Literature DB >> 25224727

Heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer: mammographic, US, and MR imaging features according to androgen receptor expression.

Min Sun Bae1, So Yeon Park, Sung Eun Song, Won Hwa Kim, Su Hyun Lee, Wonshik Han, In-Ae Park, Dong-Young Noh, Woo Kyung Moon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine whether triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) with and without androgen receptor (AR) expression have distinguishing imaging features on mammography, breast ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
METHODS: AR expression was assessed immunohistochemically in 125 patients with TNBC from a consecutive series of 1,086 operable invasive breast cancers. Two experienced radiologists blinded to clinicopathological findings reviewed all imaging studies in consensus using the BI-RADS lexicon. The imaging and pathological features of 33 AR-positive TNBCs were compared with those of 92 AR-negative TNBCs.
RESULTS: The presence of mammographic calcifications with or without a mass (p < 0.001), non-mass enhancement on MR imaging (p < 0.001), and masses with irregular shape or spiculated margins on US (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002) and MR imaging (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001) were significantly associated with AR-positive TNBC. Compared with AR-negative TNBC, AR-positive TNBC was more likely to have a ductal carcinoma in situ component (59.8% vs. 90.9%, p = 0.001) and low Ki-67 expression (30.4% vs. 51.5%, p = 0.030).
CONCLUSION: AR-positive and AR-negative TNBCs have different imaging features, and certain imaging findings can be useful to predict AR status in TNBC. KEY POINTS: • Triple-negative breast cancers have distinguishing imaging features according to AR expression. • AR-positive TNBC is associated with calcifications, spiculated masses, and non-mass enhancement. • Multimodality imaging can help predict androgen receptor status in TNBC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25224727     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3419-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  39 in total

1.  Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies.

Authors:  Brian D Lehmann; Joshua A Bauer; Xi Chen; Melinda E Sanders; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Yu Shyr; Jennifer A Pietenpol
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breasts: review of MR imaging features.

Authors:  Heather I Greenwood; Samantha L Heller; Sungheon Kim; Eric E Sigmund; Sara D Shaylor; Linda Moy
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Correlation of sonographic features of invasive ductal mammary carcinoma with age, tumor grade, and hormone-receptor status.

Authors:  Michael Aho; Abid Irshad; Susan J Ackerman; Madelene Lewis; Rebecca Leddy; Thomas L Pope; Amy S Campbell; Abbie Cluver; Bethany J Wolf; Joan E Cunningham
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 0.910

4.  Quantitative MRI morphology of invasive breast cancer: correlation with immunohistochemical biomarkers and subtypes.

Authors:  Min Sun Bae; Mirinae Seo; Kwang Gi Kim; In-Ae Park; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  Survival outcomes of breast cancer patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy: association with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with computer-aided evaluation.

Authors:  Ann Yi; Nariya Cho; Seock-Ah Im; Jung Min Chang; Seung Ja Kim; Hyeung-Gon Moon; Wonshik Han; In-Ae Park; Dong-Young Noh; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Breast carcinoma with basal phenotype: mammographic findings.

Authors:  Angela A Luck; Andrew J Evans; Jonathan J James; Emad A Rakha; E Claire Paish; Andrew R Green; Ian O Ellis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Mammographic features of calcifications in DCIS: correlation with oestrogen receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status.

Authors:  Min Sun Bae; Woo Kyung Moon; Jung Min Chang; Nariya Cho; So Yeon Park; Jae-Kyung Won; Yoon-Kyung Jeon; Hyeong-Gon Moon; Wonshik Han; In Ae Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Androgen receptor expression and outcomes in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francisco E Vera-Badillo; Arnoud J Templeton; Paulo de Gouveia; Ivan Diaz-Padilla; Philippe L Bedard; Mustafa Al-Mubarak; Bostjan Seruga; Ian F Tannock; Alberto Ocana; Eitan Amir
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  The biology of malignant breast tumors has an impact on the presentation in ultrasound: an analysis of 315 cases.

Authors:  S Wojcinski; N Stefanidou; P Hillemanns; F Degenhardt
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Clinically meaningful tumor reduction rates vary by prechemotherapy MRI phenotype and tumor subtype in the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657).

Authors:  Rita A Mukhtar; Christina Yau; Mark Rosen; Vickram J Tandon; Nola Hylton; Laura J Esserman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  10 in total

1.  Role of DCE-MR in predicting breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Marco Macchini; Martina Ponziani; Andrea Prochowski Iamurri; Mirco Pistelli; Mariagrazia De Lisa; Rossana Berardi; Gian Marco Giuseppetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Imaging features of triple-negative breast cancers according to androgen receptor status.

Authors:  Rosalind P Candelaria; Beatriz E Adrada; Wei Wei; Alastair M Thompson; Lumarie Santiago; Deanna L Lane; Monica L Huang; Elsa M Arribas; Gaiane M Rauch; W Fraser Symmans; Michael Z Gilcrease; Lei Huo; Bora Lim; Naoto T Ueno; Stacy L Moulder; Wei Tse Yang
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 3.  The Changing World of Breast Cancer: A Radiologist's Perspective.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Immunohistochemical Subtypes of Breast Cancer: Correlation with Clinicopathological and Radiological Factors.

Authors:  Yu-Mee Sohn; Kyunghwa Han; Mirinae Seo
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 0.212

5.  Clinical predictors of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Ayako Nakashoji; Akira Matsui; Aiko Nagayama; Yuko Iwata; Manami Sasahara; Yuya Murata
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Contrast Enhancement on Cone-Beam Breast-CT for Discrimination of Breast Cancer Immunohistochemical Subtypes.

Authors:  Johannes Uhlig; Uwe Fischer; Eva von Fintel; Vera Stahnke; Christina Perske; Joachim Lotz; Susanne Wienbeck
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  Cone-beam Breast Computed Tomography: CT Density Does Not Reflect Proliferation Potential and Receptor Expression of Breast Carcinoma.

Authors:  Susanne Wienbeck; Uwe Fischer; Christina Perske; Andreas Wienke; Hans Jonas Meyer; Joachim Lotz; Alexey Surov
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.243

8.  Investigation of Association Between Borderline Pancreatic Head Cancer and Glucose Uptake by Using Positron-Emission Tomographic Studies.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Lei Qin; Changming Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-10-16

Review 9.  Combining Diagnostic Imaging and Pathology for Improving Diagnosis and Prognosis of Cancer.

Authors:  Orazio Schillaci; Manuel Scimeca; Nicola Toschi; Rita Bonfiglio; Nicoletta Urbano; Elena Bonanno
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.161

10.  Characterization of breast cancer subtypes based on quantitative assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity using dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jin Joo Kim; Jin You Kim; Hie Bum Suh; Lee Hwangbo; Nam Kyung Lee; Suk Kim; Ji Won Lee; Ki Seok Choo; Kyung Jin Nam; Taewoo Kang; Heeseung Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 5.315

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.