Literature DB >> 23918218

Imaging features of sporadic breast cancer in women under 40 years old: 97 cases.

Bénédicte Bullier1, Gaétan MacGrogan, Hervé Bonnefoi, Gabrielle Hurtevent-Labrot, Edouard Lhomme, Véronique Brouste, Martine Boisserie-Lacroix.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate characteristic features of mammography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of sporadic breast cancer in women <40 years and to determine correlations with pathological and biological factors.
METHODS: A retrospective review of radiological, clinicopathological and biological features of sporadic breast cancers for women under 40 years at our institution between 2007-2012 covering 91 patients. Mammography was available for 97 lesions, ultrasound for 94 and MRI for 38.
RESULTS: The most common imaging features were masses, nearly all classified BI-RADS 4 or 5. On mammography microcalcifications alone accounted for 31 %, all suspicious. There were 42.6 % luminal B, 24.5 % luminal A, 19.1 % HER2-enriched and 10.6 % triple-negative (TN) tumours by immunohistochemistry. HER2 overexpression was correlated with the presence of calcifications at mammography (P = 0.03). TN cancers more often had an oval shape and abrupt interface at ultrasound and rim enhancement on MRI. MRI features were suspicious for all cancers and rim enhancement of a mass was a significant predictor of triple-negative tumours (P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The imaging characteristics of cancers in patients under 40 years without proven gene mutations do not differ from their older counterparts, but appear correlated to phenotypic profiles, which have a different distribution in young women compared to the general population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23918218     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2966-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  31 in total

1.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Debbie Saslow; Kimberly Andrews Sawyer; Wylie Burke; Mary E Costanza; W Phil Evans; Roger S Foster; Edward Hendrick; Harmon J Eyre; Steven Sener
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; David O Cosgrove; Caroline J Doré; Fritz K W Schäfer; William E Svensson; Regina J Hooley; Ralf Ohlinger; Ellen B Mendelson; Catherine Balu-Maestro; Martina Locatelli; Christophe Tourasse; Barbara C Cavanaugh; Valérie Juhan; A Thomas Stavros; Anne Tardivon; Joel Gay; Jean-Pierre Henry; Claude Cohen-Bacrie
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years.

Authors:  Bonnie C Yankaskas; Sebastien Haneuse; Julie M Kapp; Karla Kerlikowske; Berta Geller; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Accuracy and value of breast ultrasound for primary imaging evaluation of symptomatic women 30-39 years of age.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Christoph I Lee; Vilert A Loving; Michael S Portillo; Sue Peacock; Wendy B DeMartini
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  The diagnosis of breast cancer in women younger than 40.

Authors:  L M Foxcroft; E B Evans; A J Porter
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.380

7.  Breast cancer in Chinese women younger than age 40: are they different from their older counterparts?

Authors:  Ava Kwong; Polly Cheung; Stephanie Chan; Silvia Lau
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Sonographic features of breast carcinoma presenting as masses in BRCA gene mutation carriers.

Authors:  Benoît Mesurolle; Laurence Kadoch; Mona El-Khoury; André Lisbona; Nandini Dendukuri; William D Foulkes
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Triple-negative breast cancer: correlation between MR imaging and pathologic findings.

Authors:  Takayoshi Uematsu; Masako Kasami; Sachiko Yuen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Younger age as a prognostic indicator in breast cancer: a cohort study.

Authors:  Elrasheid H A Kheirelseid; Jennifer M E Boggs; Catherine Curran; Ronan W Glynn; Cara Dooley; Karl J Sweeney; Michael J Kerin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  8 in total

1.  Assessing Inaccuracies in Automated Information Extraction of Breast Imaging Findings.

Authors:  Ronilda Lacson; Martha E Goodrich; Kimberly Harris; Phyllis Brawarsky; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Evaluation of an Automated Information Extraction Tool for Imaging Data Elements to Populate a Breast Cancer Screening Registry.

Authors:  Ronilda Lacson; Kimberly Harris; Phyllis Brawarsky; Tor D Tosteson; Tracy Onega; Anna N A Tosteson; Abby Kaye; Irina Gonzalez; Robyn Birdwell; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Clinical Data as an Adjunct to Ultrasound Reduces the False-Negative Malignancy Rate in BI-RADS 3 Breast Lesions.

Authors:  S Ackermann; C-A Schoenenberger; R Zanetti-Dällenbach
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2016-07-19

4.  Heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer: mammographic, US, and MR imaging features according to androgen receptor expression.

Authors:  Min Sun Bae; So Yeon Park; Sung Eun Song; Won Hwa Kim; Su Hyun Lee; Wonshik Han; In-Ae Park; Dong-Young Noh; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Imaging Findings and Clinicopathological Correlation of Breast Cancer in Women under 40 Years Old.

Authors:  Gamze Durhan; Aynur Azizova; Ömer Önder; Kemal Kösemehmetoğlu; Jale Karakaya; Meltem Gülsün Akpınar; Figen Demirkazık; Ayşegül Üner
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2019-07-01

6.  The biology of malignant breast tumors has an impact on the presentation in ultrasound: an analysis of 315 cases.

Authors:  S Wojcinski; N Stefanidou; P Hillemanns; F Degenhardt
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Stromal Fibrosis of the Breast: A Spectrum of Benign to Malignant Imaging Appearances.

Authors:  Lara Nassar; Amro Baassiri; Fatima Salah; Andrew Barakat; Elie Najem; Fouad Boulos; Ghina Berjawi
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2019-02-03

8.  Mammographic tumour appearance is related to clinicopathological factors and surrogate molecular breast cancer subtype.

Authors:  Li Sturesdotter; Malte Sandsveden; Kristin Johnson; Anna-Maria Larsson; Sophia Zackrisson; Hanna Sartor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.