Literature DB >> 23918633

Primer evaluation and adaption for cost-efficient SYBR Green-based qPCR and its applicability for specific quantification of methanogens.

Christoph Reitschuler1, Philipp Lins, Paul Illmer.   

Abstract

In the present study nine promising primer sets, targeting Archaea and methanogenic Archaea in particular, were evaluated in silico, in vitro and in situ concerning specificity, accuracy and applicability in end-point (ep-) and especially quantitative (q-)PCR research. The main goal was to adapt and evaluate already adapted primer sets, which were partially designed in combination with TaqMan probes, in substantially cheaper SYBR Green-based qPCR applications. An initial 16S rRNA gene bank-based in silico evaluation revealed high coverage potentials for all primers within targeted groups, ranging from 71 to 90%, except the Methanosaeta specific set showing a low potential of 37%. Mentionable cross-reacting potentials could be detected for the Methanothermobacter, Methanomicrobiales and Methanoculleus sets. The in vitro evaluation with selected reference organisms revealed a specific behavior for most primer sets, while the Methanosarcina and Methanothermobacter sets showed most problematic cross-reactions in epPCR application. We were able to show that primers for detecting the total archaeal community, methanogenic orders Methanosarcinales, Methanobacteriales, Methanococcales and the genus Methanoculleus performed in a highly specific way and allowed an accurate quantification of targeted organisms without the use of expensive TaqMan probes. However, primer pairs designed for detecting Methanomicrobiales, Methanothermobacter, Methanosarcina and Methanosaeta are not suitable for SYBR Green applications. The reliability of in situ quantifications was assessed for a typical methanogenic community, derived from a thermophilic fermenter, and confirmed via denaturing gradient gel band quantification and sequencing. Thereby, we revealed high abundances of methanogenic Archaea, mainly comprising Methanoculleus and Methanosarcinales, while Methanobacteriales only formed a minor fraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23918633     DOI: 10.1007/s11274-013-1450-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0959-3993            Impact factor:   3.312


  36 in total

1.  The mcrA gene as an alternative to 16S rRNA in the phylogenetic analysis of methanogen populations in landfill.

Authors:  Philip E Luton; Jonathan M Wayne; Richard J Sharp; Paul W Riley
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.777

2.  AutoDimer: a screening tool for primer-dimer and hairpin structures.

Authors:  Peter M Vallone; John M Butler
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.993

3.  Enumeration of Archaea and Bacteria in seafloor basalt using real-time quantitative PCR and fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Jørn Einen; Ingunn H Thorseth; Lise Ovreås
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Ability of DNA content and DGGE analysis to reflect the performance condition of an anaerobic biowaste fermenter.

Authors:  Cornelia Malin; Paul Illmer
Journal:  Microbiol Res       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 5.415

5.  Development and evaluation of inocula combating high acetate concentrations during the start-up of an anaerobic digestion.

Authors:  Philipp Lins; Christoph Reitschuler; Paul Illmer
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 9.642

6.  Effect of dilution rate on structure of a mesophilic acetate-degrading methanogenic community during continuous cultivation.

Authors:  Toru Shigematsu; Yueqin Tang; Hiromi Kawaguchi; Kana Ninomiya; Junji Kijima; Tsutomu Kobayashi; Shigeru Morimura; Kenji Kida
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Quantification of mcrA by fluorescent PCR in methanogenic and methanotrophic microbial communities.

Authors:  Takuro Nunoura; Hanako Oida; Junichi Miyazaki; Ai Miyashita; Hiroyuki Imachi; Ken Takai
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 4.194

8.  Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies.

Authors:  Anna Klindworth; Elmar Pruesse; Timmy Schweer; Jörg Peplies; Christian Quast; Matthias Horn; Frank Oliver Glöckner
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Genomic DNA functions as a universal external standard in quantitative real-time PCR.

Authors:  James J Yun; Lawrence E Heisler; Irene I L Hwang; Olivia Wilkins; Suzanne K Lau; Martin Hyrcza; Bamini Jayabalasingham; Jing Jin; JoAnne McLaurin; Ming-Sound Tsao; Sandy D Der
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Eukaryotic genome size databases.

Authors:  T Ryan Gregory; James A Nicol; Heidi Tamm; Bellis Kullman; Kaur Kullman; Ilia J Leitch; Brian G Murray; Donald F Kapraun; Johann Greilhuber; Michael D Bennett
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  3 in total

1.  Archaeal Distribution in Moonmilk Deposits from Alpine Caves and Their Ecophysiological Potential.

Authors:  Christoph Reitschuler; Christoph Spötl; Katrin Hofmann; Andreas O Wagner; Paul Illmer
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Spiking a Silty-Sand Reference Soil with Bacterial DNA: Limits and Pitfalls in the Discrimination of Live and Dead Cells When Applying Ethidium Monoazide (EMA) Treatment.

Authors:  Andreas O Wagner; Nadine Praeg; Paul Illmer
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Effect of DNA extraction procedure, repeated extraction and ethidium monoazide (EMA)/propidium monoazide (PMA) treatment on overall DNA yield and impact on microbial fingerprints for bacteria, fungi and archaea in a reference soil.

Authors:  Andreas O Wagner; Nadine Praeg; Christoph Reitschuler; Paul Illmer
Journal:  Appl Soil Ecol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.046

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.