 84.47 | 1601.26 | 0.00182 | |
| Les.4412.1.A1_at | TA26173_4113 | 10.95 | 133.78 | 0.00209 |
Signals are the averages of two biological replicates (avg. signal) for both control (17°C) and cold stress (4 days at 4°C) and fold changes represent the ratios of stress to control average signals. Further details are as described in Table 2.
Figure 4Sucrose, glucose and fructose profiles in tubers incubated at 4°C. Sucrose, glucose and fructose profiles in tubers incubated at 4°C. Sugar accumulation was monitored during the cold incubation (4°C; 26 days). For each time point, three independent tubers were analyzed and data are plotted as means ± SD.
Figure 5Expression pattern of starch-associated genes as measured by qPCR. Transcript accumulation of St-BMY7 (TA23155_4113, showing best homology to Arabidopsis TRX-regulated β-amylase BMY7); PCT-BMYI (TA33682_4113; potato chloroplast-targeted β-amylase PCT-BMYI); glucan phosphorylase (TA24089_4113) and glucan-water dikinase (TA25853_4113) upon tuber incubation at 4°C was monitored over 26 days. The Relative Expression Level (REL) is reported (REL of the control, 17°C tubers equals 1).
Redox and thiol-signalling upregulated genes
| TA31380_4113 | 18.55 | 76.16 | 0.00466 | ||
| TA28486_4113 | 358.72 | 1338.27 | 0.00544 | ||
| TA27126_4113 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, putative ( | 85.67 | 291.78 | 0.00706 | ||
| TA29395_4113 | 135.03 | 409.47 | 0.00751 | ||
| TA30812_4113 | 64.19 | 169.95 | 0.04315 | ||
| TA32815_4113 | 8.92 | 21.09 | 0.03972 | ||
| TA35589_4113 | 14.64 | 30.82 | 0.04161 | ||
| BQ113042 Putative thioredoxin ( | 6.53 | 12.95 | 0.01720 | ||
| TA33226_4113 | 50.34 | 98.15 | 0.03015 | ||
| TA28250_4113 | 63.73 | 121.88 | 0.02755 |
Signals are the average of two biological replicates (avg. signal) for both control (17°C) and cold stress (4 days at 4°C) and fold changes represent the ratios of stress to control average signals. Further details are as described in Table 2.
Figure 6Expression pattern of invertases as measured by qPCR. Transcript accumulation of vacuolar acid invertase Pain-1 (TA26908_4113) and neutral invertase (TA42474_4113, "putative neutral/alkaline invertase, Cassava") upon tuber incubation at 4°C was monitored over 26 days. The Relative Expression Level (REL) is reported (REL of the control, 17°C tubers equals 1).
Figure 7Expression pattern of sucrose-associated enzymes as measured by qPCR. Transcript accumulation of sucrose synthase (SuSy; TA26908_4113), sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS; TA26174_4113) and UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (UGPase; TA24502_4113) upon tuber incubation at 4°C was monitored over 26 days. The Relative Expression Level (REL) is reported (REL of the control, 17°C tubers equals 1).
genes transcriptionally up-regulated by both ripening and cold.
| Les.1936.1.S1_at | 11.58 | 1990.21 | 0.00129 | TA27416_4113 | Early light inducible protein ( | |
| Les.4223.1.S1_at | 4.79 | 330.56 | 0.00189 | TA28833_4113 | alternative oxidase 1a ( | |
| Les.4829.1.S1_at | 14.26 | 586.14 | 0.00189 | CV498197 | 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase ( | |
| Les.3338.1.S1_at | 7.75 | 222.86 | 0.00300 | TA24335_4113 | S-adenosyl-L-methionine synthetase 1 ( | |
| Les.220.1.S1_at | 8.10 | 226.46 | 0.00182 | TA25585_4113 | AER ( | |
| LesAffx.49935.1.S1_at | 20.28 | 510.32 | 0.00384 | TA28438_4113 | Pyruvate decarboxylase ( | |
| Les.3551.1.S1_at | 17.51 | 390.08 | 0.00255 | CV475083 | Ethylene-responsive transcriptional coactivator (ER24)( | |
| Les.2988.1.S1_at | 84.47 | 1601.26 | 0.00182 | TA25065_4113 | Cinnamic acid 4-hydroxylase ( | |
