Literature DB >> 23917166

Contemporary management of regional nodes in penile cancer-improvement of survival?

Rosa S Djajadiningrat1, Niels M Graafland1, Erik van Werkhoven2, Wim Meinhardt1, Axel Bex1, Henk G van der Poel1, Hester H van Boven3, Renato A Valdés Olmos4, Simon Horenblas5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The management of regional nodes of penile squamous cell carcinoma has changed with time due to improved knowledge about diagnosis and treatment. To determine whether changes in the treatment of regional nodes have improved survival, we compared contemporary 5-year cancer specific survival of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis with that of patients in previous cohorts.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an observational cohort study of 1,000 patients treated during 56 years 944 were eligible for analysis. Tumors were staged according to the 2009 TNM classification, and patients were divided into 4 cohorts of 1956 to 1987, 1988 to 1993, 1994 to 2000 and 2001 to 2012, reflecting changes in clinical practice regarding regional nodes. Kaplan-Meier survival curves with the log rank test and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to examine trends in 5-year cancer specific survival.
RESULTS: The 5-year cancer specific survival of patients with cN0 disease treated between 2001 and 2012 was 92% compared to 89% (1994 to 2000), 78% (1988 to 1993) and 85% (1956 to 1987). The 5-year cancer specific survival improved significantly since 1994, the year dynamic sentinel node biopsy was introduced, at 91% (1994 to 2012) vs 82% (1956 to 1993) (p = 0.021). This conclusion still holds after adjustment for pathological T stage and grade of differentiation (HR 2.46, p = 0.01). Extranodal extension, number of tumor positive nodes and pelvic involvement in node positive (pN+) cases were associated with worse 5-year cancer specific survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite less surgery being performed on regional nodes, 5-year cancer specific survival has improved in patients with cN0 disease. The number of tumor positive nodes, extranodal extension and pelvic involvement were highly associated with worse cancer specific survival in patients with pN+ disease. In this group other treatment strategies are needed as no improvement was observed.
Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSS; DSNB; ENE; SCCp; cancer specific survival; carcinoma; dynamic sentinel node biopsy; extranodal extension; iLND; inguinal lymph node dissection; lymphatic metastasis; penile neoplasms; sentinel lymph node biopsy; squamous cell; squamous cell carcinoma of the penis; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23917166     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  21 in total

1.  [Organ-preserving therapy for penile carcinoma].

Authors:  O W Hakenberg; C Protzel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Contemporary management of patients with penile cancer and lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Andrew Leone; Gregory J Diorio; Curtis Pettaway; Viraj Master; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  [Urethral centralization and pseudo-glans formation after partial penectomy].

Authors:  J Kranz; A Parnham; M Albersen; V Sahdev; M Ziada; R Nigam; A Muneer; J Steffens; P Malone
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in renal malignancy: The past, present and future.

Authors:  Tharani Mahesan; Alberto Coscione; Ben Ayres; Nick Watkin
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-06

Review 5.  Sentinel node biopsy and lymphatic mapping in penile and prostate cancer.

Authors:  H G van der Poel; P Meershoek; N Grivas; G KleinJan; F W B van Leeuwen; S Horenblas
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Challenges and controversies in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Majid Shabbir; Oliver Kayes; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  [Lymph node management of cN0 penile cancer].

Authors:  F Wawroschek; A Winter
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Immune-based therapies in penile cancer.

Authors:  Vidhu B Joshi; Philippe E Spiess; Andrea Necchi; Curtis A Pettaway; Jad Chahoud
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 16.430

9.  Clinical Significance of p53 and p16(ink4a) Status in a Contemporary North American Penile Carcinoma Cohort.

Authors:  Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Philippe E Spiess; Anders E Berglund; Pranav Sharma; Julio M Powsang; Anna Giuliano; Anthony M Magliocco; Jasreman Dhillon
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.872

10.  The Diagnosis and Treatment of Penile Cancer.

Authors:  Oliver Walther Hakenberg; Desiree Louise Dräger; Andreas Erbersdobler; Carsten Maik Naumann; Klaus-Peter Jünemann; Chris Protzel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.