Literature DB >> 29470655

[Lymph node management of cN0 penile cancer].

F Wawroschek1, A Winter2.   

Abstract

In penile cancer, lymph node metastasis is the main known prognostic factor affecting patients' survival. Early inguinal lymph node dissection or the resection of clinically occult lymph node metastases improves survival compared with removal when the metastases become clinically apparent. Micrometastatic lymph node involvement is undetectable by current imaging modalities. Nomograms based on clinical and histopathological tumor characteristics are unreliable in predicting lymph node involvement. Consequently, in penile cancer patients with clinically normal inguinal lymph nodes (cN0) and a tumor stage ≥pT1, G2 surgical lymph node exploration is recommended. Radical inguinal lymphadenectomy is no longer recommended because of its invasiveness and high complication rate. Modified lymphadenectomy and dynamic sentinel lymph node surgery allow the detection of lymph node-positive patients with sufficient certainty. Thereby, the sentinel lymph node approach offers the least invasiveness and high sensitivity. Extended inguinal lymphadenectomy is still recommended in the case of positive nodes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic sentinel lymphadenectomy; Inguinal lymphadenectomy; Metastasis; Sentinel lymph node

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29470655     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-018-0598-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  31 in total

Review 1.  Lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Part 2: the role and technique of lymph node dissection.

Authors:  S Horenblas
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Radical excision of the inguinal and iliac lymph glands; a study based upon 450 anatomical dissections and upon supportive clinical observations.

Authors:  E H DASELER; B J ANSON; A F REIMANN
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1948-12

3.  Unreliability of modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for clinical staging of penile carcinoma.

Authors:  A Lopes; B M Rossi; F P Fonseca; S Morini
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Morbidity following groin dissection for penile carcinoma.

Authors:  R Ravi
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1993-12

5.  First experience with gamma probe guided sentinel lymph node surgery in penile cancer.

Authors:  F Wawroschek; H Vogt; D Bachter; D Weckermann; M Hamm; R Harzmann
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2000-08

6.  Unreliability of sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging penile carcinoma.

Authors:  E Perinetti; D B Crane; W J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Sentinel lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.

Authors:  C A Pettaway; L L Pisters; C P Dinney; F Jularbal; D A Swanson; A C von Eschenbach; A Ayala
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Contemporary inguinal lymph node dissection: minimizing complications.

Authors:  Philippe E Spiess; Mike S Hernandez; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Chris Protzel; Antonio Alcaraz; Simon Horenblas; Giorgio Pizzocaro; Alexandre Zlotta; Oliver W Hakenberg
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis with preservation of saphenous veins: technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  W J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.