| LesAffx.44987.1.S1_at | 13.27 | 222.49 | 0.00175 | TA38177_4113 | Solanesyl diphosphate synthase (Hevea brasiliensis (Para rubber tree) geranyl diphosphate synthase ( | |
| Les.3651.1.S1_at | 108.84 | 1738.28 | 0.00224 | TA24332_4113 | S-adenosyl-L-methionine synthetase ( | |
| Les.2560.1.S1_at | 7.42 | 103.61 | 0.00226 | TA25537_4113 | Ethylene-forming enzyme ( | |
| Les.4412.1.A1_at | 10.95 | 133.78 | 0.00209 | TA26173_4113 | Leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase 2, putative ( | |
| Les.5956.1.S1_s_at | 130.33 | 1406.81 | 0.00276 | TA23754_4113 | Cold-stress inducible protein (CI7) ( | |
| Les.4150.1.S1_at | 173.18 | 1515.29 | 0.00287 | TA29480_4113 | Mitochondrial small heat-shock protein ( | |
| Les.5826.1.S1_at | 136.17 | 1105.79 | 0.00226 | TA28749_4113 | Cathepsin B-like cysteine proteinase ( | |
| LesAffx.1959.1.S1_at | 28.53 | 224.93 | 0.00224 | TA25003_4113 | Glutathione S-transferase. class-phi ( | |
| LesAffx.47187.1.S1_at | 41.05 | 293.51 | 0.00236 | TA36088_4113 | Universal stress protein/early nodulin ENOD18-like [64]; TC123970 | |
| Les.3171.3.S1_a_at | 18.56 | 120.71 | 0.00249 | TA30735_4113 | Phytoene synthase. chloroplast precursor ( | |
| Les.3813.1.S2_at | 142.73 | 855.96 | 0.01985 | TA23078_4113 | S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase proenzyme [64]; TC123879 | |
| Les.3085.1.S1_at | 28.13 | 178.22 | 0.00391 | BG888309 | Flavonol synthase/flavanone 3-hydroxylase ( | |
| Les.3285.1.S1_at | 311.71 | 1908.05 | 0.00384 | TA27830_4113 | Acyl carrier protein ( | |
| LesAffx.34336.1.S1_at | 65.09 | 382.59 | 0.00895 | TA46602_4113 | 70 kD heat-shock protein ( | |
| Les.4573.1.S1_at | 28.35 | 150.86 | 0.00889 | TA28898_4113 | Guanylate kinase ( | |
| LesAffx.69795.1.S1_at | 27.80 | 148.00 | 0.00458 | TA37100_4113 | Putative methionine sulfoxide reductase B ( | |
| Les.274.1.S1_at | 8.38 | 29.61 | 0.01158 | BQ046569 | Ripening regulated protein DDTFR10/A ( | |
| Les.824.1.S1_at | 64.19 | 169.95 | 0.04315 | TA30812_4113 | Glucose-6-phosphate 1-dehydrogenase precursor ( | |
| Les.2702.1.S1_a_at | 7.53 | 20.97 | 0.03637 | TA26908_4113 | Acid invertase ( | |
| Les.205.1.S1_at | 174.85 | 461.58 | 0.00847 | TA24762_4113 | 14-3-3 protein ( | |
| Les.2992.1.S1_a_at | 87.62 | 225.46 | 0.01367 | BQ504492 | Callus-expressing factor ( | |
| Les.3933.1.S1_at | 1933.65 | 4519.78 | 0.00978 | TA24146_4113 | Adenosylhomocysteinase ( | |
| LesAffx.10807.1.S1_at | 18.17 | 35.73 | 0.01649 | TA28665_4113 | Heat-shock cognate 70 kDa protein ( | |
| LesAffx.32723.1.S1_at | 40.30 | 68.27 | 0.03380 | TA26759_4113 | BZIP transcription factor ATB2 ( | |
| Les.283.1.S1_at | 138.53 | 228.92 | 0.03786 | CV477421 | Induced stolon tip protein ( | |
| Les.303.1.S1_at | 5852.89 | 9264.98 | 0.04951 | TA24257_4113 | Enolase ( |
Selected entries from a set of genes, which are transcriptionally up-regulated by both ripening (various databases as indicated) and cold (our GeneChip dataset). TED database [64] refers to a recent list of tomato ripening-up-regulated genes (transition from mature green to breaker stage) and the ID of the corresponding tomato Tentative Consensus (TC) entry is reported. Fold changes represent the ratios of stress to control average signals (two biological replicates for both control and stress conditions). Further details are as described in Table 2.
Figure 8Expression pattern of ethylene-associated enzymes as measured by qPCR. Transcript accumulation of ACO1 (TA25537_4113) and ER24 (CV475083) upon tuber incubation at 4°C was monitored over 26 days. The Relative Expression Level (REL) is reported (REL of control, 17°C tubers equals 1).